Decussating Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and Private International Law in India

Q4 Social Sciences
{"title":"Decussating Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and Private International Law in India","authors":"","doi":"10.56042/jipr.v28i6.762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intellectual property issues are covered by international contracts and need private enforcement, or steps taken in court byprivate parties. These legal actions are governed by the legislation of the nation where the lawsuit is filed and are based on theterritoriality concept. A thriving private international law may contribute to the system in ways that go well beyond resolvingindividual conflicts because it acknowledges the expressive and formative power of judicial decision-making. National courts hadplayed limited part in the development of global intellectual property law under the conventional framework controlling mattersrelating to intellectual property. The lack of willingness on the part of courts to consider claims involving external intellectualproperty rights resulted in a pattern of domestic litigation of foreign conflicts, typically based on a right similar to that given by themunicipal law system in effect at the time. When it came to intellectual property rights, litigation only involved the domestic rightsdiscussed in municipal law. It did, however, get national courts thinking about situations with global implications, which led to theincorporation of private international law into IP protections. In an effort to better understand the Indian perspective on foreignintellectual property concerns, this study examines the laws that govern IPR violation, validity, ownership, and the difficulties ofimplementing abroad court judgments.","PeriodicalId":39166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v28i6.762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intellectual property issues are covered by international contracts and need private enforcement, or steps taken in court byprivate parties. These legal actions are governed by the legislation of the nation where the lawsuit is filed and are based on theterritoriality concept. A thriving private international law may contribute to the system in ways that go well beyond resolvingindividual conflicts because it acknowledges the expressive and formative power of judicial decision-making. National courts hadplayed limited part in the development of global intellectual property law under the conventional framework controlling mattersrelating to intellectual property. The lack of willingness on the part of courts to consider claims involving external intellectualproperty rights resulted in a pattern of domestic litigation of foreign conflicts, typically based on a right similar to that given by themunicipal law system in effect at the time. When it came to intellectual property rights, litigation only involved the domestic rightsdiscussed in municipal law. It did, however, get national courts thinking about situations with global implications, which led to theincorporation of private international law into IP protections. In an effort to better understand the Indian perspective on foreignintellectual property concerns, this study examines the laws that govern IPR violation, validity, ownership, and the difficulties ofimplementing abroad court judgments.
讨论印度的知识产权和国际私法
知识产权问题包含在国际合同中,需要私人执行,或者由私人当事方在法庭上采取措施。这些法律行为受提起诉讼的国家的立法管辖,并以地域性概念为基础。蓬勃发展的国际私法可能会以远远超出解决个人冲突的方式对这一体系作出贡献,因为它承认司法决策的表达和形成力量。在控制与知识产权有关事项的传统框架下,国家法院在全球知识产权法的发展中发挥了有限的作用。法院不愿意考虑涉及外部知识产权的索赔,导致了一种针对外国冲突的国内诉讼模式,通常基于类似于当时有效的地方法律制度所赋予的权利。当涉及到知识产权时,诉讼只涉及国内法所讨论的国内权利。然而,它确实促使各国法院考虑具有全球影响的情况,从而将国际私法纳入知识产权保护。为了更好地理解印度对外国知识产权问题的看法,本研究考察了管理知识产权侵权、有效性、所有权和执行外国法院判决的困难的法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信