Saul Jorge Pinto de Carvalho, Fabio Alessandro Muniz Pires, Caroliny Pereira Santos, Chayenne De Lira Ferreira
{"title":"Intoxication of newly implanted coffee plants by simulated drift of the dicamba herbicide","authors":"Saul Jorge Pinto de Carvalho, Fabio Alessandro Muniz Pires, Caroliny Pereira Santos, Chayenne De Lira Ferreira","doi":"10.18406/2316-1817v15nunico20231728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the release of soybean cultivars resistant to the herbicide dicamba, this product should be used more frequently in weed management programs, which may increase the risk of drift to neighboring crops, since the molecules are volatile and might cause damage in non-target plants. This work was developed to evaluate the effects of sub-doses of the herbicide dicamba on young coffee plants, simulating a drift situation. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse, with a randomized block design of eight treatments and five replications. Each plot consisted of a 4 L pot, filled with sieved clayey soil and tanned manure (3:1 v/v), with a seedling of Catuaí IAC 144 coffee. The treatments used were: 0 (control), 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, and 100.0 g ha−1 of dicamba. Plant's percentual phytotoxicity was evaluated up to 49 days after application (DAA), SPAD index (14, 28, and 42 DAA), and dry matter biomass, at 49 DAA. In all evaluations, no differences were observed regarding phytotoxicity for dicamba sub-doses of up to 0.01 g ha−1. The highest doses of dicamba caused visual injuries of up to 31%. At 49 DAA, there were no differences regarding dry matter biomass. Leaf symptoms caused by the herbicide were observed, such as curling, wrinkling, and epinasty. No plant death was observed. Compared to other crops, coffee might be considered more tolerant to sub-doses of dicamba, with adequate recovery capacity for reduced doses of this herbicide.","PeriodicalId":43096,"journal":{"name":"Revista Agrogeoambiental","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Agrogeoambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18406/2316-1817v15nunico20231728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
After the release of soybean cultivars resistant to the herbicide dicamba, this product should be used more frequently in weed management programs, which may increase the risk of drift to neighboring crops, since the molecules are volatile and might cause damage in non-target plants. This work was developed to evaluate the effects of sub-doses of the herbicide dicamba on young coffee plants, simulating a drift situation. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse, with a randomized block design of eight treatments and five replications. Each plot consisted of a 4 L pot, filled with sieved clayey soil and tanned manure (3:1 v/v), with a seedling of Catuaí IAC 144 coffee. The treatments used were: 0 (control), 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, and 100.0 g ha−1 of dicamba. Plant's percentual phytotoxicity was evaluated up to 49 days after application (DAA), SPAD index (14, 28, and 42 DAA), and dry matter biomass, at 49 DAA. In all evaluations, no differences were observed regarding phytotoxicity for dicamba sub-doses of up to 0.01 g ha−1. The highest doses of dicamba caused visual injuries of up to 31%. At 49 DAA, there were no differences regarding dry matter biomass. Leaf symptoms caused by the herbicide were observed, such as curling, wrinkling, and epinasty. No plant death was observed. Compared to other crops, coffee might be considered more tolerant to sub-doses of dicamba, with adequate recovery capacity for reduced doses of this herbicide.
在抗麦草畏的大豆品种释放后,该产品应更频繁地用于杂草管理计划,这可能会增加漂移到邻近作物的风险,因为该分子具有挥发性,可能会对非目标植物造成损害。本研究旨在评估亚剂量除草剂麦草畏对咖啡幼苗的影响,模拟漂移情况。试验在温室内进行,采用随机区组设计,共8个处理,5个重复。每个地块由一个4升的花盆组成,装满筛过的粘土和鞣制肥料(3:1 v/v),并种植Catuaí IAC 144咖啡幼苗。处理剂量分别为:0(对照)、0.0001、0.001、0.01、0.1、1.0、10.0和100.0 g / ha。对施用后49天的植物百分比毒性(DAA)、SPAD指数(14、28和42 DAA)和49 DAA时的干物质生物量进行了评估。在所有评估中,对高达0.01 g ha - 1的麦草畏亚剂量的植物毒性没有观察到差异。最高剂量的麦草畏造成的视觉损伤高达31%。在DAA为49时,干物质生物量没有差异。观察了除草剂引起的叶片症状,如卷曲、起皱和肿胀。未观察到植物死亡。与其他作物相比,咖啡可能被认为对亚剂量的麦草畏更具耐受性,对减少剂量的麦草畏具有足够的恢复能力。