Indigenous activism debut in Brazil: the case of Rumo

Q4 Social Sciences
Raul Beal Partyka, Marina Gama, Jeferson Lana, Rosilene Marcon
{"title":"Indigenous activism debut in Brazil: the case of Rumo","authors":"Raul Beal Partyka, Marina Gama, Jeferson Lana, Rosilene Marcon","doi":"10.1108/eemcs-09-2022-0313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning outcomes By the end of the case study discussion, it is expected that students will have learned to assess what makes it likely that firms will respond to episodes of stakeholder activism; establish the interplay between nonmarket strategies and corporate governance mechanisms in assessing shareholder activism; explain about the board of directors as a corporate governance mechanism; evaluate the threats of nonmarket dimensions as a strategic response from the board; and understand the impact and increasing power of shareholders over board decisions. Case overview/synopsis In April 2019, to pressure Rumo S.A. regarding the duplication of the Itirapina–Cubatão railroad, indigenous peoples from 12 São Paulo villages bought six Rumo shares, which were quoted on Tuesday, April 23, 2019, at around BRL17 each. Duplication of the railroad started in 2011 and affected the lives of the Indians. The company promised to implement more than 100 improvements to the villages, but as of 2019, half of the improvements were at a standstill. After buying enough shares to entitle them to participate in the annual general meeting (AGM) of shareholders, the Indians went to Rumo’s AGM to voice their concerns and show how the villages had been affected. It was the audit committee that needed to discuss and solve the case of the indigenous peoples. What steps would Rumo take next? What was the best thing to do with regard to the claims of the Indians? This case shows the start of corporate activism in Brazil. This case reports the dilemma that Rumo faced with the indigenous activism at the beginning of 2019 because of the expansion of their railroad network across indigenous lands. Complexity academic level This case is suited for a class in which the students are exposed to a corporate governance framework and internal and external governance mechanisms. The case can be applied at the graduate and executive levels in relevant courses such as corporate governance, corporate responsibility, strategic management, and the stock market. Supplementary material Teaching notes are available for educators only. Subject code CSS 11: Strategy.","PeriodicalId":36648,"journal":{"name":"Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies","volume":"38 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/eemcs-09-2022-0313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning outcomes By the end of the case study discussion, it is expected that students will have learned to assess what makes it likely that firms will respond to episodes of stakeholder activism; establish the interplay between nonmarket strategies and corporate governance mechanisms in assessing shareholder activism; explain about the board of directors as a corporate governance mechanism; evaluate the threats of nonmarket dimensions as a strategic response from the board; and understand the impact and increasing power of shareholders over board decisions. Case overview/synopsis In April 2019, to pressure Rumo S.A. regarding the duplication of the Itirapina–Cubatão railroad, indigenous peoples from 12 São Paulo villages bought six Rumo shares, which were quoted on Tuesday, April 23, 2019, at around BRL17 each. Duplication of the railroad started in 2011 and affected the lives of the Indians. The company promised to implement more than 100 improvements to the villages, but as of 2019, half of the improvements were at a standstill. After buying enough shares to entitle them to participate in the annual general meeting (AGM) of shareholders, the Indians went to Rumo’s AGM to voice their concerns and show how the villages had been affected. It was the audit committee that needed to discuss and solve the case of the indigenous peoples. What steps would Rumo take next? What was the best thing to do with regard to the claims of the Indians? This case shows the start of corporate activism in Brazil. This case reports the dilemma that Rumo faced with the indigenous activism at the beginning of 2019 because of the expansion of their railroad network across indigenous lands. Complexity academic level This case is suited for a class in which the students are exposed to a corporate governance framework and internal and external governance mechanisms. The case can be applied at the graduate and executive levels in relevant courses such as corporate governance, corporate responsibility, strategic management, and the stock market. Supplementary material Teaching notes are available for educators only. Subject code CSS 11: Strategy.
巴西原住民行动主义首次登场:鲁莫案
学习成果在案例研究讨论结束时,预计学生将学会评估是什么使公司可能对利益相关者行动主义事件做出反应;建立非市场策略与公司治理机制在评估股东行动主义中的相互作用;解释董事会作为一种公司治理机制;评估非市场维度的威胁,作为董事会的战略回应;了解股东对董事会决策的影响和日益增强的权力。2019年4月,为了向Rumo S.A.就伊拉皮纳-库巴铁路的复制问题施压,来自12个圣保罗村庄的土著居民购买了6股Rumo股票,这些股票于2019年4月23日星期二报价,每股约为17巴西雷亚尔。铁路的重复建设始于2011年,影响了印第安人的生活。该公司承诺对村庄实施100多项改善措施,但截至2019年,一半的改善措施处于停滞状态。在购买了足够的股份,使他们有资格参加年度股东大会(AGM)之后,印度人去了Rumo的年度股东大会,表达了他们的担忧,并展示了这些村庄是如何受到影响的。审计委员会需要讨论和解决土著人民的问题。鲁莫下一步会采取什么措施?对于印第安人的主张,最好的办法是什么?这个案例显示了巴西企业行动主义的开始。本案例报告了鲁莫在2019年初面临的土著激进主义困境,因为他们的铁路网在土著土地上扩张。本案例适用于让学生接触公司治理框架以及内部和外部治理机制的课堂。本案例可应用于公司治理、企业责任、战略管理、股票市场等相关课程的研究生和高管层面。补充材料教学笔记只供教育工作者使用。主题代码CSS 11:策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies
Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信