{"title":"Measuring One-Sided Process Capability Index for Autocorrelated Data in the Presence of Random Measurement Errors","authors":"Kuntal Bera, M. Z. Anis","doi":"10.1515/eqc-2023-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many quality characteristics in manufacturing industry are of one sided specifications. The well-known process capability indices <m:math xmlns:m=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <m:msub> <m:mi>C</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mi>P</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mi>U</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:math> C_{PU} and <m:math xmlns:m=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <m:msub> <m:mi>C</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mi>P</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mi>L</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:math> C_{PL} are often used to measure the performance of such type of production process. It is usually assumed that process observations are independent and measurement system is free of errors. But actually in many industry it has been proven that auto-correlation is an inherent nature of the production process, especially for chemical processes. Moreover, even with the use of highly sophisticated advanced measuring instruments some amount of measurement error is always present in the observed data. Hence gauge measurement error also needs to be considered. In this paper we discuss some inferential properties of one-sided process capability indices for a stationary Gaussian process in the presence of measurement errors. As a particular case of a stationary Gaussian process, we discuss the case of a stationary <m:math xmlns:m=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>AR</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy=\"false\">(</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo stretchy=\"false\">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> \\operatorname{AR}(1) process where measurement error follows an independent Gaussian distribution.","PeriodicalId":37499,"journal":{"name":"Stochastics and Quality Control","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stochastics and Quality Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eqc-2023-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Many quality characteristics in manufacturing industry are of one sided specifications. The well-known process capability indices CPU C_{PU} and CPL C_{PL} are often used to measure the performance of such type of production process. It is usually assumed that process observations are independent and measurement system is free of errors. But actually in many industry it has been proven that auto-correlation is an inherent nature of the production process, especially for chemical processes. Moreover, even with the use of highly sophisticated advanced measuring instruments some amount of measurement error is always present in the observed data. Hence gauge measurement error also needs to be considered. In this paper we discuss some inferential properties of one-sided process capability indices for a stationary Gaussian process in the presence of measurement errors. As a particular case of a stationary Gaussian process, we discuss the case of a stationary AR(1) \operatorname{AR}(1) process where measurement error follows an independent Gaussian distribution.
制造业的许多质量特征都是片面的。众所周知的过程能力指标cp _ U C_{PU}和cp _ L C_{PL}经常被用来衡量这类生产过程的性能。通常假设过程观测是独立的,测量系统没有误差。但实际上,在许多行业中已经证明,自相关是生产过程的固有性质,特别是对于化学过程。此外,即使使用高度精密的先进测量仪器,在观测数据中也总是存在一定数量的测量误差。因此,还需要考虑量规测量误差。本文讨论了存在测量误差的平稳高斯过程单侧过程能力指标的一些推论性质。作为平稳高斯过程的一个特例,我们讨论了测量误差服从独立高斯分布的平稳AR (1) \operatorname{AR}(1)过程的情况。