Developing Language Assessment Literacy of Teachers: needs, effective factors, and constraints

Sabah Al-Akbari
{"title":"Developing Language Assessment Literacy of Teachers: needs, effective factors, and constraints","authors":"Sabah Al-Akbari","doi":"10.20428/jss.v29i3.2165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, developing language assessment literacy (LAL) has become crucial for teachers in enhancing their teaching practices and improving students’ learning outcomes. Empirical research reported that there was a training need for formal education and professional development programs in assessment (Berry et al., 2017; Vogt & Tsagari, 2014). Therefore, this paper reports a systematic review of teachers’ language assessment literacy development: training needs, training effective factors, and language assessment practice constraints. The purpose of the review is to provide an updated overview of the empirical research on language assessment development. I utilized systematic review for social studies using the following steps: forming research questions, choosing the appropriate search terms and strategy, starting the literature search, developing inclusion criteria, determining relevant studies, and extracting data (Petticrew & Roberts, 2006). The search was limited to the 12 years’ publications because there was an increase attention on developing teacher’s language assessment literacy in these years. The selected studies were analyzed using the content analysis approach. The results suggested that teachers needed in-service training in different LAL content areas that varied according to the educational context needs in their countries. The results also revealed that teachers' experience and self-reflection needed to be considered in development programs and teachers should be involved in collaborative learning communities. The collaborative learning communities provided the needed professional support and give the chance for teachers to share their experience. Furthermore, the reality and constraints needed to be recognized as they influenced teachers' assessment practices. Finally, research implications and future research directions on teachers’ language assessment literacy are discussed.","PeriodicalId":53082,"journal":{"name":"mjl@ ldrst ljtm`y@","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mjl@ ldrst ljtm`y@","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20428/jss.v29i3.2165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, developing language assessment literacy (LAL) has become crucial for teachers in enhancing their teaching practices and improving students’ learning outcomes. Empirical research reported that there was a training need for formal education and professional development programs in assessment (Berry et al., 2017; Vogt & Tsagari, 2014). Therefore, this paper reports a systematic review of teachers’ language assessment literacy development: training needs, training effective factors, and language assessment practice constraints. The purpose of the review is to provide an updated overview of the empirical research on language assessment development. I utilized systematic review for social studies using the following steps: forming research questions, choosing the appropriate search terms and strategy, starting the literature search, developing inclusion criteria, determining relevant studies, and extracting data (Petticrew & Roberts, 2006). The search was limited to the 12 years’ publications because there was an increase attention on developing teacher’s language assessment literacy in these years. The selected studies were analyzed using the content analysis approach. The results suggested that teachers needed in-service training in different LAL content areas that varied according to the educational context needs in their countries. The results also revealed that teachers' experience and self-reflection needed to be considered in development programs and teachers should be involved in collaborative learning communities. The collaborative learning communities provided the needed professional support and give the chance for teachers to share their experience. Furthermore, the reality and constraints needed to be recognized as they influenced teachers' assessment practices. Finally, research implications and future research directions on teachers’ language assessment literacy are discussed.
教师语言评价素养的培养:需求、有效因素与制约因素
近年来,发展语言评估素养(LAL)已成为教师加强教学实践和提高学生学习成果的关键。实证研究报告称,在评估中存在对正规教育和专业发展计划的培训需求(Berry et al., 2017;沃格特和Tsagari, 2014)。因此,本文系统回顾了教师的语言评价素养发展:培训需求、培训有效因素、语言评价实践制约因素。本文的目的是对语言评估发展的实证研究提供一个最新的概述。我对社会研究采用了以下步骤:形成研究问题,选择合适的搜索词和策略,开始文献检索,制定纳入标准,确定相关研究,提取数据(Petticrew &罗伯茨,2006)。由于近年来人们越来越关注教师语言评估能力的发展,因此研究仅限于12年的出版物。选取的研究采用内容分析法进行分析。结果表明,教师需要在职培训不同的LAL内容领域,根据其国家的教育背景需要而有所不同。研究结果还表明,教师的经验和自我反思需要在发展计划中加以考虑,教师应该参与到合作学习社区中。协作学习社区提供了所需的专业支持,并为教师提供了分享经验的机会。此外,需要认识到现实和制约因素,因为它们影响到教师的评估做法。最后,对教师语言评价素养的研究意义和未来的研究方向进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信