Research on the Distribution of Proof Responsibility in Civil Litigation of Trade Secret Infringement

{"title":"Research on the Distribution of Proof Responsibility in Civil Litigation of Trade Secret Infringement","authors":"","doi":"10.23977/law.2023.020709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the civil litigation dispute of trade secret infringement, the allocation of the burden of proof is particularly important. According to relevant statistics, the successful rate of trade secret right holders is low, the reason why is mainly due to the right holder's limited ability to prove. The newly amended Anti-Unfair Competition Law has increased the allocation of the burden of proof in trade secret cases, not only made provisions for the proof of trade secret elements, but also clarified the application of the transfer of the burden of proof, which is intended to reduce the difficulty of the plaintiff's proof and strengthen the judicial protection of trade secrets. However, due to the amendment is to keep in line with the \"China-US trade agreement\", the process is relatively hasty.Accordingly, there are vague and insufficient provisions in the law.The preliminary proof and its standard of proof are not clear,and the effect of Article 32 of the new regulations on the reduction of the plaintiff's burden of proof and the increase of the defendant's burden of proof still needs to be tested in judicial practice as well.","PeriodicalId":271650,"journal":{"name":"Science of Law Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the civil litigation dispute of trade secret infringement, the allocation of the burden of proof is particularly important. According to relevant statistics, the successful rate of trade secret right holders is low, the reason why is mainly due to the right holder's limited ability to prove. The newly amended Anti-Unfair Competition Law has increased the allocation of the burden of proof in trade secret cases, not only made provisions for the proof of trade secret elements, but also clarified the application of the transfer of the burden of proof, which is intended to reduce the difficulty of the plaintiff's proof and strengthen the judicial protection of trade secrets. However, due to the amendment is to keep in line with the "China-US trade agreement", the process is relatively hasty.Accordingly, there are vague and insufficient provisions in the law.The preliminary proof and its standard of proof are not clear,and the effect of Article 32 of the new regulations on the reduction of the plaintiff's burden of proof and the increase of the defendant's burden of proof still needs to be tested in judicial practice as well.
商业秘密侵权民事诉讼举证责任分配研究
在商业秘密侵权民事诉讼纠纷中,举证责任的分配尤为重要。据相关统计,商业秘密权利人的诉讼成功率较低,究其原因,主要是由于权利人的举证能力有限。新修订的《反不正当竞争法》增加了商业秘密案件举证责任的分配,不仅对商业秘密要件的举证作出规定,而且明确了举证责任转移的适用,旨在降低原告举证难度,加强商业秘密的司法保护。然而,由于修正案是为了与“中美贸易协定”保持一致,因此过程相对仓促。因此,法律中有模糊和不充分的规定。初步证明及其证明标准不明确,新规第32条对减轻原告举证责任和增加被告举证责任的效果也有待司法实践检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信