He death of myths or a crisis of imagination? “Mythical thinking”, the phantasms of imagination, and a few remarks on Olga Tokarczuk’s works

{"title":"He death of myths or a crisis of imagination? “Mythical thinking”, the phantasms of imagination, and a few remarks on Olga Tokarczuk’s works","authors":"","doi":"10.26485/pp/2023/78/1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to examine the status of myths in contemporary literature and in reflections on postmodernity. In the first part, Jasionowicz raises questions about the ontological and cognitive status of myth in literature and cultural studies. Although the very concept of myth remains controversial, he recognizes it as a source of “rich narratives”, rooted in the archetypal potential of the creative imagination and capable of having a long-lasting, cultural, intersubjective “life.” There are also narratives that are less durable, as they attempt to detach themselves from their anthropological foundations. Olga Tokarczuk’s works serve as examples of processes that can be considered manifestations of the “non-binary imagination” visible in world literature of the first decades of the twentyfirst century. On the discursive (ideological) level, Tokarczuk’s vision of the world and the interrelated concepts are extremely dichotomous, which relates to the “interventionist” character of most of her texts. However, on the imaginative level, her imagination is non-dichotomous (intimist); it is a type of imagination that Gilbert Durand described as belonging to “mystical structures.” The lack of imaginative coherence between the ideologemes of critical postmodernism (built on the rhetoric of a radical gender conflict or the insurmountable “us-them” opposition) and the mycelial imagination has yet to consider such ideas and discourses as a new form of myth. Perhaps they could become myths if only they were able to create productive tension between these two systems of imagination and thus generate new meanings.","PeriodicalId":128140,"journal":{"name":"Prace Polonistyczne","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prace Polonistyczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26485/pp/2023/78/1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the article is to examine the status of myths in contemporary literature and in reflections on postmodernity. In the first part, Jasionowicz raises questions about the ontological and cognitive status of myth in literature and cultural studies. Although the very concept of myth remains controversial, he recognizes it as a source of “rich narratives”, rooted in the archetypal potential of the creative imagination and capable of having a long-lasting, cultural, intersubjective “life.” There are also narratives that are less durable, as they attempt to detach themselves from their anthropological foundations. Olga Tokarczuk’s works serve as examples of processes that can be considered manifestations of the “non-binary imagination” visible in world literature of the first decades of the twentyfirst century. On the discursive (ideological) level, Tokarczuk’s vision of the world and the interrelated concepts are extremely dichotomous, which relates to the “interventionist” character of most of her texts. However, on the imaginative level, her imagination is non-dichotomous (intimist); it is a type of imagination that Gilbert Durand described as belonging to “mystical structures.” The lack of imaginative coherence between the ideologemes of critical postmodernism (built on the rhetoric of a radical gender conflict or the insurmountable “us-them” opposition) and the mycelial imagination has yet to consider such ideas and discourses as a new form of myth. Perhaps they could become myths if only they were able to create productive tension between these two systems of imagination and thus generate new meanings.
他的死亡是神话还是想象力的危机?“神话思维”,想象的幻象,以及对奥尔加·托卡丘克作品的几点评论
本文旨在探讨神话在当代文学中的地位及其对后现代性的反思。在第一部分中,贾西奥诺维奇对神话在文学和文化研究中的本体论和认知地位提出了质疑。尽管神话的概念本身仍然存在争议,但他认为它是“丰富叙事”的来源,植根于创造性想象力的原型潜力,能够拥有持久的、文化的、主体间的“生命”。也有一些叙事不那么持久,因为它们试图脱离自己的人类学基础。Olga Tokarczuk的作品是21世纪头几十年世界文学中可见的“非二元想象”的体现。在话语(意识形态)层面上,托卡丘克对世界的看法和相关概念是极度两分化的,这与她大部分文本的“干涉主义”特征有关。然而,在想象层面上,她的想象是非二分的(内线主义);这是一种被吉尔伯特·杜兰德描述为属于“神秘结构”的想象。批判后现代主义的意识形态(建立在激进的性别冲突或不可逾越的“我们-他们”对立的修辞之上)与菌丝体想象力之间缺乏想象力的一致性,尚未将这些想法和话语视为一种新的神话形式。如果它们能够在这两种想象体系之间创造出富有成效的张力,从而产生新的意义,或许它们就能成为神话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信