The Position of Japan and South Korea Regarding the Russian-Ukrainian War

Іryna Habro, Оleksandr Shevchuk
{"title":"The Position of Japan and South Korea Regarding the Russian-Ukrainian War","authors":"Іryna Habro, Оleksandr Shevchuk","doi":"10.26693/ahpsxxi2023.si.072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reveals the position and actions of Japan and South Korea regarding the Russian-Ukrainian war after February 24, 2022. Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 prompted mostly symbolic sanctions from Japan and did not distract Tokyo from its aspiration to improve relations with Moscow. However, Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has caused tension in relations between Tokyo and Moscow. Japan is the center of support for Ukraine in the Asia-Pacific region, which is extremely important for our country, since this state belongs to the G7 and is one of the leading economies in the world.
 In contrast, South Korea’s reaction was mixed. When the war broke out, Seoul’s response was vague and mixed, prompting a wave of international criticism that the government did not seem to understand or know how to respond to. The first response of the administration of South Korean President Moon Jae-in was fear for South Korean exports to Russia. For several days, it was unclear whether Seoul would support the sanctions regime. South Korea took action only when the US began threatening trade exclusions on goods needed by exporters.
 Today, in the Asian context, South Korea and Japan are among the few countries that have provided the most comprehensive support to Ukraine and its partners after February 24, 2022. The Republic of Korea and Japan condemned Russia, imposed sanctions against Moscow, and provided Kyiv with aid and non-lethal military equipment. In addition, South Korea also transferred weapons to Ukraine to repel a Russian invasion, even if these transfers were made through third parties. South Korea and Japan’s pro-Ukrainian position and consequent anti-Russian stance is a result of their strong alliance with the United States and growing security ties with other Western countries, their need to prevent North Korea and China from contemplating similar actions, and their desire to inform that similar events in the region would be undesirable.","PeriodicalId":151057,"journal":{"name":"Acta de Historia & Politica: Saeculum XXI","volume":"40 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta de Historia & Politica: Saeculum XXI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26693/ahpsxxi2023.si.072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article reveals the position and actions of Japan and South Korea regarding the Russian-Ukrainian war after February 24, 2022. Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 prompted mostly symbolic sanctions from Japan and did not distract Tokyo from its aspiration to improve relations with Moscow. However, Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has caused tension in relations between Tokyo and Moscow. Japan is the center of support for Ukraine in the Asia-Pacific region, which is extremely important for our country, since this state belongs to the G7 and is one of the leading economies in the world. In contrast, South Korea’s reaction was mixed. When the war broke out, Seoul’s response was vague and mixed, prompting a wave of international criticism that the government did not seem to understand or know how to respond to. The first response of the administration of South Korean President Moon Jae-in was fear for South Korean exports to Russia. For several days, it was unclear whether Seoul would support the sanctions regime. South Korea took action only when the US began threatening trade exclusions on goods needed by exporters. Today, in the Asian context, South Korea and Japan are among the few countries that have provided the most comprehensive support to Ukraine and its partners after February 24, 2022. The Republic of Korea and Japan condemned Russia, imposed sanctions against Moscow, and provided Kyiv with aid and non-lethal military equipment. In addition, South Korea also transferred weapons to Ukraine to repel a Russian invasion, even if these transfers were made through third parties. South Korea and Japan’s pro-Ukrainian position and consequent anti-Russian stance is a result of their strong alliance with the United States and growing security ties with other Western countries, their need to prevent North Korea and China from contemplating similar actions, and their desire to inform that similar events in the region would be undesirable.
日本和韩国在俄乌战争中的立场
文章揭示了日本和韩国在2022年2月24日之后对俄乌战争的立场和行动。2014年俄罗斯吞并克里米亚,招致了日本主要是象征性的制裁,但这并没有分散东京改善与莫斯科关系的愿望。然而,俄罗斯对乌克兰的全面入侵导致东京和莫斯科之间的关系紧张。日本是在亚太地区支持乌克兰的中心,这对我国极为重要,因为乌克兰属于七国集团,是世界主要经济体之一。相比之下,韩国的反应则是褒贬不一。战争爆发时,韩国政府的反应含糊而复杂,引发了一波国际批评,称韩国政府似乎不理解或不知道如何应对。文在寅政府的第一反应是担心韩国对俄罗斯的出口。几天来,人们都不清楚首尔方面是否会支持制裁机制。韩国只是在美国开始威胁对出口商所需的商品进行贸易排除时才采取行动。今天,在亚洲范围内,韩国和日本是在2022年2月24日之后向乌克兰及其合作伙伴提供最全面支持的少数国家之一。大韩民国和日本谴责俄罗斯,对莫斯科实施制裁,并向基辅提供援助和非致命军事装备。此外,韩国还向乌克兰转让了武器,以击退俄罗斯的入侵,即使这些转让是通过第三方进行的。韩国和日本的亲乌克兰立场以及随之而来的反俄立场,是由于它们与美国的牢固联盟以及与其他西方国家日益加强的安全关系,它们需要阻止朝鲜和中国考虑采取类似行动,并且它们希望告知该地区不希望发生类似事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信