{"title":"The Sedition in Khorezm in the Second Half of the 12th Century and its Consequences: According to pre-Mongol Muslim Sources","authors":"Dmitry M. Timokhin","doi":"10.21638/spbu13.2023.209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the period of internecine struggle in the Khorezm state after the death of Khorezm Shah Abu’l-Fath Il-Arslan (1156–1172) between his sons — Sultan Shah Mahmud and ‘Ala’ ad-Din Tekish. Despite the fact that this episode from the Anushteginid dynasty is relatively well known to scholars, there has not yet been a single special study of how well this internecine war or the “Khorezmian sedition” was reflected in the synchronous Muslim texts of the 12th century, as well as in the writings of the early 13th century. Most of those who in their works tried to describe the struggle between these brothers for the Khorezm throne were based mainly on Muslim historical writings of the Mongol era. Here we see as our goal to consider the description of the “Khorezm sedition” in the monuments of the pre-Mongol period and compare the amount of information in them about this with the texts of a later time — this will allow not only to understand how detailed the event is described by the early authors in comparison with the later ones, but to identify possible continuity between them. Our research will also allow us to identify gaps in the description of the struggle between Sultan-Shah Mahmud and ‘Ala’ ad-Din Tekish in early texts, emphasize the facts of the “Khorezm sedition” relatively known to the authors of this period and thereby show what kind of picture of events is being built if we focus only on the writings of the pre-Mongol time. As a result, we hope to trace a certain evolution of the description of the war for the Khorezm throne in the Muslim writings of the 12th–13th centuries.","PeriodicalId":40378,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Iskusstvovedenie","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Iskusstvovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2023.209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines the period of internecine struggle in the Khorezm state after the death of Khorezm Shah Abu’l-Fath Il-Arslan (1156–1172) between his sons — Sultan Shah Mahmud and ‘Ala’ ad-Din Tekish. Despite the fact that this episode from the Anushteginid dynasty is relatively well known to scholars, there has not yet been a single special study of how well this internecine war or the “Khorezmian sedition” was reflected in the synchronous Muslim texts of the 12th century, as well as in the writings of the early 13th century. Most of those who in their works tried to describe the struggle between these brothers for the Khorezm throne were based mainly on Muslim historical writings of the Mongol era. Here we see as our goal to consider the description of the “Khorezm sedition” in the monuments of the pre-Mongol period and compare the amount of information in them about this with the texts of a later time — this will allow not only to understand how detailed the event is described by the early authors in comparison with the later ones, but to identify possible continuity between them. Our research will also allow us to identify gaps in the description of the struggle between Sultan-Shah Mahmud and ‘Ala’ ad-Din Tekish in early texts, emphasize the facts of the “Khorezm sedition” relatively known to the authors of this period and thereby show what kind of picture of events is being built if we focus only on the writings of the pre-Mongol time. As a result, we hope to trace a certain evolution of the description of the war for the Khorezm throne in the Muslim writings of the 12th–13th centuries.
本文考察了在Khorezm Shah Abu ' l- fath Il-Arslan(1156-1172)去世后,他的儿子- Sultan Shah Mahmud和' Ala ' ad-Din Tekish之间的内讧时期。尽管学者们对阿努什特吉尼王朝的这一事件相对熟悉,但还没有一项专门的研究表明,这场内讧战争或“Khorezmian骚乱”在12世纪的穆斯林文献以及13世纪早期的著作中反映得有多好。在他们的作品中,大多数试图描述这些兄弟之间为争夺花剌子模王位而进行的斗争的人,主要是基于蒙古时代的穆斯林历史著作。在这里,我们的目标是考虑前蒙古时期的纪念碑中对“花剌子暴乱”的描述,并将其中的信息量与后来的文本进行比较——这不仅可以让我们了解早期作者与后期作者对事件的描述有多详细,还可以确定它们之间可能的连续性。我们的研究还将使我们能够识别早期文本中苏丹-沙阿·马哈茂德和“阿拉”-丁·埃及人之间的斗争描述中的空白,强调这一时期的作者相对了解的“花心骚乱”的事实,从而显示如果我们只关注前蒙古时代的作品,我们正在构建什么样的事件图景。因此,我们希望追踪12 - 13世纪穆斯林著作中对花剌剌王座之战描述的某种演变。