Comparative Analysis of Porous Titanium Spinal Cage with Conventional Spinal Cages: A Finite Element Study

IF 0.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Porous Titanium Spinal Cage with Conventional Spinal Cages: A Finite Element Study","authors":"","doi":"10.56042/jsir.v82i11.5506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to compare the stress shielding effect of various conventional as well as modified additive manufactured porous materials used for spinal cages. A finite element study was performed by changing the design (fully porous and hybrid) and the materials (PEEK, CFR-PEEK, Titanium) of spinal cages. All the models were simulated under uniaxial compression, to study the stress shielding effect. The Finite Element Analysis results showed that the hybrid spinal cage transfers more stress to its adjacent vertebrae than the other design configurations under uniaxial compression. The hybrid titanium cage was most effective in reducing the stress shielding effect. The hybrid cage is stronger than PEEK & CFR-PEEK cages, however, due to the porous structure reduced stress shielding was observed.","PeriodicalId":17010,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56042/jsir.v82i11.5506","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the stress shielding effect of various conventional as well as modified additive manufactured porous materials used for spinal cages. A finite element study was performed by changing the design (fully porous and hybrid) and the materials (PEEK, CFR-PEEK, Titanium) of spinal cages. All the models were simulated under uniaxial compression, to study the stress shielding effect. The Finite Element Analysis results showed that the hybrid spinal cage transfers more stress to its adjacent vertebrae than the other design configurations under uniaxial compression. The hybrid titanium cage was most effective in reducing the stress shielding effect. The hybrid cage is stronger than PEEK & CFR-PEEK cages, however, due to the porous structure reduced stress shielding was observed.
多孔钛脊柱保持器与传统脊柱保持器的有限元对比分析
本研究的目的是比较各种常规和改性添加剂制造的用于脊柱笼的多孔材料的应力屏蔽效果。通过改变脊柱笼的设计(全多孔和混合)和材料(PEEK, CFR-PEEK,钛)进行有限元研究。所有模型均在单轴压缩条件下进行了模拟,以研究应力屏蔽效应。有限元分析结果表明,在单轴压缩条件下,混合式脊柱笼向相邻椎体传递的应力大于其他设计构型。混合钛笼对降低应力屏蔽效应效果最好。混合笼比PEEK更坚固。然而,由于CFR-PEEK笼的多孔结构,观察到应力屏蔽降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research
Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
99
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: This oldest journal of NISCAIR (started in 1942) carries comprehensive reviews in different fields of science & technology (S&T), including industry, original articles, short communications and case studies, on various facets of industrial development, industrial research, technology management, technology forecasting, instrumentation and analytical techniques, specially of direct relevance to industrial entrepreneurs, debates on key industrial issues, editorials/technical commentaries, reports on S&T conferences, extensive book reviews and various industry related announcements.It covers all facets of industrial development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信