“Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic”: Genesis of Issue and Influence on the International Relations

Olesia Zvezdova
{"title":"“Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic”: Genesis of Issue and Influence on the International Relations","authors":"Olesia Zvezdova","doi":"10.26693/ahpsxxi2023.si.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important and urgent issue in the context of ensuring European and international security is the settlement of the Transnistrian conflict. Despite the considerable number of works on the Transnistrian issue, they are mainly devoted to the history and features of the conflict development. At the same time, problem of the present state of the territory and future forecasts are not explored properly. Therefore, the article aims to determine the historical background and stages of the conflict, to characterize the current state of the separatist region and to provide forecasts for the future situation. Methods used for the research include: content analysis, statistical, historical-genetic and the analytic-prognostic methods. \nThe article analyzes the basic historical prerequisites and causes of the Transnistrian conflict, which are divided into four blocks: historical, ethno-national, economic and geopolitical. The stages of conflict confrontation and the negotiation process in 5+2 format, the positions of the participating countries are explored. The process of conflict peaceful settlement began after the end of the armed confrontation phase in 1992. It is characterized by considerable activity of external actors, but has not led to significant consequences. A description of the current state of the so-called “Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic” is given. Particularly noteworthy is the ever-growing role of the Russian Federation, which traditionally views the territory as an area of its imperial national interests and uses this “frozen conflict” as a lever of influence over the pro-European Republic of Moldova. The main scenarios are highlighted: reintegration into the mother country; inclusion territory of the “de facto state” into patron state; achieving international recognition of sovereignty; maintaining the status quo. \nIt is concluded that federalization is the most possible forecast for the Transnistrian conflict, because Moldova already has similar experience in Gagauzia. But at the present stage we are observing the status quo.","PeriodicalId":151057,"journal":{"name":"Acta de Historia & Politica: Saeculum XXI","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta de Historia & Politica: Saeculum XXI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26693/ahpsxxi2023.si.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An important and urgent issue in the context of ensuring European and international security is the settlement of the Transnistrian conflict. Despite the considerable number of works on the Transnistrian issue, they are mainly devoted to the history and features of the conflict development. At the same time, problem of the present state of the territory and future forecasts are not explored properly. Therefore, the article aims to determine the historical background and stages of the conflict, to characterize the current state of the separatist region and to provide forecasts for the future situation. Methods used for the research include: content analysis, statistical, historical-genetic and the analytic-prognostic methods. The article analyzes the basic historical prerequisites and causes of the Transnistrian conflict, which are divided into four blocks: historical, ethno-national, economic and geopolitical. The stages of conflict confrontation and the negotiation process in 5+2 format, the positions of the participating countries are explored. The process of conflict peaceful settlement began after the end of the armed confrontation phase in 1992. It is characterized by considerable activity of external actors, but has not led to significant consequences. A description of the current state of the so-called “Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic” is given. Particularly noteworthy is the ever-growing role of the Russian Federation, which traditionally views the territory as an area of its imperial national interests and uses this “frozen conflict” as a lever of influence over the pro-European Republic of Moldova. The main scenarios are highlighted: reintegration into the mother country; inclusion territory of the “de facto state” into patron state; achieving international recognition of sovereignty; maintaining the status quo. It is concluded that federalization is the most possible forecast for the Transnistrian conflict, because Moldova already has similar experience in Gagauzia. But at the present stage we are observing the status quo.
“普里涅斯特罗夫的摩尔多瓦共和国”:问题的起源及其对国际关系的影响
在确保欧洲和国际安全方面,一个重要和紧迫的问题是解决德涅斯特河沿岸冲突。尽管关于德涅斯特河沿岸问题的著作相当多,但它们主要致力于冲突发展的历史和特点。同时,对领土现状和未来预测的问题没有进行适当的探讨。因此,本文旨在确定冲突的历史背景和阶段,描述分裂地区的现状,并为未来的情况提供预测。研究方法包括:内容分析法、统计学方法、历史遗传学方法和分析预后法。 文章分析了德涅斯特河沿岸冲突的基本历史前提和原因,并将其分为历史、民族、经济和地缘政治四个方面。探讨了冲突对抗阶段和5+2谈判进程,探讨了参与国的立场。1992年武装对抗阶段结束后,开始了和平解决冲突的进程。它的特点是外部行动者的大量活动,但没有导致重大后果。对所谓“普里涅斯特罗维亚摩尔多瓦共和国”的现状作了描述。特别值得注意的是俄罗斯联邦日益增长的作用,它传统上将该领土视为其帝国国家利益的一个领域,并利用这一“冻结冲突”作为对亲欧洲的摩尔多瓦共和国施加影响的杠杆。强调了主要情况:重新融入母国;将“事实国”的领土纳入保护国;使主权得到国际承认;维持现状 结论是,联邦化是德涅斯特河沿岸冲突最有可能的预测,因为摩尔多瓦已经在加加齐亚有过类似的经历。但在目前阶段,我们正在观察现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信