American Baby: A Mother, A Child, and the Shadow History of Adoption by Gabrielle Glaser (review)

{"title":"American Baby: A Mother, A Child, and the Shadow History of Adoption by Gabrielle Glaser (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/ado.2023.a907134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: American Baby: A Mother, A Child, and the Shadow History of Adoption by Gabrielle Glaser Marianne Novy (bio) Rev. of American Baby: A Mother, A Child, and the Shadow History of Adoption GABRIELLE GLASER, Viking, 2020 343 pp. $28.00 (hardback) ISBN: 9780735224681 Gabrielle Glaser's American Baby: A Mother, A Child and the Shadow History of Adoption combines the attention to emotion of a memoir (though the memories are found by interviewing) with the big picture research of a journalist to provide a stunning indictment of the procedures of some adoption agencies and maternity homes. She focuses on a 1961 case where the forced relinquishment for adoption is particularly egregious because the birthparents planned to marry but the girl, at seventeen, was threatened by her social worker with juvenile hall if she did not sign relinquishment papers, and where the consequences of sealed records were particularly harmful because of inherited tendencies toward disease that killed the adoptee in his fifties. A science writer with a focus on reproductive issues, Glaser met David Rosenberg when they both lived in Oregon during his long search to locate his birth-parents, and was touched by his story, which included a kidney donation from a friend in the absence of biological kin. They stayed in touch. Years later, after she moved to New York, where he was born and spent much of his childhood, he told her when DNA analysis put him in contact with his still-New-York-resident birthmother, Margaret Katz. Glaser learned in her interviews about the tyranny of Margaret's mother, who signed the papers removing her daughter's legal custody and allowing little Stephen, David's birth name, to be moved to a foster home without her knowledge. While in foster care, he was moved three times before he was given to the Rosenbergs. Margaret had been under surveillance in a maternity home where she was given no information about childbirth or birth control and told to make no friends there and forget everything. The agency, Louise Wise, lied about adoptive parents to Margaret and about Margaret and her fiancé to the adoptive parents. By the time the adoption papers were signed, Margaret and her fiancé were married, but this did not return her maternal rights. Even her attempts to protect her adopted-away child by telling Louise Wise, when his grandparents were diagnosed with three forms of cancer and his birthfather with sarcoidosis and diabetes, were frustrated. She was always told not to call, eventually threatened with police intervention; the information was never passed on to her son. Margaret feared that her next son will be taken and always wondered about Stephen when she saw dark-haired little boys near his age. Glaser puts this narrative, many of its details familiar from birthmothers' memoirs, in a larger frame by her research—Stephen's file reveals that one pediatrician prescribed the addictive drug phenobarbital for sleep problems at six weeks (82)—and she learns other troubling facts about how babies could be treated while in the custody of adoption agencies with no one to protect them. As part of one experiment, newborns and older babies were \"shot\" with guns made of rubber [End Page 131] bands to test their response to pain, which was supposed to show their intelligence and help place them with \"appropriate\" adoptive parents. In another experiment, the source of several films and memoirs, Louise Wise separated twins and triplets from each other and placed them with families with varying parental styles (some obviously difficult) to test the relative importance of nature and nurture. In spite of Maternal Care and Mental Health, John Bowlby's book on the child's need for consistency, published 1951 and circulating widely, this agency and others placed children in foster care so their intelligence could be tested before trying to give them a permanent home. But beyond these stories immediately relevant to her central figures, Glaser provides a brief history of adoption in the US, including nineteenth century orphan trains that moved children into indentured servitude, baby farms where ninety-six percent of the children might die, the selling of black market babies, and the beginnings of...","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.2023.a907134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Reviewed by: American Baby: A Mother, A Child, and the Shadow History of Adoption by Gabrielle Glaser Marianne Novy (bio) Rev. of American Baby: A Mother, A Child, and the Shadow History of Adoption GABRIELLE GLASER, Viking, 2020 343 pp. $28.00 (hardback) ISBN: 9780735224681 Gabrielle Glaser's American Baby: A Mother, A Child and the Shadow History of Adoption combines the attention to emotion of a memoir (though the memories are found by interviewing) with the big picture research of a journalist to provide a stunning indictment of the procedures of some adoption agencies and maternity homes. She focuses on a 1961 case where the forced relinquishment for adoption is particularly egregious because the birthparents planned to marry but the girl, at seventeen, was threatened by her social worker with juvenile hall if she did not sign relinquishment papers, and where the consequences of sealed records were particularly harmful because of inherited tendencies toward disease that killed the adoptee in his fifties. A science writer with a focus on reproductive issues, Glaser met David Rosenberg when they both lived in Oregon during his long search to locate his birth-parents, and was touched by his story, which included a kidney donation from a friend in the absence of biological kin. They stayed in touch. Years later, after she moved to New York, where he was born and spent much of his childhood, he told her when DNA analysis put him in contact with his still-New-York-resident birthmother, Margaret Katz. Glaser learned in her interviews about the tyranny of Margaret's mother, who signed the papers removing her daughter's legal custody and allowing little Stephen, David's birth name, to be moved to a foster home without her knowledge. While in foster care, he was moved three times before he was given to the Rosenbergs. Margaret had been under surveillance in a maternity home where she was given no information about childbirth or birth control and told to make no friends there and forget everything. The agency, Louise Wise, lied about adoptive parents to Margaret and about Margaret and her fiancé to the adoptive parents. By the time the adoption papers were signed, Margaret and her fiancé were married, but this did not return her maternal rights. Even her attempts to protect her adopted-away child by telling Louise Wise, when his grandparents were diagnosed with three forms of cancer and his birthfather with sarcoidosis and diabetes, were frustrated. She was always told not to call, eventually threatened with police intervention; the information was never passed on to her son. Margaret feared that her next son will be taken and always wondered about Stephen when she saw dark-haired little boys near his age. Glaser puts this narrative, many of its details familiar from birthmothers' memoirs, in a larger frame by her research—Stephen's file reveals that one pediatrician prescribed the addictive drug phenobarbital for sleep problems at six weeks (82)—and she learns other troubling facts about how babies could be treated while in the custody of adoption agencies with no one to protect them. As part of one experiment, newborns and older babies were "shot" with guns made of rubber [End Page 131] bands to test their response to pain, which was supposed to show their intelligence and help place them with "appropriate" adoptive parents. In another experiment, the source of several films and memoirs, Louise Wise separated twins and triplets from each other and placed them with families with varying parental styles (some obviously difficult) to test the relative importance of nature and nurture. In spite of Maternal Care and Mental Health, John Bowlby's book on the child's need for consistency, published 1951 and circulating widely, this agency and others placed children in foster care so their intelligence could be tested before trying to give them a permanent home. But beyond these stories immediately relevant to her central figures, Glaser provides a brief history of adoption in the US, including nineteenth century orphan trains that moved children into indentured servitude, baby farms where ninety-six percent of the children might die, the selling of black market babies, and the beginnings of...
加布里埃尔·格拉泽《美国婴儿:一个母亲、一个孩子和收养的阴影历史》
书评:《美国婴儿:一个母亲,一个孩子,和收养的影子历史》作者:加布里埃尔·格拉泽玛丽安·诺维(传记)《美国婴儿:一个母亲,一个孩子,和收养的影子历史》作者:加布里埃尔·格拉泽,维京,2020 343页,28.00美元(精装本)ISBN: 9780735224681《母亲,孩子和收养的阴影历史》将回忆录对情感的关注(尽管这些记忆是通过采访发现的)与记者的宏观研究结合起来,对一些收养机构和妇产院的程序进行了惊人的控诉。她关注的是1961年的一个案例,强迫放弃收养是非常恶劣的,因为生父母计划结婚,但17岁的女孩,如果她不签署放弃文件,就会受到青少年管教所的社会工作者的威胁,而密封记录的后果尤其有害,因为遗传了疾病的倾向,导致被收养者在50多岁时死亡。格拉泽是一位关注生殖问题的科学作家,在他长期寻找亲生父母的过程中,他和大卫·罗森伯格住在俄勒冈州,他被他的故事所感动,其中包括一位朋友在没有亲生亲属的情况下捐赠的肾脏。他们一直保持联系。多年后,她搬到了纽约,他在那里出生并度过了大部分童年时光。他告诉她,DNA分析发现他与仍然住在纽约的生母玛格丽特·卡茨(Margaret Katz)有过联系。格拉泽在采访中了解到玛格丽特母亲的专横,她签署了文件,剥夺了她女儿的合法监护权,允许小斯蒂芬(大卫的本名)在她不知情的情况下被转移到寄养家庭。在被寄养期间,他被转移了三次才被送到罗森伯格家。玛格丽特一直在一家妇产之家受到监视,在那里她没有得到任何有关分娩或避孕的信息,并被告知不要在那里交朋友,忘记一切。中介路易丝·怀斯向玛格丽特隐瞒了养父母的事,又向养父母隐瞒了玛格丽特和她未婚夫的事。当收养文件签署的时候,玛格丽特和她的未婚夫结婚了,但这并没有恢复她作为母亲的权利。当他的祖父母被诊断出患有三种癌症,他的生父被诊断出患有结节病和糖尿病时,她试图告诉路易丝·怀斯,以保护她的被收养的孩子,但都失败了。她总是被告知不要打电话,最后还被威胁要警察介入;这个消息从未传给她的儿子。玛格丽特担心她的下一个儿子会被带走,当她看到和他年龄相仿的黑发小男孩时,她总是对斯蒂芬感到奇怪。格拉泽把这个故事,其中许多细节从生母的回忆录中熟悉,放在她研究的更大框架中——斯蒂芬的档案显示,一位儿科医生为六周(82)大的婴儿开了成瘾性药物苯巴比妥来治疗睡眠问题——她了解到其他令人不安的事实,即婴儿在收养机构的监护下是如何被对待的,没有人保护他们。作为实验的一部分,新生儿和大一点的婴儿被用橡胶带制成的枪“射击”,以测试他们对疼痛的反应,这被认为是显示他们的智力,并帮助他们找到“合适的”养父母。在另一项实验中,路易丝·怀斯(Louise Wise)将双胞胎和三胞胎分开,并将他们安置在父母风格不同(有些显然很难)的家庭中,以测试先天和后天的相对重要性。尽管约翰·鲍尔比(John Bowlby)在1951年出版的《母亲照顾与心理健康》(Maternal Care and Mental Health)一书中讨论了儿童对一致性的需求,并广为流传,但该机构和其他机构还是将儿童安置在寄养中心,以便在给他们一个永久的家之前测试他们的智力。但除了这些与她的核心人物直接相关的故事之外,格拉塞还提供了美国收养的简史,包括19世纪将儿童运送到契约奴役的孤儿火车,96%的儿童可能会死亡的婴儿农场,黑市婴儿的出售,以及……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信