Political opportunities and mobilisation on the far-right in Ukraine

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Tamta Gelashvili
{"title":"Political opportunities and mobilisation on the far-right in Ukraine","authors":"Tamta Gelashvili","doi":"10.1080/21599165.2023.2268000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ukrainian far right has attracted massive media interest, from Russian media condemning Ukraine’s alleged Nazi takeover to international media warning of it becoming a transnational far-right hotspot. Countering these misconceptions, this article empirically studies the Ukrainian far-right movement to explain its mobilisation dynamics 2004–2020. Why did mobilisation peak in 2010–2014, and decline after? I argue that a combination of political and discursive opportunities offers an answer. However, these opportunities played out differently in Ukraine – a hybrid regime at war – than conventional social movement theory suggests. The Ukrainian case thus furthers our understanding of far-right movements beyond consolidated democracies.","PeriodicalId":46570,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics","volume":"34 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2023.2268000","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ukrainian far right has attracted massive media interest, from Russian media condemning Ukraine’s alleged Nazi takeover to international media warning of it becoming a transnational far-right hotspot. Countering these misconceptions, this article empirically studies the Ukrainian far-right movement to explain its mobilisation dynamics 2004–2020. Why did mobilisation peak in 2010–2014, and decline after? I argue that a combination of political and discursive opportunities offers an answer. However, these opportunities played out differently in Ukraine – a hybrid regime at war – than conventional social movement theory suggests. The Ukrainian case thus furthers our understanding of far-right movements beyond consolidated democracies.
乌克兰极右翼的政治机会和动员
乌克兰极右翼吸引了大量媒体的兴趣,从俄罗斯媒体谴责乌克兰所谓的纳粹接管,到国际媒体警告乌克兰成为跨国极右翼热点。为了反驳这些误解,本文对乌克兰极右翼运动进行了实证研究,以解释其2004-2020年的动员动态。为什么动员在2010-2014年达到顶峰,之后又开始下降?我认为,政治和话语机会的结合提供了一个答案。然而,这些机会在乌克兰——一个处于战争中的混合政权——发挥的作用与传统的社会运动理论所认为的不同。因此,乌克兰的案例进一步加深了我们对超越巩固的民主国家的极右翼运动的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
East European Politics
East European Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.40%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信