Adalard Dominique, Patrice Trey Xavier, Olliver Leo Sandre
{"title":"Economic And Sensitivity Analysis Stimulation Of Coiled Tubing And Bullhead Combination On A Horizontal Well","authors":"Adalard Dominique, Patrice Trey Xavier, Olliver Leo Sandre","doi":"10.25299/jgeet.2023.8.2.14495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Production decreased often occur in Indonesia's oil and gas fields which becomes a problem for oil well exploration. Thus the role of the company demands to be able to re-optimize the flow rate of oil production in the oil and gas field. One of the workover jobs was stimulation. The function of the work was to stimulate the wells mechanically and chemically which aimed to increase the productivity of wells that have experienced a decrease in oil production, in which mechanical stimulation was in the form of coiled tubing units and bullhead used chemical stimulation, namely acidizing and solvent. To prove the economy of the coiled tubing unit and bullhead stimulation work, calculations and analysis of economic indicators such as net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and payout time (POT) can be carried out. Where this study aimed to determine the economics of the stimulation project carried out on the horizontal wells of the RD field. The results of the calculation of economic indicators that will be feasible are not like this stimulated workover work project with an investment of US$ 133,053 acidizing coiled ribbing oil price of 68.51 USS/bbl thus the calculation of NPV @ 10% 60631 USS, POT 0.74 months, P1 9, is obtained. 73, IRR 355%, coiled tubing solvent well US$ 185,967.166 NPV@ 10% 98,431 USS, POT 3.94 months, PI 3.69, IRR 103%, bullhead acidizing well US$ 8858.31 value NPV@10% 218029 USS, POT 0.95 months, P1 45.16, IRR 1890% and bullhead solvent USS 72745 value NPV@10% USS 248586, POT 0.94 months, PT 52.53, IRR 1822%. Sensitivity analysis on stimulated workover work is carried out by changing the assumptions with 85% and 115% then the results obtained are the oil price value which is the parameter that most influences the NPV value then oil production, and capex. From the results of profit indicator calculations and sensitivity analysis, it can be concluded that the stimulated workover work in the RD field is all feasible because it meets the eligibility requirements of a project.","PeriodicalId":31931,"journal":{"name":"JGEET Journal of Geoscience Engineering Environment and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGEET Journal of Geoscience Engineering Environment and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25299/jgeet.2023.8.2.14495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Production decreased often occur in Indonesia's oil and gas fields which becomes a problem for oil well exploration. Thus the role of the company demands to be able to re-optimize the flow rate of oil production in the oil and gas field. One of the workover jobs was stimulation. The function of the work was to stimulate the wells mechanically and chemically which aimed to increase the productivity of wells that have experienced a decrease in oil production, in which mechanical stimulation was in the form of coiled tubing units and bullhead used chemical stimulation, namely acidizing and solvent. To prove the economy of the coiled tubing unit and bullhead stimulation work, calculations and analysis of economic indicators such as net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and payout time (POT) can be carried out. Where this study aimed to determine the economics of the stimulation project carried out on the horizontal wells of the RD field. The results of the calculation of economic indicators that will be feasible are not like this stimulated workover work project with an investment of US$ 133,053 acidizing coiled ribbing oil price of 68.51 USS/bbl thus the calculation of NPV @ 10% 60631 USS, POT 0.74 months, P1 9, is obtained. 73, IRR 355%, coiled tubing solvent well US$ 185,967.166 NPV@ 10% 98,431 USS, POT 3.94 months, PI 3.69, IRR 103%, bullhead acidizing well US$ 8858.31 value NPV@10% 218029 USS, POT 0.95 months, P1 45.16, IRR 1890% and bullhead solvent USS 72745 value NPV@10% USS 248586, POT 0.94 months, PT 52.53, IRR 1822%. Sensitivity analysis on stimulated workover work is carried out by changing the assumptions with 85% and 115% then the results obtained are the oil price value which is the parameter that most influences the NPV value then oil production, and capex. From the results of profit indicator calculations and sensitivity analysis, it can be concluded that the stimulated workover work in the RD field is all feasible because it meets the eligibility requirements of a project.