Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics ed. by Marcel Danesi (review)

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 N/A PHILOSOPHY
{"title":"Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics ed. by Marcel Danesi (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.59.2.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics ed. by Marcel Danesi Nathan Haydon Marcel Danesi (Ed) Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics Cham, Switzerland: Springer International, 2022, vii + 1383, including index For one acquainted with C.S. Peirce, it is hard to see Springer's recent Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics (editor: Marcel Danesi) through none other than a Peircean lens. Short for the cognitive science of mathematics, such a modern, scientific pursuit into the nature and study of mathematical practice would no doubt be found agreeable to Peirce. The fact that references to Peirce appear often throughout the Handbook is a welcome find, with Peirce's ideas being a key subject of half a dozen chapters, and where a reader of any other chapter may well find further connections to Peirce's ideas. After spending time with the Handbook, it is clear that cognitive mathematics has not only embraced some of Pierce's ideas but may be at an important forefront of Peirce studies. In the end, the field may well be an area a Peircean should pay attention to. The book itself is pitched as a reference volume to the field (p. v) with the necessary background to familiarize oneself with the aims and results. The connection to cognitive science may call to mind detailed cognitive models [Ch. 10–14], theories on the origins of numeracy and other theories behind the biological and evolutionary requirements of mathematical thought [Ch.15–18], and the like. These are all present. But a key theme of the Handbook is to situate mathematics not just within more traditional 'cognitive' faculties and the more formal, i.e. algebraic, presentations of mathematics, but also to place mathematics within other human faculties and practices, from the arts to language [Ch. 19–22], within education and learning more broadly [Ch. 23–26], and in relation to the significant, though at first perhaps less quantitative parts of mathematics, like the use of metaphor, gesture, analogy, [End Page 243] abstraction, as well as further cultural and ethnographic considerations [Ch. 5–8]. The Handbook has explicitly taken a broader, more interdisciplinary approach (p. vi–vii) towards the scientific aspects of mathematical practice—choosing to regulate the study not by antecedently drawn opinions about what mathematics is (or has traditionally been taken to be) but by what future quantifiable and diverse study may come to bear on the practice and have to say about those engaging in it. This broad interdisciplinarity has a pragmatist ring, where theory cannot so easily be separated from the normative, social, and, more generally, the more thoroughly human aspects that we encounter and employ when we engage in it. Two further commitments of cognitive mathematics steer us even closer towards Peirce's views. The first—going back, for example, to Lakoff and Núñez's Where Mathematics Comes From (2000), which is taken to be a key early work in shaping the field—is that mathematics is taken to be a language like any other and as such must be learned and situated within our other cognitive faculties (p. vi, Ch. 4). The second—and largely, one imagines, following from a concern for seeing how mathematics is actually practiced—is that mathematics is essentially diagrammatic, involving as it does experimenting in diagrams and employing other signs (one may think here even of the mathematician sketching equations or geometric figures on a sheet of paper). What is perhaps initially most noteworthy about Peirce's philosophy of mathematics is his early concern for both these aspects of the practice. The book (more like a tome of over 1300 pages) is too large to be covered here in all its aspects, hence the review will focus on those aspects a Peircean or Pragmatist may find of interest. In particular, this review focuses on several of the themes above—situating mathematics more broadly within our everyday (cognitive) lives, the necessarily diagrammatic, fallible, and creative aspects of the practice, and, finally, what these aspects may have to say about Peirce's philosophy more generally, particularly with respect to (scientific) inquiry. A Peircean reader may well begin with Pietarinen's \"Pragmaticism as Philosophy of Cognitive Mathematics\" [Ch. 39] and \"Peirce on Mathematical...","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.59.2.05","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics ed. by Marcel Danesi Nathan Haydon Marcel Danesi (Ed) Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics Cham, Switzerland: Springer International, 2022, vii + 1383, including index For one acquainted with C.S. Peirce, it is hard to see Springer's recent Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics (editor: Marcel Danesi) through none other than a Peircean lens. Short for the cognitive science of mathematics, such a modern, scientific pursuit into the nature and study of mathematical practice would no doubt be found agreeable to Peirce. The fact that references to Peirce appear often throughout the Handbook is a welcome find, with Peirce's ideas being a key subject of half a dozen chapters, and where a reader of any other chapter may well find further connections to Peirce's ideas. After spending time with the Handbook, it is clear that cognitive mathematics has not only embraced some of Pierce's ideas but may be at an important forefront of Peirce studies. In the end, the field may well be an area a Peircean should pay attention to. The book itself is pitched as a reference volume to the field (p. v) with the necessary background to familiarize oneself with the aims and results. The connection to cognitive science may call to mind detailed cognitive models [Ch. 10–14], theories on the origins of numeracy and other theories behind the biological and evolutionary requirements of mathematical thought [Ch.15–18], and the like. These are all present. But a key theme of the Handbook is to situate mathematics not just within more traditional 'cognitive' faculties and the more formal, i.e. algebraic, presentations of mathematics, but also to place mathematics within other human faculties and practices, from the arts to language [Ch. 19–22], within education and learning more broadly [Ch. 23–26], and in relation to the significant, though at first perhaps less quantitative parts of mathematics, like the use of metaphor, gesture, analogy, [End Page 243] abstraction, as well as further cultural and ethnographic considerations [Ch. 5–8]. The Handbook has explicitly taken a broader, more interdisciplinary approach (p. vi–vii) towards the scientific aspects of mathematical practice—choosing to regulate the study not by antecedently drawn opinions about what mathematics is (or has traditionally been taken to be) but by what future quantifiable and diverse study may come to bear on the practice and have to say about those engaging in it. This broad interdisciplinarity has a pragmatist ring, where theory cannot so easily be separated from the normative, social, and, more generally, the more thoroughly human aspects that we encounter and employ when we engage in it. Two further commitments of cognitive mathematics steer us even closer towards Peirce's views. The first—going back, for example, to Lakoff and Núñez's Where Mathematics Comes From (2000), which is taken to be a key early work in shaping the field—is that mathematics is taken to be a language like any other and as such must be learned and situated within our other cognitive faculties (p. vi, Ch. 4). The second—and largely, one imagines, following from a concern for seeing how mathematics is actually practiced—is that mathematics is essentially diagrammatic, involving as it does experimenting in diagrams and employing other signs (one may think here even of the mathematician sketching equations or geometric figures on a sheet of paper). What is perhaps initially most noteworthy about Peirce's philosophy of mathematics is his early concern for both these aspects of the practice. The book (more like a tome of over 1300 pages) is too large to be covered here in all its aspects, hence the review will focus on those aspects a Peircean or Pragmatist may find of interest. In particular, this review focuses on several of the themes above—situating mathematics more broadly within our everyday (cognitive) lives, the necessarily diagrammatic, fallible, and creative aspects of the practice, and, finally, what these aspects may have to say about Peirce's philosophy more generally, particularly with respect to (scientific) inquiry. A Peircean reader may well begin with Pietarinen's "Pragmaticism as Philosophy of Cognitive Mathematics" [Ch. 39] and "Peirce on Mathematical...
Marcel Danesi主编的《认知数学手册》(综述)
《认知数学手册》,瑞士:施普林格国际出版社,2022年,vii + 1383,包括索引对于一个熟悉C.S.皮尔斯的人来说,很难看到施普林格最近的《认知数学手册》(编辑:马塞尔·达内西),而不是通过一个Peircean的镜头。这是数学认知科学的简称,这种对数学本质和数学实践研究的现代科学追求无疑会让皮尔斯感到满意。事实上,参考皮尔斯在整个手册中经常出现,这是一个受欢迎的发现,皮尔斯的思想是六个章节的关键主题,任何其他章节的读者都可以找到与皮尔斯思想的进一步联系。在阅读了这本手册之后,很明显,认知数学不仅接受了皮尔斯的一些观点,而且可能处于皮尔斯研究的重要前沿。最后,这个领域很可能是一个peirean应该注意的领域。这本书本身是作为一个参考书的领域(第v页)与必要的背景,以熟悉自己的目标和结果。与认知科学的联系可能会让人想起详细的认知模型[10-14章],关于计算能力起源的理论,以及数学思维的生物学和进化要求背后的其他理论[15 - 18章],诸如此类。这些都是存在的。但是,《手册》的一个关键主题是,不仅要将数学置于更传统的“认知”能力和更正式的数学(即代数)表达中,还要将数学置于其他人类能力和实践中,从艺术到语言[第19-22章],更广泛地置于教育和学习中[第23-26章],并与数学的重要部分(尽管最初可能较少定量的部分,如隐喻、手势、类比的使用)相关。[结束页243]抽象,以及进一步的文化和民族志考虑[第5-8章]。对于数学实践的科学方面,《手册》明确地采取了更广泛、更跨学科的方法(第6 - 7页)——选择不通过先前关于数学是什么(或传统上被认为是什么)的观点来规范研究,而是通过未来可量化和多样化的研究可能对实践产生影响,并必须对参与其中的人说些什么来规范研究。这种广泛的跨学科性具有实用主义的色彩,理论不能轻易地与规范、社会以及更普遍地说,我们在从事理论研究时遇到和使用的更彻底的人性方面分开。认知数学的两个进一步的承诺使我们更接近Peirce的观点。第一个问题——例如,回到Lakoff和Núñez的《数学从何而来》(2000),这本书被认为是塑造数学领域的关键早期著作——数学被认为是一种像其他任何语言一样的语言,因此必须学习,并置于我们的其他认知能力之中(第6页,第4章)。第二个问题——主要是,人们从关注数学是如何实际应用的角度出发,想象数学本质上是图表化的,包括用图表做实验和使用其他符号(这里甚至可以想到数学家在纸上画出方程或几何图形)。皮尔斯的数学哲学最初最值得注意的可能是他对实践的这两个方面的早期关注。这本书(更像是一本超过1300页的大部头)太大了,无法在这里涵盖所有方面,因此评论将集中在那些Peircean或实用主义者可能感兴趣的方面。特别地,这篇评论集中在上面的几个主题上,将数学更广泛地置于我们的日常(认知)生活中,实践中必然的图表化、错误化和创造性的方面,最后,这些方面可能更普遍地说明皮尔斯的哲学,特别是关于(科学)探究。皮尔斯的读者可以从彼得里宁的《作为认知数学哲学的实用主义》(第39章)和《皮尔斯论数学……》
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society has been the premier peer-reviewed journal specializing in the history of American philosophy since its founding in 1965. Although named for the founder of American pragmatism, American philosophers of all schools and periods, from the colonial to the recent past, are extensively discussed. TCSPS regularly includes essays, and every significant book published in the field is discussed in a review essay. A subscription to the journal includes membership in the Charles S. Peirce Society, which was founded in 1946 by Frederic H. Young. The purpose of the Society is to encourage study of and communication about the work of Peirce and its ongoing influence in the many fields of intellectual endeavor to which he contributed.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信