The Impact of Tax Structure on Economic Growth: New Empirical Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Desislava G. Stoilova
{"title":"The Impact of Tax Structure on Economic Growth: New Empirical Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe","authors":"Desislava G. Stoilova","doi":"10.15826/jtr.2023.9.2.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to provide new evidence of the impact of total tax revenue and tax structure on economic growth in a sample of eleven European Union (EU) member states located in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), namely Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. The methods used are description, comparison, synthesis, regression and correlation analysis of annual panel data for the period 2000-2021. The ordinary least squares (OLS) method is used to estimate the parameters of the regression models. The causal relationship between the variables is confirmed by the Granger causality test. The main results indicate that there is a significant negative effect of total government spending on economic growth rate, while the total tax revenue has a positive impact. These findings suggest low efficiency of public spending. The structure of tax systems does not seem to hinder economic growth, as both direct and indirect tax revenues show a positive growth-supporting effect. Only social security contributions are estimated to have a detrimental impact on economic growth. Value added tax and both income taxes (personal and corporate) are found to be growth-conductive, while property taxes and excise duties seem to have no significant impact on the growth rate. Based on the research findings it is obvious that government expenditure is not an effective tool for positive fiscal impact on the economy, so policymakers can support economic growth by decreasing the share of public spending in GDP or by increasing its efficiency. It is recommended to maintain the current ratio between direct and indirect tax revenue, while carefully considering changes to social security systems to promote sustainable and inclusive growth.","PeriodicalId":53924,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tax Reform","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tax Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2023.9.2.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to provide new evidence of the impact of total tax revenue and tax structure on economic growth in a sample of eleven European Union (EU) member states located in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), namely Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. The methods used are description, comparison, synthesis, regression and correlation analysis of annual panel data for the period 2000-2021. The ordinary least squares (OLS) method is used to estimate the parameters of the regression models. The causal relationship between the variables is confirmed by the Granger causality test. The main results indicate that there is a significant negative effect of total government spending on economic growth rate, while the total tax revenue has a positive impact. These findings suggest low efficiency of public spending. The structure of tax systems does not seem to hinder economic growth, as both direct and indirect tax revenues show a positive growth-supporting effect. Only social security contributions are estimated to have a detrimental impact on economic growth. Value added tax and both income taxes (personal and corporate) are found to be growth-conductive, while property taxes and excise duties seem to have no significant impact on the growth rate. Based on the research findings it is obvious that government expenditure is not an effective tool for positive fiscal impact on the economy, so policymakers can support economic growth by decreasing the share of public spending in GDP or by increasing its efficiency. It is recommended to maintain the current ratio between direct and indirect tax revenue, while carefully considering changes to social security systems to promote sustainable and inclusive growth.
税收结构对经济增长的影响:来自中东欧的新经验证据
本研究旨在为位于中东欧(CEE)的11个欧盟成员国(即保加利亚、克罗地亚、捷克共和国、爱沙尼亚、匈牙利、拉脱维亚、立陶宛、波兰、罗马尼亚、斯洛伐克和斯洛文尼亚)的税收总额和税收结构对经济增长的影响提供新的证据。采用2000-2021年的年度面板数据进行描述、比较、综合、回归和相关分析。采用普通最小二乘(OLS)方法估计回归模型的参数。变量之间的因果关系通过格兰杰因果检验得到证实。主要结果表明,政府总支出对经济增长率有显著的负向影响,而税收总额对经济增长率有显著的正向影响。这些发现表明公共支出效率低下。税制结构似乎没有阻碍经济增长,因为直接和间接税收收入都显示出积极的增长支持作用。据估计,只有社会保障缴款才会对经济增长产生有害影响。增值税和所得税(个人和法人)被发现对增长有促进作用,而财产税和消费税似乎对增长率没有显著影响。根据研究结果,政府支出显然不是对经济产生积极财政影响的有效工具,因此政策制定者可以通过降低公共支出占GDP的比例或提高其效率来支持经济增长。建议保持当前直接和间接税收入的比例,同时认真考虑改革社会保障制度,以促进可持续和包容性增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Tax Reform
Journal of Tax Reform BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信