Law and Adoption in the UK: A Conversation with Alice Diver

Alice Diver, Emily Hipchen
{"title":"Law and Adoption in the UK: A Conversation with Alice Diver","authors":"Alice Diver, Emily Hipchen","doi":"10.1353/ado.2023.a907128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract: In this conversation, Emily Hipchen speaks with Dr. Alice Diver (School of Law, QUB, N. Ireland) about some of the themes underpinning her publication, \"'Monstrous Othering': The Gothic Nature of Origin-Tracing in Law and Literature\" (November 2021). The conversation opens with a brief discussion of their own respective experiences as \"mother and baby home\" adoptees in the US and Canada in the 1960s before turning to an analysis of how the particular adoptee brand of \"fearful otherness\" is often represented—and indeed perpetuated—in certain works of \"monstrous orphan\" fiction. In respect of achieving meaningful sociolegal and cultural reforms, language is key. The debates surrounding the wording of Ireland's controversial Birth Information and Tracing Act (2022) highlighted how lingering prejudices still attach to the topic of adoption and to the need to find one's origins. Discriminatory barriers to access—and contact with genetic relatives—still exist: the use of labels matters, too, as the controversy over the use of the term \"birth mother\" within the legislation (since amended to \"mother\") also evidenced. Though mainly relevant to adoptee rights, and adoption law and policy, debates and discourse on language may also impact on other areas where losses of origins occur, such as surrogacy and international adoption.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.2023.a907128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract: In this conversation, Emily Hipchen speaks with Dr. Alice Diver (School of Law, QUB, N. Ireland) about some of the themes underpinning her publication, "'Monstrous Othering': The Gothic Nature of Origin-Tracing in Law and Literature" (November 2021). The conversation opens with a brief discussion of their own respective experiences as "mother and baby home" adoptees in the US and Canada in the 1960s before turning to an analysis of how the particular adoptee brand of "fearful otherness" is often represented—and indeed perpetuated—in certain works of "monstrous orphan" fiction. In respect of achieving meaningful sociolegal and cultural reforms, language is key. The debates surrounding the wording of Ireland's controversial Birth Information and Tracing Act (2022) highlighted how lingering prejudices still attach to the topic of adoption and to the need to find one's origins. Discriminatory barriers to access—and contact with genetic relatives—still exist: the use of labels matters, too, as the controversy over the use of the term "birth mother" within the legislation (since amended to "mother") also evidenced. Though mainly relevant to adoptee rights, and adoption law and policy, debates and discourse on language may also impact on other areas where losses of origins occur, such as surrogacy and international adoption.
英国的法律和收养:与爱丽丝·戴弗的对话
摘要:在这次谈话中,艾米丽·希普陈与博士爱丽丝·Diver(法律学校,QUB, N.爱尔兰)关于一些主题支撑她的出版物,“‘怪异的他人’:在法律和文学起源追踪的哥特性质”(2021年11月)。对话以他们各自在20世纪60年代在美国和加拿大作为“母亲和婴儿之家”被收养者的经历开始,然后转向分析在某些“可怕的孤儿”小说作品中,被收养者的“可怕的他者”品牌是如何经常被表现出来的——实际上是永存的。在实现有意义的社会、法律和文化改革方面,语言是关键。围绕爱尔兰备受争议的《出生信息和追踪法》(2022年)措辞的辩论突显出,在收养这个话题上,以及在寻找自己的血统的必要性上,偏见仍然挥之不去。在获取和接触遗传亲属方面的歧视性障碍仍然存在:标签的使用也很重要,因为在立法中使用“生母”一词(后来修改为“母亲”)的争议也证明了这一点。虽然主要与被收养人的权利以及收养法律和政策有关,但关于语言的辩论和论述也可能影响到发生血统丧失的其他领域,例如代孕和国际收养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信