Comparison Between Eracs and Non Eracs Methods on The Level of Pain and Mobilization in Post-Caesarean Section Patients

Anna Millizia, Teuku Yudhi Iqbal, Nyak Intan Fadhilati
{"title":"Comparison Between Eracs and Non Eracs Methods on The Level of Pain and Mobilization in Post-Caesarean Section Patients","authors":"Anna Millizia, Teuku Yudhi Iqbal, Nyak Intan Fadhilati","doi":"10.29103/averrous.v9i2.11529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean Section (ERACS) is a post-cesarean recovery method that can provide faster functional recovery results and can minimize the occurrence of complications, and reduce hospitalization time. ERACS is considered to be able to reduce pain levels and accelerate early mobilization of patients after delivery better than the non-ERACS method. This study aims to compare ERACS and non-ERACS methods on the level of pain and mobilization in post-cesarean section patients. The method used in this study was observational analytic with a cross-sectional design carried out on 66 respondents at Abby Lhokseumawe Mother Children's Hospital. The results showed that there were differences between the ERACS and non-ERACS methods in terms of pain levels with a p-value of 0.010 (<0.005) and early mobilization with a p-value of 0.000 (<0.005) in post-cesarean section patients which can be concluded that delivery with the ERACS method is better in reducing the degree of pain and accelerating early mobilization compared to non-ERACS methods","PeriodicalId":313760,"journal":{"name":"AVERROUS: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Malikussaleh","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AVERROUS: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Malikussaleh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29103/averrous.v9i2.11529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean Section (ERACS) is a post-cesarean recovery method that can provide faster functional recovery results and can minimize the occurrence of complications, and reduce hospitalization time. ERACS is considered to be able to reduce pain levels and accelerate early mobilization of patients after delivery better than the non-ERACS method. This study aims to compare ERACS and non-ERACS methods on the level of pain and mobilization in post-cesarean section patients. The method used in this study was observational analytic with a cross-sectional design carried out on 66 respondents at Abby Lhokseumawe Mother Children's Hospital. The results showed that there were differences between the ERACS and non-ERACS methods in terms of pain levels with a p-value of 0.010 (<0.005) and early mobilization with a p-value of 0.000 (<0.005) in post-cesarean section patients which can be concluded that delivery with the ERACS method is better in reducing the degree of pain and accelerating early mobilization compared to non-ERACS methods
Eracs与非Eracs方法在剖宫产术后疼痛和活动水平上的比较
Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean Section (ERACS)是一种剖宫产后恢复方法,可以提供更快的功能恢复结果,最大限度地减少并发症的发生,减少住院时间。与非ERACS方法相比,ERACS被认为能够更好地减轻疼痛水平并加速分娩后患者的早期活动。本研究旨在比较ERACS和非ERACS方法对剖宫产术后患者疼痛和活动水平的影响。本研究使用的方法是观察性分析,采用横断面设计对Abby Lhokseumawe妇幼医院的66名受访者进行了调查。结果显示,剖宫产术后患者的疼痛程度与非ERACS分娩方式存在差异,p值为0.010 (<0.005),早期活动的p值为0.000 (<0.005)。由此可见,与非ERACS分娩方式相比,ERACS分娩方式在减轻疼痛程度和加速早期活动方面效果更好
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信