{"title":"Collaborative gatekeeping: Consensus-seeking practices among emergency call-takers","authors":"Jessica W Gillooly","doi":"10.1093/police/paad070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The police are involved in many aspects of social life in the US, and much of their involvement stems from the emergency call-for-service system. Emergency call-takers play a crucial role in this system by filtering out inappropriate caller requests, but prior policing scholarship has overlooked the dynamic, interactional, and improvisational aspects of this work. This article illuminates these elements of gatekeeping by uncovering a set of consensus-seeking practices call-takers deploy over the telephone to collaboratively reframe callers’ problems as policeable or not. These findings help reconceptualize gatekeeping as a more fluid concept than prior scholarship has understood it to be. They also offer new avenues for organizational reform that include the study and dissemination of practices that call-takers use to process calls. Furthermore, these findings encourage agencies to move beyond exclusively rule-bound forms of guidance and pursue a practice-based reform agenda to help redefine the limits of the police role.","PeriodicalId":47186,"journal":{"name":"Policing-A Journal of Policy and Practice","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing-A Journal of Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paad070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract The police are involved in many aspects of social life in the US, and much of their involvement stems from the emergency call-for-service system. Emergency call-takers play a crucial role in this system by filtering out inappropriate caller requests, but prior policing scholarship has overlooked the dynamic, interactional, and improvisational aspects of this work. This article illuminates these elements of gatekeeping by uncovering a set of consensus-seeking practices call-takers deploy over the telephone to collaboratively reframe callers’ problems as policeable or not. These findings help reconceptualize gatekeeping as a more fluid concept than prior scholarship has understood it to be. They also offer new avenues for organizational reform that include the study and dissemination of practices that call-takers use to process calls. Furthermore, these findings encourage agencies to move beyond exclusively rule-bound forms of guidance and pursue a practice-based reform agenda to help redefine the limits of the police role.
期刊介绍:
Policing: a Journal of Policy and Practice is a leading policy and practice publication aimed at connecting law enforcement leaders, police researchers, analysts and policy makers, this peer-reviewed journal will contain critical analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics including current law enforcement policies, police reform, political and legal developments, training and education, patrol and investigative operations, accountability, comparative police practices, and human and civil rights. The journal has an international readership and author base. It draws on examples of good practice from around the world and examines current academic research, assessing how that research can be applied both strategically and at ground level. The journal is covered by the following abstracting and indexing services: Criminal Justice Abstracts, Emerging Sources Citation Index, The Standard Periodical Directory.