Retrospective Outcome Analysis of Allogenic Bone Graft

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Vikas Maheshwari, Mohit Dhingra, Divyansh Sharma, Aditya K. S. Gowda, Arun Kurmi, Surabhi Das
{"title":"Retrospective Outcome Analysis of Allogenic Bone Graft","authors":"Vikas Maheshwari, Mohit Dhingra, Divyansh Sharma, Aditya K. S. Gowda, Arun Kurmi, Surabhi Das","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1772775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bone bank has become an essential requirement for centers that perform tumor and reconstructive surgeries. It provides allogenic bone procured from cadavers as well as live donors in the form of surgical residues. Thus, we conducted a retrospective observational study on recipients who underwent various reconstructive procedures using fresh frozen allograft obtsined from the live donors through surgical residues in a newly established bone bank. The outcomes of cases operated where allogenic bone grafts were used between January 2018 and November 2020 were analyzed in terms of infection and time taken for the grafts to incorporate, allowing weight-bearing in the lower limbs. A total of 223 grafts were obtained as surgical residues from replacement surgeries and traumatic amputations performed on non-salvageable limbs. Out of these, 70 grafts were transplanted into eligible recipients, who were followed up for at least one year. Among the 70 recipients, 15 were lost to follow-up. The outcome data of the remaining 55 recipients was tabulated, including infections (early, delayed and late) and the achievement of weight-bearing milestones when transplanted in lower limbs. Out of the 55 cases, allografts were used alone in 20 cases, while in 35 cases, they were augmented by implants or cement. Two cases (3.6%) experienced acute infections, and another two cases (3.6%) had chronic infection. The mean time for weight-bearing was found to be 7 months when used alone and 3.5 months when augmented with cement or an implant. Additionally, five patients did not show complete integration of the graft. The results of using allogenic bone graft are quite encouraging, suggesting their potential as biological adjuvants in reconstructive surgeries.","PeriodicalId":22053,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bone bank has become an essential requirement for centers that perform tumor and reconstructive surgeries. It provides allogenic bone procured from cadavers as well as live donors in the form of surgical residues. Thus, we conducted a retrospective observational study on recipients who underwent various reconstructive procedures using fresh frozen allograft obtsined from the live donors through surgical residues in a newly established bone bank. The outcomes of cases operated where allogenic bone grafts were used between January 2018 and November 2020 were analyzed in terms of infection and time taken for the grafts to incorporate, allowing weight-bearing in the lower limbs. A total of 223 grafts were obtained as surgical residues from replacement surgeries and traumatic amputations performed on non-salvageable limbs. Out of these, 70 grafts were transplanted into eligible recipients, who were followed up for at least one year. Among the 70 recipients, 15 were lost to follow-up. The outcome data of the remaining 55 recipients was tabulated, including infections (early, delayed and late) and the achievement of weight-bearing milestones when transplanted in lower limbs. Out of the 55 cases, allografts were used alone in 20 cases, while in 35 cases, they were augmented by implants or cement. Two cases (3.6%) experienced acute infections, and another two cases (3.6%) had chronic infection. The mean time for weight-bearing was found to be 7 months when used alone and 3.5 months when augmented with cement or an implant. Additionally, five patients did not show complete integration of the graft. The results of using allogenic bone graft are quite encouraging, suggesting their potential as biological adjuvants in reconstructive surgeries.
同种异体骨移植的回顾性结果分析
骨库已成为肿瘤和重建手术中心的基本要求。它提供来自尸体的同种异体骨以及手术残留物形式的活体供体。因此,我们对接受各种重建手术的受者进行了回顾性观察研究,这些受者使用新鲜冷冻的同种异体移植物,这些同种异体移植物是通过新建立的骨库中的手术残留物从活体供体中获得的。分析了2018年1月至2020年11月期间使用同种异体骨移植物的病例的结果,包括感染和移植物融入下肢负重所需的时间。在无法修复的肢体上进行的置换手术和创伤性截肢手术中,共有223个移植物作为手术残留物获得。其中,70个移植物被移植到符合条件的受者身上,这些受者被随访了至少一年。在70名受助人中,有15人未能随访。其余55名受者的结局数据被制成表格,包括感染(早期、延迟和晚期)和移植到下肢时达到的负重里程碑。在55例中,20例单独使用同种异体移植物,而35例通过植入物或骨水泥进行增强。急性感染2例(3.6%),慢性感染2例(3.6%)。单独使用时的平均负重时间为7个月,而配合水泥或植入物时的平均负重时间为3.5个月。此外,5例患者未显示移植物完全融合。使用同种异体骨移植物的结果是相当令人鼓舞的,这表明它们在重建手术中作为生物佐剂的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信