The Making of the Modern State: Social Scientization and Education Legislation in the United Kingdom, 1800–1914

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Daniel Scott Smith
{"title":"The Making of the Modern State: Social Scientization and Education Legislation in the United Kingdom, 1800–1914","authors":"Daniel Scott Smith","doi":"10.1017/s0003975623000425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Until the 19th century, the UK state stayed out of education. Only in 1833 would Parliament first pass an act that subsidized education for the poor. By 1914, 160 education acts had been passed, consolidating into the state schooling system we recognize today. This paper seeks to explain this remarkable progression. I argue that the emergence of social-knowledge institutions across the West was a powerful force of cultural construction. What I term social scientization, this process was multidimensional and translocal, entailing the elaboration, reification, and diffusion of functionalist theories of the nation-state that centered national education as means to greater cultural rationalization. Longitudinal analyses on comprehensive population data comprising over 10,100 UK parliamentary acts support the core historical insight of this piece: increasingly routine and aggressive forms of state intervention in education were the progressive instantiation of the 19th-century nation-state model, which was fundamentally epistemic in character and inextricably linked to the expansive cultural content of the ascendant social sciences.","PeriodicalId":46857,"journal":{"name":"Archives Europeennes De Sociologie","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives Europeennes De Sociologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975623000425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Until the 19th century, the UK state stayed out of education. Only in 1833 would Parliament first pass an act that subsidized education for the poor. By 1914, 160 education acts had been passed, consolidating into the state schooling system we recognize today. This paper seeks to explain this remarkable progression. I argue that the emergence of social-knowledge institutions across the West was a powerful force of cultural construction. What I term social scientization, this process was multidimensional and translocal, entailing the elaboration, reification, and diffusion of functionalist theories of the nation-state that centered national education as means to greater cultural rationalization. Longitudinal analyses on comprehensive population data comprising over 10,100 UK parliamentary acts support the core historical insight of this piece: increasingly routine and aggressive forms of state intervention in education were the progressive instantiation of the 19th-century nation-state model, which was fundamentally epistemic in character and inextricably linked to the expansive cultural content of the ascendant social sciences.
现代国家的形成:1800-1914年英国的社会科学化与教育立法
直到19世纪,英国政府都不插手教育。直到1833年,议会才首次通过了一项为穷人提供教育补贴的法案。到1914年,已经通过了160项教育法案,巩固了我们今天所认识的州立学校制度。本文试图解释这一显著的进步。我认为,整个西方社会知识机构的出现是文化建设的强大力量。我称之为社会科学化,这一过程是多维的、跨地域的,包含了以民族教育为中心的民族国家功能主义理论的阐述、具体化和传播,作为更大的文化合理化的手段。对包括超过10100项英国议会法案在内的综合人口数据的纵向分析支持了本文的核心历史见解:国家对教育的干预日益常规和激进的形式是19世纪民族国家模式的进步实例,这种模式基本上是认识论的特征,与崛起的社会科学的广泛文化内容密不可分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Consolidating its reputation for historical and comparative sociology of the highest order, European Journal of Sociology publishes articles of interdisciplinary scope which represent some of the best writing in the social sciences today. The journal has a strongly international perspective, with a special interest devoted to the transition from totalitarism to democracy, to the multiple citizenship and publishes a third issue every year exclusively devoted to state-of-the-art surveys, the elucidation of central concepts and review essays which explore key topics with reference to the most relevant recent publications. The journal receives contributions from young scholars as well as highly respected names such as Robert N. Bellah, Jon Elster and Lord Runciman.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信