{"title":"Status foe: a psychobiographical investigation of Ida B. Wells","authors":"Benjamin R. Wegner","doi":"10.1080/09540261.2023.2271076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIda B. Wells (1862-1931) led an extraordinary life as a journalist, educator, and activist while navigating the intersecting social realities of race, gender, and class. She embodied courage, advocating for the civil rights of Black Americans in an uncompromising fashion.Building on decades of research in social psychology, sociologist Cecilia L. Ridgeway presents (2019) a cultural schema theory of status. She contends that issues of status in interpersonal contexts are an unavoidable aspect of the human condition. Despite the ubiquity of status as a sociocultural force, Ridgeway believes that status hierarchies may be undermined.The present study is a psychobiographical exploration of Wells through the lens of Ridgeway’s status theory. It explores: the development of Wells’ cultural schemas; how Wells navigated her own status; the inter-relationship between Wells and her sociocultural context; and how Wells undermined and overcame status hierarchies.Keywords: Black AmericansBlack womencivil rightscultural schema theory of statusIda B. WellsjournalistsCecilia Ridgeway psychobiography AcknowledgementsI would like to thank Kathryn Wegner for editing the manuscript prior to publication.Disclosure of interestThe author reports no conflicts of interest. The author alone is responsible for the content and writing of the paper.Recommended citationWegner, B.R. (2023). Status foe: A psychobiographical investigation of Ida B. Wells.Notes1 It is not clear from the historical record if their relationship was consensual, and even if it was, one could argue that the power imbalance made a consensual relationship impossible.2 From the Civil War until about the 1970s, when President Richard Nixon implemented his “Southern Strategy,” it was the Republican party that traditionally supported African-American rights, not the Democrats3 One could make a deeper criticism of separate cars in general; in a classless society, even “professionalism” would not grant someone the right to sit in the first car. Additionally, there is room for analysis of the relationship between African-Americans such as Wells who possessed more status than many immigrants, but whose descendants in turn could benefit from anti-Blackness to gain status.","PeriodicalId":51391,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2023.2271076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractIda B. Wells (1862-1931) led an extraordinary life as a journalist, educator, and activist while navigating the intersecting social realities of race, gender, and class. She embodied courage, advocating for the civil rights of Black Americans in an uncompromising fashion.Building on decades of research in social psychology, sociologist Cecilia L. Ridgeway presents (2019) a cultural schema theory of status. She contends that issues of status in interpersonal contexts are an unavoidable aspect of the human condition. Despite the ubiquity of status as a sociocultural force, Ridgeway believes that status hierarchies may be undermined.The present study is a psychobiographical exploration of Wells through the lens of Ridgeway’s status theory. It explores: the development of Wells’ cultural schemas; how Wells navigated her own status; the inter-relationship between Wells and her sociocultural context; and how Wells undermined and overcame status hierarchies.Keywords: Black AmericansBlack womencivil rightscultural schema theory of statusIda B. WellsjournalistsCecilia Ridgeway psychobiography AcknowledgementsI would like to thank Kathryn Wegner for editing the manuscript prior to publication.Disclosure of interestThe author reports no conflicts of interest. The author alone is responsible for the content and writing of the paper.Recommended citationWegner, B.R. (2023). Status foe: A psychobiographical investigation of Ida B. Wells.Notes1 It is not clear from the historical record if their relationship was consensual, and even if it was, one could argue that the power imbalance made a consensual relationship impossible.2 From the Civil War until about the 1970s, when President Richard Nixon implemented his “Southern Strategy,” it was the Republican party that traditionally supported African-American rights, not the Democrats3 One could make a deeper criticism of separate cars in general; in a classless society, even “professionalism” would not grant someone the right to sit in the first car. Additionally, there is room for analysis of the relationship between African-Americans such as Wells who possessed more status than many immigrants, but whose descendants in turn could benefit from anti-Blackness to gain status.
威尔斯(1862-1931)作为一名记者、教育家和活动家,在种族、性别和阶级等交叉的社会现实中度过了非凡的一生。她体现了勇气,以一种毫不妥协的方式倡导美国黑人的民权。社会学家塞西莉亚·里奇韦(Cecilia L. Ridgeway)基于数十年的社会心理学研究,提出了一种关于地位的文化图式理论(2019)。她认为,人际关系中的地位问题是人类状况不可避免的一个方面。尽管地位作为一种社会文化力量无处不在,Ridgeway认为地位等级可能会被削弱。本研究是通过里奇韦的地位理论对威尔斯进行心理传记式的探索。探讨了威尔斯文化图式的发展;威尔斯如何驾驭自己的地位;威尔斯与其社会文化背景的相互关系;以及威尔斯如何破坏和克服地位等级制度。关键词:美国黑人黑人女性民权地位文化图式理论ida B. wells记者塞西莉亚·里奇韦心理传记致谢我要感谢凯瑟琳·韦格纳在出版前对手稿的编辑。利益披露作者报告无利益冲突。作者独自负责论文的内容和写作。推荐引用:wegner, B.R.(2023)。身份敌人:艾达·b·威尔斯的心理传记调查。注1:从历史记录来看,他们的关系是否是两厢情愿的并不清楚,即使是,人们也可以说,权力的不平衡使得两厢情愿的关系不可能发生从南北战争到大约20世纪70年代理查德·尼克松总统实施“南方战略”,传统上支持非裔美国人权利的是共和党,而不是民主党。在一个没有阶级的社会里,即使是“专业”也不会授予某人坐在第一辆车的权利。此外,对非裔美国人之间的关系也有分析的余地,比如威尔斯,他们比许多移民拥有更高的地位,但他们的后代反过来又可以从反黑人运动中受益,从而获得地位。
期刊介绍:
The International Review of Psychiatry is the premier review journal in the field with a truly international authorship and readership. Each bimonthly issue is dedicated to a specific theme relevant to psychiatry, edited by recognized experts on the topic, who are selected by the Editors and the Editorial Board. Each issue provides in-depth, scholarly reviews of the topic in focus. The Journal reaches a broad international readership including clinicians, academics, educators, and researchers who wish to remain up-to-date with recent and rapid developments in various fields of psychiatry. It aims to be of value to trainees by choosing topics of relevance to career development, which are also suitable for clinicians for continuing professional development.