Recalling, Reacting But Not So Much Regretting: How Young Adults Describe Their Sexual and Romantic Infidelity Experiences

IF 1.4 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Laura C. H. Coon, Kate B. Metcalfe, Charlene F. Belu, Lucia F. O’Sullivan
{"title":"Recalling, Reacting But Not So Much Regretting: How Young Adults Describe Their Sexual and Romantic Infidelity Experiences","authors":"Laura C. H. Coon, Kate B. Metcalfe, Charlene F. Belu, Lucia F. O’Sullivan","doi":"10.3138/cjhs.2023-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Infidelity is reported at high rates despite strong societal prohibitions against it, leading to questions about whether outcomes support the motives driving infidelity. Little is known about whether motives behind infidelity correspond to perceived outcomes, including regret, but such information might help to explain the paradox of the high rates. Participants were recruited from a large prospective study on monogamy. Analyses were conducted on surveys from the 94 individuals who engaged in infidelity over the year. Using structured and open-ended measures, the authors examined how infidelity evolved, patterns among motives and outcomes, and regret. Infidelity typically began at work or online, lasted about one year, and involved sex as well as feelings of infatuation or love. Most (63.4%) reported not regretting their infidelity. Motives (anger, neglect, dissatisfaction, sex) were compared with outcomes (fulfilled needs, sexual satisfaction, distress) to assess concordance. Being motivated by feelings of neglect or relationship dissatisfaction was associated with needs fulfilled by infidelity; sex as a motive was associated with sexual satisfaction as an outcome. However, concordance in motives and outcomes was unrelated to regret.","PeriodicalId":51789,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2023-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infidelity is reported at high rates despite strong societal prohibitions against it, leading to questions about whether outcomes support the motives driving infidelity. Little is known about whether motives behind infidelity correspond to perceived outcomes, including regret, but such information might help to explain the paradox of the high rates. Participants were recruited from a large prospective study on monogamy. Analyses were conducted on surveys from the 94 individuals who engaged in infidelity over the year. Using structured and open-ended measures, the authors examined how infidelity evolved, patterns among motives and outcomes, and regret. Infidelity typically began at work or online, lasted about one year, and involved sex as well as feelings of infatuation or love. Most (63.4%) reported not regretting their infidelity. Motives (anger, neglect, dissatisfaction, sex) were compared with outcomes (fulfilled needs, sexual satisfaction, distress) to assess concordance. Being motivated by feelings of neglect or relationship dissatisfaction was associated with needs fulfilled by infidelity; sex as a motive was associated with sexual satisfaction as an outcome. However, concordance in motives and outcomes was unrelated to regret.
回顾,反应但不那么后悔:年轻人如何描述他们的性和浪漫的不忠经历
尽管社会上强烈禁止不忠行为,但不忠行为的报道率却很高,这引发了人们对结果是否支持不忠动机的质疑。关于不忠背后的动机是否与包括后悔在内的感知结果相对应,我们知之甚少,但这些信息可能有助于解释高比率的悖论。参与者是从一项关于一夫一妻制的大型前瞻性研究中招募的。研究人员对过去一年中94名出轨人士的调查结果进行了分析。使用结构化和开放式的测量方法,作者研究了不忠是如何演变的,动机和结果之间的模式,以及后悔。不忠通常始于工作或网络,持续约一年,涉及性以及迷恋或爱的感觉。大多数人(63.4%)表示不后悔自己的不忠行为。将动机(愤怒、忽视、不满、性)与结果(满足需求、性满足、痛苦)进行比较,以评估一致性。被忽视的感觉或对关系的不满所驱动与不忠所满足的需求有关;作为动机的性与作为结果的性满足相关联。然而,动机和结果的一致性与后悔无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality (CJHS) is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal focusing on the medical, psychological, social, and educational aspects of human sexuality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信