Diet in the management of type 2 diabetes: umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

Edyta Szczerba, Janett Barbaresko, Tim Schiemann, Anna Stahl-Pehe, Lukas Schwingshackl, Sabrina Schlesinger
{"title":"Diet in the management of type 2 diabetes: umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials","authors":"Edyta Szczerba, Janett Barbaresko, Tim Schiemann, Anna Stahl-Pehe, Lukas Schwingshackl, Sabrina Schlesinger","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To systematically summarise and evaluate the existing evidence on the effect of diet on the management of type 2 diabetes and prevention of complications. Design Umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Data sources PubMed, Embase, Epistemonikos, and Cochrane, from inception up to 5 June 2022. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials reporting summary effect estimates on the effect of diet on any health outcome in populations with type 2 diabetes were included in the review. Only meta-analyses with randomised controlled trials with the duration of at least 12 weeks were eligible for inclusion. Summary data were extracted by two investigators independently. Summary effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals were recalculated with a random effects model if the information provided was insufficient. Methodological quality was assessed with the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool and the certainty of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Results 88 publications with 312 meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials were included. Methodological quality was high to moderate in 23% and low to very low in 77% of the included publications. A high certainty of evidence was found for the beneficial effects of liquid meal replacement on reducing body weight (mean difference −2.37 kg, 95% confidence interval −3.30 to −1.44; n=9 randomised controlled trials included in the meta-analysis) and body mass index (−0.87, −1.32 to −0.43; n=8 randomised controlled trials), and of a low carbohydrate diet (<26% of total energy) on levels of haemoglobin A 1c (−0.47%, −0.60% to −0.34%; n=17 randomised controlled trials) and triglycerides (−0.30 mmol/L, −0.43 to −0.17; n=19 randomised controlled trials). A moderate certainty of evidence was found for the beneficial effects of liquid meal replacement, plant based, Mediterranean, high protein, low glycaemic index, and low carbohydrate diets (<26% total energy) on various cardiometabolic measures. The remaining results had low to very low certainty of evidence. Conclusions The evidence indicated that diet has a multifaceted role in the management of type 2 diabetes. An energy restricted diet can reduce body weight and improve cardiometabolic health. Beyond energy restriction, dietary approaches such as plant based, Mediterranean, low carbohydrate (<26% total energy), or high protein diets, and a higher intake of omega 3 fatty acids can be beneficial for cardiometabolic health in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42021252309.","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"17 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To systematically summarise and evaluate the existing evidence on the effect of diet on the management of type 2 diabetes and prevention of complications. Design Umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Data sources PubMed, Embase, Epistemonikos, and Cochrane, from inception up to 5 June 2022. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials reporting summary effect estimates on the effect of diet on any health outcome in populations with type 2 diabetes were included in the review. Only meta-analyses with randomised controlled trials with the duration of at least 12 weeks were eligible for inclusion. Summary data were extracted by two investigators independently. Summary effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals were recalculated with a random effects model if the information provided was insufficient. Methodological quality was assessed with the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool and the certainty of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Results 88 publications with 312 meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials were included. Methodological quality was high to moderate in 23% and low to very low in 77% of the included publications. A high certainty of evidence was found for the beneficial effects of liquid meal replacement on reducing body weight (mean difference −2.37 kg, 95% confidence interval −3.30 to −1.44; n=9 randomised controlled trials included in the meta-analysis) and body mass index (−0.87, −1.32 to −0.43; n=8 randomised controlled trials), and of a low carbohydrate diet (<26% of total energy) on levels of haemoglobin A 1c (−0.47%, −0.60% to −0.34%; n=17 randomised controlled trials) and triglycerides (−0.30 mmol/L, −0.43 to −0.17; n=19 randomised controlled trials). A moderate certainty of evidence was found for the beneficial effects of liquid meal replacement, plant based, Mediterranean, high protein, low glycaemic index, and low carbohydrate diets (<26% total energy) on various cardiometabolic measures. The remaining results had low to very low certainty of evidence. Conclusions The evidence indicated that diet has a multifaceted role in the management of type 2 diabetes. An energy restricted diet can reduce body weight and improve cardiometabolic health. Beyond energy restriction, dietary approaches such as plant based, Mediterranean, low carbohydrate (<26% total energy), or high protein diets, and a higher intake of omega 3 fatty acids can be beneficial for cardiometabolic health in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42021252309.
饮食在2型糖尿病管理中的作用:随机对照试验荟萃分析的系统综述
目的系统总结和评价饮食对2型糖尿病治疗及并发症预防的影响。设计对随机对照试验的荟萃分析进行系统评价的伞形评价。数据来源PubMed, Embase, Epistemonikos和Cochrane,从成立到2022年6月5日。本综述纳入了对随机对照试验进行meta分析的系统评价,这些随机对照试验报告了饮食对2型糖尿病人群任何健康结局的影响的总结效应估计。只有持续时间至少为12周的随机对照试验的荟萃分析才有资格纳入。汇总数据由两位研究者独立提取。如果提供的信息不充分,则使用随机效应模型重新计算具有95%置信区间的汇总效应估计。采用评估系统评价的测量工具(AMSTAR) 2工具评估方法学质量,并采用建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)方法评估证据的确定性。结果共纳入88篇出版物,312篇随机对照试验荟萃分析。在纳入的出版物中,23%的方法学质量为高至中等,77%的方法学质量为低至极低。高确定性证据表明,液体代餐对减轻体重有有益作用(平均差为- 2.37 kg, 95%置信区间为- 3.30至- 1.44;N =9个随机对照试验纳入meta分析)和体重指数(- 0.87,- 1.32至- 0.43;n=8个随机对照试验),以及低碳水化合物饮食(占总能量的26%)对血红蛋白a1c水平的影响(- 0.47%,- 0.60%至- 0.34%;n=17个随机对照试验)和甘油三酯(- 0.30 mmol/L, - 0.43至- 0.17;N =19个随机对照试验)。有中等确定性的证据表明,液体代餐、植物性饮食、地中海饮食、高蛋白饮食、低血糖指数饮食和低碳水化合物饮食(26%的总能量)对各种心脏代谢指标都有有益的影响。其余结果的证据确定性低至极低。结论有证据表明,饮食在2型糖尿病的治疗中具有多方面的作用。能量限制饮食可以减轻体重,改善心脏代谢健康。除了能量限制外,植物性饮食、地中海式饮食、低碳水化合物饮食(26%的总能量)或高蛋白饮食,以及摄入更多的omega - 3脂肪酸,对2型糖尿病患者的心脏代谢健康有益。系统评价注册号PROSPERO CRD42021252309。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信