Enhancing inclusive education through active student teacher participation: A case study of a university in Cape Town

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Cina P. Mosito
{"title":"Enhancing inclusive education through active student teacher participation: A case study of a university in Cape Town","authors":"Cina P. Mosito","doi":"10.17159/2520-9868/i92a11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Addressing the needs of a diverse learner population remains one of the most pressing education concerns of the 21st century. One of the issues debated is whether a responsive teacher education curriculum caters for the needs of student teachers, and how effective it is in preparing student teachers for teaching in diverse situations. It is essential to locate this issue within teacher education given the expectations on graduate teachers to deliver socially just pedagogies in school terrains that are often marked by deep inequalities. The Covid-19 pandemic has illuminated these inequalities, which have become the subject of all educational discourses. This study foregrounds student teacher voices regarding how they experienced curriculum reforms towards inclusive education in the Bachelor of Education (BEd) programme at a university in Cape Town, South Africa. Specifically, the study engages with how different modes of curriculum delivery position student teachers as both recipients and co-creators of the intended knowledge and skills-and who can engage in critical interaction with the learning material, and provoke self-scrutiny among student teachers and lecturers. This qualitative interpretivist study was framed around constructs of cognitive apprenticeship, guided participation, participatory appropriation, and border crossing. Data were collected through focus group interviews. It was found that an approach to learning in which student teachers are positioned as knowledge collaborators leads to the meaningful appropriation of some aspects of a curriculum on inclusive education.","PeriodicalId":15568,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i92a11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Addressing the needs of a diverse learner population remains one of the most pressing education concerns of the 21st century. One of the issues debated is whether a responsive teacher education curriculum caters for the needs of student teachers, and how effective it is in preparing student teachers for teaching in diverse situations. It is essential to locate this issue within teacher education given the expectations on graduate teachers to deliver socially just pedagogies in school terrains that are often marked by deep inequalities. The Covid-19 pandemic has illuminated these inequalities, which have become the subject of all educational discourses. This study foregrounds student teacher voices regarding how they experienced curriculum reforms towards inclusive education in the Bachelor of Education (BEd) programme at a university in Cape Town, South Africa. Specifically, the study engages with how different modes of curriculum delivery position student teachers as both recipients and co-creators of the intended knowledge and skills-and who can engage in critical interaction with the learning material, and provoke self-scrutiny among student teachers and lecturers. This qualitative interpretivist study was framed around constructs of cognitive apprenticeship, guided participation, participatory appropriation, and border crossing. Data were collected through focus group interviews. It was found that an approach to learning in which student teachers are positioned as knowledge collaborators leads to the meaningful appropriation of some aspects of a curriculum on inclusive education.
通过学生教师的积极参与加强全纳教育:开普敦一所大学的案例研究
满足多样化学习者群体的需求仍然是21世纪最紧迫的教育问题之一。其中一个争论的问题是,响应式教师教育课程是否满足了学生教师的需求,以及它在培养学生教师在不同情况下的教学能力方面有多有效。鉴于对研究生教师的期望是在往往以严重不平等为特征的学校领域提供社会公正的教学法,因此必须将这一问题定位在教师教育中。2019冠状病毒病大流行揭示了这些不平等现象,这已成为所有教育话语的主题。本研究展望了南非开普敦一所大学教育学士(BEd)课程改革中学生教师对全纳教育的看法。具体而言,该研究涉及不同的课程交付模式如何将学生教师定位为预期知识和技能的接受者和共同创造者-他们可以与学习材料进行批判性互动,并激发学生教师和讲师的自我审查。这一定性解释主义研究围绕认知学徒制、指导性参与、参与性挪用和边界跨越等概念进行。通过焦点小组访谈收集数据。研究发现,将实习教师定位为知识合作者的学习方法会导致对全纳教育课程某些方面的有意义的挪用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Education
Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
35 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信