{"title":"Confronting historical narratives at the Castillo de San Marcos, Saint Augustine, Florida","authors":"Ivy Chen","doi":"10.1080/14616688.2023.2278119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractRecent research on intangible cultural heritage and the politics of contested sites of memory show that the emotional dimensions of historic places change over time and influence what visitors experience. These dimensions also influence interpretive strategies and historical narratives within sites that are public tourist destinations. In this regard, the Castillo de San Marcos in Saint Augustine, Florida posits significant challenges. As a national monument situated in a scenic, sea-side town, it is a symbol of Spanish Florida and part of the National Park Service (NPS). Conveyed as the place where ‘America begins,’ the lesser-known history is that, when operated under the United States military as Fort Marion (1825–1924), it was the site of three periods of Native American incarceration and the foundation of an educational system for forced assimilation. Within this context, this essay focuses on three questions: How does a governmental entity such as the NPS present complicated histories experienced at tourism sites? In what ways can the Castillo become a place that goes beyond Native American existence or disappearance to present complex narratives of survival and active resistance? And, to what extent can tourism sites become agents of change to confront settler colonialism through centering new voices? Through the concept of survivance and centering Indigenous perspectives and voices, national parks can broaden interpretations and create more complex narratives of history.Keywords: Landscapes of memorynational parkstourismdecolonizationNative Americanssurvivance AcknowledgementsI thank Porchia Moore, Jacque Micieli-Voutsinas, Lourdes Santamaría-Wheeler, and Silvio dos Santos for their support and guidance throughout this project. I also thank the editors of this issue and the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and suggestions towards strengthening this essay.Disclosure statementThe author reports there are no competing interests to declare.Additional informationNotes on contributorsIvy ChenIvy Chen is a graduate student in Latin American Studies at the University of Florida, where she received her MA in Museum Studies (2022). Her research explores national parks and national belonging.","PeriodicalId":48115,"journal":{"name":"Tourism Geographies","volume":"103 S3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism Geographies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2023.2278119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractRecent research on intangible cultural heritage and the politics of contested sites of memory show that the emotional dimensions of historic places change over time and influence what visitors experience. These dimensions also influence interpretive strategies and historical narratives within sites that are public tourist destinations. In this regard, the Castillo de San Marcos in Saint Augustine, Florida posits significant challenges. As a national monument situated in a scenic, sea-side town, it is a symbol of Spanish Florida and part of the National Park Service (NPS). Conveyed as the place where ‘America begins,’ the lesser-known history is that, when operated under the United States military as Fort Marion (1825–1924), it was the site of three periods of Native American incarceration and the foundation of an educational system for forced assimilation. Within this context, this essay focuses on three questions: How does a governmental entity such as the NPS present complicated histories experienced at tourism sites? In what ways can the Castillo become a place that goes beyond Native American existence or disappearance to present complex narratives of survival and active resistance? And, to what extent can tourism sites become agents of change to confront settler colonialism through centering new voices? Through the concept of survivance and centering Indigenous perspectives and voices, national parks can broaden interpretations and create more complex narratives of history.Keywords: Landscapes of memorynational parkstourismdecolonizationNative Americanssurvivance AcknowledgementsI thank Porchia Moore, Jacque Micieli-Voutsinas, Lourdes Santamaría-Wheeler, and Silvio dos Santos for their support and guidance throughout this project. I also thank the editors of this issue and the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and suggestions towards strengthening this essay.Disclosure statementThe author reports there are no competing interests to declare.Additional informationNotes on contributorsIvy ChenIvy Chen is a graduate student in Latin American Studies at the University of Florida, where she received her MA in Museum Studies (2022). Her research explores national parks and national belonging.
期刊介绍:
Tourism Geographies is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on exploring tourism and its related areas of recreation and leisure studies from a geographic perspective. It brings together academic and applied research as well as regional traditions from across the globe. The journal welcomes multidisciplinary approaches from fields such as geography, anthropology, landscape architecture, urban and regional planning, and environmental science and management. Tourism Geographies publishes various types of content including research articles, review articles, commentaries, literature reviews, and news related to affiliated organizations. All research articles and commentaries in the journal undergo a rigorous peer review process, including editor screening and double-anonymized evaluation conducted by two to three anonymous referees.