The effect of natural disasters on big bath earnings management of banks: evidence from the 2005 US hurricane season

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Qiurong Yang, Gang Bai
{"title":"The effect of natural disasters on big bath earnings management of banks: evidence from the 2005 US hurricane season","authors":"Qiurong Yang, Gang Bai","doi":"10.1080/00014788.2023.2258781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractWe investigate the effect of the 2005 US hurricane strikes on big bath earnings management in the banking industry. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that banks affected by the hurricanes add more discretionary loan loss provisions (DLLP) after the shock relative to unaffected banks. Further tests suggest that the hurricane-induced DLLP increase is attributable to opportunistic big bath accounting rather than to a precautionary motive. We also show that the effect of the hurricanes on big bath earnings management is more pronounced in banks that were managing earnings upwards more aggressively before the hurricanes.Keywords: big bath earnings managementbankingdiscretionary loan loss provisionsnatural disastersJEL classification: G21M41 AcknowledgementsWe are grateful to Juan Manuel García Lara (the editor) and two anonymous referees for their valuable and constructive suggestions. We also appreciate comments and suggestions from seminar participants at Southwestern University of Finance and Economics.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available from FEMA and the Statistics on Depository Institutions database of the FDIC. These data were derived via https://www.fema.gov/disasters and https: //www.fdic.gov/bank/statistical/.Notes1 Ng and Roychowdhury (Citation2014) point out that the increase in LLPs can increase a bank’s total regulatory capital under certain conditions. We detail these conditions in Section 4.3.1.2 In Section 3.2, we detail the definition of the treatment group (affected banks) and the control group (unaffected banks).3 Following Schüwer et al. (Citation2019), non-performing loans are measured as total assets past due 90 or more days and still accruing interest. Unreported findings indicate that the results are robust when we compute non-performing loans as the sum of total assets past due 30 days or more and still accruing interest and total assets no longer accruing interest.4 In Section 3.3, we detail the procedure of PSM.5 In Section 3.3, we detail the selection of the sample period.6 Data are acquired via https://www.fdic.gov/bank/statistical/.7 Data are acquired via https://www.fema.gov/disasters.8 According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the 2001 recession ended in November 2001, and the 2008 financial crisis started in December 2007. Thus, we limit the sample period to Q1 2002–Q3 2007 to avoid the overlap with two recessions. In the robustness section, we shorten the sample period and the results remain similar.9 Specifically, Size equals the natural logarithm of total assets. Loan (Deposit, CAP) equals total loans (total deposits, the value of equity) divided by total assets. ROA is the return on assets.10 We only include the interaction term in our regressions because we focus on future performance improvement of those treatment banks increasing DLLP in response to the hurricanes. Untabulated findings show that the results are robust when we merely use the sample of the treatment group and examine the effect of DLLP_Pos on ΔROAt+4 and ΔROAt+8, respectively.11 We only consider upward earnings management for four quarters prior to the hurricanes, because upward earnings management before this period might be affected by the reversion of abnormal provisions from previous periods. Therefore, relative to earlier periods, recent upward earnings management is more likely to be reversed by big bath accounting during the hurricanes.12 We obtain the data on realised and unrealised gains and losses on AFS securities from the Bank Regulatory Database of Wharton Research Data Services.13 Untabulated findings indicate that the results are robust to the period of three and four quarters before and after the hurricane season.14 The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data files provide information about the amount of banks’ mortgage loans extended to each county.15 Untabulated findings indicate that our results remain robust when we employ total assets, total loans, and return on assets as matching variables.","PeriodicalId":7054,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and Business Research","volume":"69 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2023.2258781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractWe investigate the effect of the 2005 US hurricane strikes on big bath earnings management in the banking industry. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that banks affected by the hurricanes add more discretionary loan loss provisions (DLLP) after the shock relative to unaffected banks. Further tests suggest that the hurricane-induced DLLP increase is attributable to opportunistic big bath accounting rather than to a precautionary motive. We also show that the effect of the hurricanes on big bath earnings management is more pronounced in banks that were managing earnings upwards more aggressively before the hurricanes.Keywords: big bath earnings managementbankingdiscretionary loan loss provisionsnatural disastersJEL classification: G21M41 AcknowledgementsWe are grateful to Juan Manuel García Lara (the editor) and two anonymous referees for their valuable and constructive suggestions. We also appreciate comments and suggestions from seminar participants at Southwestern University of Finance and Economics.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available from FEMA and the Statistics on Depository Institutions database of the FDIC. These data were derived via https://www.fema.gov/disasters and https: //www.fdic.gov/bank/statistical/.Notes1 Ng and Roychowdhury (Citation2014) point out that the increase in LLPs can increase a bank’s total regulatory capital under certain conditions. We detail these conditions in Section 4.3.1.2 In Section 3.2, we detail the definition of the treatment group (affected banks) and the control group (unaffected banks).3 Following Schüwer et al. (Citation2019), non-performing loans are measured as total assets past due 90 or more days and still accruing interest. Unreported findings indicate that the results are robust when we compute non-performing loans as the sum of total assets past due 30 days or more and still accruing interest and total assets no longer accruing interest.4 In Section 3.3, we detail the procedure of PSM.5 In Section 3.3, we detail the selection of the sample period.6 Data are acquired via https://www.fdic.gov/bank/statistical/.7 Data are acquired via https://www.fema.gov/disasters.8 According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the 2001 recession ended in November 2001, and the 2008 financial crisis started in December 2007. Thus, we limit the sample period to Q1 2002–Q3 2007 to avoid the overlap with two recessions. In the robustness section, we shorten the sample period and the results remain similar.9 Specifically, Size equals the natural logarithm of total assets. Loan (Deposit, CAP) equals total loans (total deposits, the value of equity) divided by total assets. ROA is the return on assets.10 We only include the interaction term in our regressions because we focus on future performance improvement of those treatment banks increasing DLLP in response to the hurricanes. Untabulated findings show that the results are robust when we merely use the sample of the treatment group and examine the effect of DLLP_Pos on ΔROAt+4 and ΔROAt+8, respectively.11 We only consider upward earnings management for four quarters prior to the hurricanes, because upward earnings management before this period might be affected by the reversion of abnormal provisions from previous periods. Therefore, relative to earlier periods, recent upward earnings management is more likely to be reversed by big bath accounting during the hurricanes.12 We obtain the data on realised and unrealised gains and losses on AFS securities from the Bank Regulatory Database of Wharton Research Data Services.13 Untabulated findings indicate that the results are robust to the period of three and four quarters before and after the hurricane season.14 The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data files provide information about the amount of banks’ mortgage loans extended to each county.15 Untabulated findings indicate that our results remain robust when we employ total assets, total loans, and return on assets as matching variables.
自然灾害对银行巨额盈余管理的影响:来自2005年美国飓风季节的证据
摘要本文研究了2005年美国飓风对银行业大额盈余管理的影响。使用差异中的差异方法,我们发现受飓风影响的银行在冲击后相对于未受影响的银行增加了更多的可自由支配贷款损失准备金(DLLP)。进一步的测试表明,飓风导致的DLLP增加是由于机会主义的大浴核算,而不是出于预防动机。我们还表明,飓风对大型银行盈利管理的影响在飓风前更积极地管理盈利的银行中更为明显。关键词:大浴盈余管理银行可自由支配的贷款损失准备金自然灾害jel分类:G21M41致谢感谢Juan Manuel García Lara(编辑)和两位匿名审稿人提出的宝贵和建设性意见。我们也感谢西南财经大学研讨会参与者的意见和建议。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明支持本研究结果的数据来自联邦应急管理局和联邦存款保险公司的存款机构统计数据库。这些数据来源于https://www.fema.gov/disasters和https:// www.fdic.gov/bank/statistical/.Notes1 Ng和Roychowdhury (Citation2014)指出,在一定条件下,llp的增加可以增加银行的总监管资本。在第3.2节中,我们详细说明了实验组(受影响的银行)和对照组(未受影响的银行)的定义根据sch等人(Citation2019)的研究,不良贷款被衡量为逾期90天或更长时间且仍在产生利息的总资产。未报告的研究结果表明,当我们将不良贷款计算为逾期30天或以上仍在计息的总资产和不再计息的总资产的总和时,结果是稳健的在第3.3节中,我们详细介绍了psm的程序。5在第3.3节中,我们详细介绍了样本周期的选择根据美国国家经济研究局(National Bureau of Economic Research)的数据,2001年的经济衰退于2001年11月结束,2008年的金融危机始于2007年12月。因此,我们将样本期限制在2002年第一季度至2007年第三季度,以避免与两次衰退重叠。在稳健性部分,我们缩短了样本周期,结果仍然相似具体来说,规模等于总资产的自然对数。贷款(存款,CAP)等于贷款总额(存款总额,权益价值)除以总资产。ROA是指资产的回报率我们只在回归中包含交互项,因为我们关注的是这些处理库在应对飓风时增加DLLP的未来绩效改善。未列表的结果表明,当我们仅使用治疗组的样本并分别检查DLLP_Pos对ΔROAt+4和ΔROAt+8的影响时,结果是稳健的我们只考虑飓风之前四个季度的盈余管理,因为在此期间之前的盈余管理可能会受到前期异常拨备的影响。因此,相对于早期,最近向上的盈余管理更有可能在飓风期间被大浴会计逆转我们从沃顿研究数据服务的银行监管数据库中获得了AFS证券的已实现和未实现收益和损失的数据。13未列表的发现表明,在飓风季节前后的三季度和四个季度期间,结果是稳健的《住房抵押贷款披露法》(HMDA)的数据文件提供了有关银行向每个县发放的抵押贷款金额的信息未列表的结果表明,当我们采用总资产、总贷款和资产回报率作为匹配变量时,我们的结果仍然稳健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Accounting and Business Research publishes papers containing a substantial and original contribution to knowledge. Papers may cover any area of accounting, broadly defined and including corporate governance, auditing and taxation. However the focus must be accounting, rather than (corporate) finance or general management. Authors may take a theoretical or an empirical approach, using either quantitative or qualitative methods. They may aim to contribute to developing and understanding the role of accounting in business. Papers should be rigorous but also written in a way that makes them intelligible to a wide range of academics and, where appropriate, practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信