Transitions in education: Educators, digitalisation, and datafication

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jennifer Feldman, Laura Czerniewicz
{"title":"Transitions in education: Educators, digitalisation, and datafication","authors":"Jennifer Feldman, Laura Czerniewicz","doi":"10.17159/2520-9868/i92a03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores educators' experiences of the digitalisation and datafication of teaching and learning that intensified during the Covid-19 pandemic. It focuses on the transitions, responses, and agency of educators as the rules of their professional world changed. The paper uses data from four focus group discussions with 19 educators from diverse South African contexts including urban and rural, affluent and poor environments, schools, colleges, and universities. Framed by Archer's (2007, 2012) nuanced concepts of agency, the paper shows how educators working within the structures of very stratified education contexts negotiated their educational projects while the rules were being rewritten as the socio-technical systems in which they taught were-and are-being transformed in ways that are not yet fully understood. Control of the teaching and learning environment has been a key issue as it has become clear how much is outside the jurisdiction of individual educators: the entrenching of big tech in education, stakeholder arrangements including private-state partnerships, and the selection of digital tools and systems. Despite not being explicitly aware of the business models that shape the datafication of their teaching systems, educators discussed their discomfort and unease- while remaining reflexive and active agents showing the ability to reorientate a course of action even within narrow and covert parameters.","PeriodicalId":15568,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i92a03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores educators' experiences of the digitalisation and datafication of teaching and learning that intensified during the Covid-19 pandemic. It focuses on the transitions, responses, and agency of educators as the rules of their professional world changed. The paper uses data from four focus group discussions with 19 educators from diverse South African contexts including urban and rural, affluent and poor environments, schools, colleges, and universities. Framed by Archer's (2007, 2012) nuanced concepts of agency, the paper shows how educators working within the structures of very stratified education contexts negotiated their educational projects while the rules were being rewritten as the socio-technical systems in which they taught were-and are-being transformed in ways that are not yet fully understood. Control of the teaching and learning environment has been a key issue as it has become clear how much is outside the jurisdiction of individual educators: the entrenching of big tech in education, stakeholder arrangements including private-state partnerships, and the selection of digital tools and systems. Despite not being explicitly aware of the business models that shape the datafication of their teaching systems, educators discussed their discomfort and unease- while remaining reflexive and active agents showing the ability to reorientate a course of action even within narrow and covert parameters.
教育转型:教育者、数字化和数据化
本文探讨了教育工作者在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间加强教学数字化和数据化的经验。它关注的是教育工作者在他们的专业世界规则发生变化时的转变、反应和代理。本文使用了与来自南非不同背景(包括城市和农村、富裕和贫困环境、学校、学院和大学)的19名教育工作者进行的四次焦点小组讨论的数据。在Archer(2007, 2012)细致入微的代理概念的框架下,本文展示了在分层教育背景的结构中工作的教育工作者如何协商他们的教育项目,而规则被重写为他们所教授的社会技术系统,并且正在以尚未完全理解的方式进行转变。对教学环境的控制一直是一个关键问题,因为有多少东西超出了个人教育工作者的管辖范围已经变得很清楚:大型科技在教育领域的根深蒂固,包括公私伙伴关系在内的利益相关者安排,以及数字工具和系统的选择。尽管没有明确意识到塑造其教学系统数据化的商业模式,教育工作者讨论了他们的不适和不安——同时保持反思和积极的代理,显示出即使在狭窄和隐蔽的参数中也能重新定位行动过程的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Education
Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信