Different conditional source-term estimation formulations applied to turbulent nonpremixed jet flames with varying levels of extinction

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
Amir H. Mahdipour, Cecile Devaud
{"title":"Different conditional source-term estimation formulations applied to turbulent nonpremixed jet flames with varying levels of extinction","authors":"Amir H. Mahdipour, Cecile Devaud","doi":"10.1080/13647830.2023.2271437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe objective of the present study is to investigate two new formulations of the Conditional Source-term Estimation (CSE) model using Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) calculations applied to Sandia flames D and F. The first method relies on a first-order Tikhonov regularisation and the second approach denoted by CSEBP, includes Bernstein polynomials to approximate the conditional averages. Current predictions for temperature, main product and minor species are consistent with previously published CSE results with a different implementation. However, smoother conditional profiles are obtained with less a priori information. Both formulations have good predictions for flame D with minor discrepancies near the inlet and one position downstream, with occasional small advantages for CSEBP. In contrast to previous RANS-CSE attempts, stable solutions are obtained for flame F in good agreement with the experiments. Considering the RANS and single conditioning limitations to capture transient effects, both formulations predict the changes of conditional averages and Favre averaged quantities from flame D to F well, except at one location where the predicted re-ignition occurs earlier than what is seen in the experiments. Additionally, the computational cost of the CSE routine is decreased significantly from 85% of the total computational cost to only 10% for the first formulation and under 3% for CSEBP by means of using hash tables for storing the results of interpolations from the chemistry tables and avoiding on-the-fly interpolations.Keywords: CSEBernstein polynomialsturbulencecombustionSandia flames Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work has been supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).","PeriodicalId":50665,"journal":{"name":"Combustion Theory and Modelling","volume":"28 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Combustion Theory and Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830.2023.2271437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThe objective of the present study is to investigate two new formulations of the Conditional Source-term Estimation (CSE) model using Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) calculations applied to Sandia flames D and F. The first method relies on a first-order Tikhonov regularisation and the second approach denoted by CSEBP, includes Bernstein polynomials to approximate the conditional averages. Current predictions for temperature, main product and minor species are consistent with previously published CSE results with a different implementation. However, smoother conditional profiles are obtained with less a priori information. Both formulations have good predictions for flame D with minor discrepancies near the inlet and one position downstream, with occasional small advantages for CSEBP. In contrast to previous RANS-CSE attempts, stable solutions are obtained for flame F in good agreement with the experiments. Considering the RANS and single conditioning limitations to capture transient effects, both formulations predict the changes of conditional averages and Favre averaged quantities from flame D to F well, except at one location where the predicted re-ignition occurs earlier than what is seen in the experiments. Additionally, the computational cost of the CSE routine is decreased significantly from 85% of the total computational cost to only 10% for the first formulation and under 3% for CSEBP by means of using hash tables for storing the results of interpolations from the chemistry tables and avoiding on-the-fly interpolations.Keywords: CSEBernstein polynomialsturbulencecombustionSandia flames Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work has been supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).
不同条件源项估计公式应用于不同消光程度的湍流非预混射流火焰
摘要本研究的目的是研究条件源项估计(CSE)模型的两种新公式,该模型使用适用于Sandia火焰D和f的Reynolds平均Navier Stokes (RANS)计算。第一种方法依赖于一阶Tikhonov正则化,第二种方法由CSEBP表示,包括Bernstein多项式来近似条件平均值。目前对温度、主要产品和次要物种的预测与以前发表的不同实施的CSE结果一致。然而,在先验信息较少的情况下,获得了更平滑的条件轮廓。两种公式对火焰D都有很好的预测,在入口附近和下游的一个位置有很小的差异,偶尔对CSEBP有小的优势。与以往的ranss - cse尝试相比,火焰F的稳定解与实验结果吻合得很好。考虑到RANS和捕捉瞬态效应的单一条件限制,两种公式都能很好地预测从火焰D到F的条件平均和Favre平均量的变化,除了在一个位置,预测的重燃发生得比实验中看到的要早。此外,通过使用哈希表存储化学表的插值结果并避免实时插值,CSE例程的计算成本从总计算成本的85%显著降低到第一次配方的10%和CSEBP的3%以下。关键词:CSEBernstein多项式湍流燃烧sandia火焰披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。本研究得到了加拿大自然科学与工程研究委员会(NSERC)的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Combustion Theory and Modelling
Combustion Theory and Modelling 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Combustion Theory and Modelling is a leading international journal devoted to the application of mathematical modelling, numerical simulation and experimental techniques to the study of combustion. Articles can cover a wide range of topics, such as: premixed laminar flames, laminar diffusion flames, turbulent combustion, fires, chemical kinetics, pollutant formation, microgravity, materials synthesis, chemical vapour deposition, catalysis, droplet and spray combustion, detonation dynamics, thermal explosions, ignition, energetic materials and propellants, burners and engine combustion. A diverse spectrum of mathematical methods may also be used, including large scale numerical simulation, hybrid computational schemes, front tracking, adaptive mesh refinement, optimized parallel computation, asymptotic methods and singular perturbation techniques, bifurcation theory, optimization methods, dynamical systems theory, cellular automata and discrete methods and probabilistic and statistical methods. Experimental studies that employ intrusive or nonintrusive diagnostics and are published in the Journal should be closely related to theoretical issues, by highlighting fundamental theoretical questions or by providing a sound basis for comparison with theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信