:Law as Performance: Theatricality, Spectatorship, and the Making of Law in Ancient, Medieval, and Early Modern Europe

IF 0.4 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
MODERN PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.1086/727575
Raphael Magarik
{"title":":<i>Law as Performance: Theatricality, Spectatorship, and the Making of Law in Ancient, Medieval, and Early Modern Europe</i>","authors":"Raphael Magarik","doi":"10.1086/727575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although discussing high-stakes, tense disputation, Peters does not write contentiously. (Though there are points of substantial correction: a remarkable footnote, which begins on page 146 and colonizes the entirety of 147, debunks the claim that the advent of the inquisitorial process in medieval Europe meant the end of “community participation” in trials.) I sometimes felt I was on an impossibly erudite, analytically acute, and very funny tour of European law, as it was practiced: messily, showily, and humanly. Yet Peters challenges two familiar ideas about law, related to each other. First, philosophers from Plato on have argued that law ought not be, or even is the antithesis of, theatricality; second, numerous histories plot toward legal theatricality’s decline, its replacement by a rule-driven, soberly bureaucratic, and modern courtroom.","PeriodicalId":45201,"journal":{"name":"MODERN PHILOLOGY","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although discussing high-stakes, tense disputation, Peters does not write contentiously. (Though there are points of substantial correction: a remarkable footnote, which begins on page 146 and colonizes the entirety of 147, debunks the claim that the advent of the inquisitorial process in medieval Europe meant the end of “community participation” in trials.) I sometimes felt I was on an impossibly erudite, analytically acute, and very funny tour of European law, as it was practiced: messily, showily, and humanly. Yet Peters challenges two familiar ideas about law, related to each other. First, philosophers from Plato on have argued that law ought not be, or even is the antithesis of, theatricality; second, numerous histories plot toward legal theatricality’s decline, its replacement by a rule-driven, soberly bureaucratic, and modern courtroom.
《作为表演的法律:古代、中世纪和近代早期欧洲的戏剧性、观赏性和法律的制定》
虽然讨论的是高风险、紧张的争论,但彼得斯的写作并不充满争议。(尽管书中有一些地方需要进行实质性的更正:从第146页开始的一个引人注目的脚注占据了147页的全部篇幅,它驳斥了中世纪欧洲出现调查程序意味着审判中“社区参与”终结的说法。)有时我觉得自己是在对欧洲法律进行一次不可思议的博学、分析敏锐、非常有趣的旅行,就像它的实践一样:混乱、华丽、人性化。然而,彼得斯挑战了两种彼此相关的熟悉的法律观念。首先,自柏拉图以来的哲学家们认为,法律不应该是戏剧性,甚至不应该是戏剧性的对立面;其次,许多历史都描绘了法律戏剧的衰落,取而代之的是规则驱动的、严肃的官僚主义和现代法庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MODERN PHILOLOGY
MODERN PHILOLOGY Multiple-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Founded in 1903, Modern Philology sets the standard for literary scholarship, history, and criticism. In addition to innovative and scholarly articles (in English) on literature in all modern world languages, MP also publishes insightful book reviews of recent books as well as review articles and research on archival documents. Editor Richard Strier is happy to announce that we now welcome contributions on literature in non-European languages and contributions that productively compare texts or traditions from European and non-European literatures. In general, we expect contributions to be written in (or translated into) English, and we expect quotations from non-English languages to be translated into English as well as reproduced in the original.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信