Senatorial Estates in Imperial Asia Minor – State of the Question, Methodological Issues and Perspectives on Future Research

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Gephyra Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.37095/gephyra.1356511
Andreas KLİNGENBERG
{"title":"Senatorial Estates in Imperial Asia Minor – State of the Question, Methodological Issues and Perspectives on Future Research","authors":"Andreas KLİNGENBERG","doi":"10.37095/gephyra.1356511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The wealth and possessions of Roman senators in the imperial period consisted predominantly in land property, as emphasized by Pliny the Younger (epist. 3,19,8). It is mainly epigraphic documents that give us information about the location and sometimes extent of senatorial land ownership. Especially in Asia Minor there is plenty of evidence, of which Helmut Halfmann already compiled quite some in 1979. Since then many new testimonies have been discovered and published. Apart from that, further, earlier published evidence for the land ownership of senators whose origin was not in Asia Minor can be added. However, a systematic study of senatorial land ownership in Asia Minor as a whole is not yet at hand. 
 The paper provides prolegomena to such a study. I thus give an overview of the extent, distribution and background of senatorial land ownership in Asia Minor. Rarely is this property so clearly indicated as in the land register of Magnesia (I.Magnesia 122, c2). Usually only the combination of different inscriptions confirms the identification of senatorial landowners. Therefore, I outline methodological guidelines on how to obtain reliable findings from such information. Landed properties could change owners, senatorial estates often passed into the possession of the emperors, which is much better researched. Important questions relate to continuity of ownership within a family and to the circumstances of changes of possession. In this context, I also discuss how the senators came to their property. Especially in the case of senators from other parts of the Roman Empire, the question arises as to why and how they acquired landed property in Asia Minor.","PeriodicalId":37539,"journal":{"name":"Gephyra","volume":"302 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gephyra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.1356511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The wealth and possessions of Roman senators in the imperial period consisted predominantly in land property, as emphasized by Pliny the Younger (epist. 3,19,8). It is mainly epigraphic documents that give us information about the location and sometimes extent of senatorial land ownership. Especially in Asia Minor there is plenty of evidence, of which Helmut Halfmann already compiled quite some in 1979. Since then many new testimonies have been discovered and published. Apart from that, further, earlier published evidence for the land ownership of senators whose origin was not in Asia Minor can be added. However, a systematic study of senatorial land ownership in Asia Minor as a whole is not yet at hand. The paper provides prolegomena to such a study. I thus give an overview of the extent, distribution and background of senatorial land ownership in Asia Minor. Rarely is this property so clearly indicated as in the land register of Magnesia (I.Magnesia 122, c2). Usually only the combination of different inscriptions confirms the identification of senatorial landowners. Therefore, I outline methodological guidelines on how to obtain reliable findings from such information. Landed properties could change owners, senatorial estates often passed into the possession of the emperors, which is much better researched. Important questions relate to continuity of ownership within a family and to the circumstances of changes of possession. In this context, I also discuss how the senators came to their property. Especially in the case of senators from other parts of the Roman Empire, the question arises as to why and how they acquired landed property in Asia Minor.
帝国时期小亚细亚的元老院等级——问题现状、方法问题和未来研究展望
正如小普林尼所强调的那样,帝国时期罗马元老院的财富和财产主要是土地财产。3、19日8)。它主要是铭文文件,给我们提供了关于元老院土地所有权的位置和有时范围的信息。特别是在小亚细亚,有大量的证据,Helmut Halfmann在1979年已经汇编了相当多的证据。从那时起,许多新的证词被发现和发表。除此之外,还可以补充先前公布的证据,证明原籍不在小亚细亚的元老拥有土地。然而,对整个小亚细亚元老院土地所有权的系统研究尚未出现。& # x0D;本文为这一研究提供了一些提示。因此,我概述了小亚细亚元老院土地所有权的范围、分布和背景。很少有像Magnesia的土地登记簿(I.Magnesia 122, c2)那样清楚地表明这一属性。通常只有不同铭文的组合才能确认元老院地主的身份。因此,我概述了如何从这些信息中获得可靠结果的方法指南。地产可以换主,元老院的地产通常归皇帝所有,这方面的研究更深入。重要的问题涉及家庭所有权的连续性以及财产变更的情况。在此背景下,我也讨论了元老们是如何来到他们的财产的。特别是对于来自罗马帝国其他地区的元老们来说,他们为什么以及如何在小亚细亚获得土地的问题就产生了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gephyra
Gephyra Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gephyra - a Journal for the Ancient History and Cultures of the Eastern Mediterranean - is an open access publication platform for articles from all fields of research into Asia Minor and the Eastern Mediterranean, insofar as they shed new light on the history and culture of this geographical and historical region. Scope: Epigraphic, archaeological, numismatic and art historical contributions, commented and evaluated material presentations, as well as historical reflections and essays are all equally welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信