Spectatorship’s Scenes beside the Screen

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kate J. Russell
{"title":"Spectatorship’s Scenes beside the Screen","authors":"Kate J. Russell","doi":"10.1353/dis.2023.a907674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spectatorship’s Scenes beside the Screen Kate J. Russell (bio) Caetlin Benson-Allott. The Stuff of Spectatorship: Material Cultures of Film and Television. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2021. 354 pages. $85.00 hardcover. $29.95 paperback. Caetlin Benson-Allott’s The Stuff of Spectatorship: Material Cultures of Film and Television is an invigorating study of the material culture that surrounds spectatorial and cinephilic environments, recentering what is taken for granted in spectatorship studies to demonstrate how “stuff” shapes the viewing experience in fundamental yet unacknowledged ways. The book makes a significant intervention into spectatorship studies, arguing that what is often dismissed as peripheral in examinations of viewing environments actually influences and alters how viewers make sense of media objects. This approach accounts for diverse objects and experiences surrounding the scene of the screen, including the format of ephemeral programming listings, the food and intoxicants consumed and their centrality to cinema’s commercial interests, the industrial machinations that dictate accessibility, and the media coverage of violence that creates moral panics. In recentering these marginal [End Page 249] areas of study, Benson-Allott also carefully considers the different viewing subjects that are imagined and created by the material cultures surrounding media, attending to how racialized, gendered, and classed viewers respond to media and its offshoots and are in turn interpellated by them. It is an innovative approach that looks sideways as well as backwards in time, looking at what is beside (and inside) the viewer and the screen when consuming media and its auxiliary products. The introduction lays out the book’s intervention into a number of overlapping areas of study, namely media industry studies, spectatorship and reception studies, new cinema history, and material culture studies.1 This chapter teases out underexplored aspects of these fields of study and expands their parameters to conceptualize creative ways of making sense of media consumption and reception. For instance, The Stuff of Spectatorship is attentive to critiques of apparatus theory and its presumption of a universalized viewing subject, but it also pushes apparatus beyond the technologies through which films are exhibited, incorporating the surrounding material culture into its analysis. This material culture, the inanimate objects that lurk around the scene of spectatorship, have the potential to influence one’s experience of the text, to create distinct meanings, in ways that have not yet been fully explored in studies that attend to either the imagined transcendental subject of apparatus theory or the presumed individualized viewer of reception studies. Benson-Allott introduces her methodology through an exploration of television guides, the ubiquitous accompaniments to home viewing that were so central in deciding what to watch, but as Benson-Allott demonstrates, the differing presentations of this information also influences how viewers interact with it. Rather than assuming that the television guide is simply a neutral tool for planning one’s viewing, Benson-Allott incisively unearths how different iterations of television guides harbor social distinctions related to economic class. The utilitarian TV Week, a free supplementary pullout in regional newspapers, appeals to pragmatism, while the glossy TV Guide, a magazine purchased separately, positions itself as engaging in cultural taste-masking; each therefore serves different class interests and aspirations. This foray into television guides captures Benson-Allott’s overall goal in the book, which is to demonstrate that there are significant stakes in taking seriously seemingly inconsequential aspects of media consumption and examining how they structure our understanding of it in relation to wider sociocultural concerns. The first two chapters tackle how commercial interests dictate [End Page 250] our access to the content we consume and how distribution plays a larger role in how we interpret media than has heretofore been acknowledged in academic studies. Chapter 1 is a case study of Battlestar Galactica’s (2004–2009) inaugural season that complicates our understanding of how different media formats communicate televisual history, heeding new cinema history’s caution against reading film texts as symptomatic of their historical moment.2 Benson-Allott’s nonsymptomatic approach is especially pertinent given that the pilot episode was interrupted in some areas by news bulletins reporting the signing of the Camp David Accords, drawing an uncanny parallel between the fictional depiction of an ostensible peace...","PeriodicalId":40808,"journal":{"name":"Discourse-Journal for Theoretical Studies in Media and Culture","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse-Journal for Theoretical Studies in Media and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dis.2023.a907674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spectatorship’s Scenes beside the Screen Kate J. Russell (bio) Caetlin Benson-Allott. The Stuff of Spectatorship: Material Cultures of Film and Television. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2021. 354 pages. $85.00 hardcover. $29.95 paperback. Caetlin Benson-Allott’s The Stuff of Spectatorship: Material Cultures of Film and Television is an invigorating study of the material culture that surrounds spectatorial and cinephilic environments, recentering what is taken for granted in spectatorship studies to demonstrate how “stuff” shapes the viewing experience in fundamental yet unacknowledged ways. The book makes a significant intervention into spectatorship studies, arguing that what is often dismissed as peripheral in examinations of viewing environments actually influences and alters how viewers make sense of media objects. This approach accounts for diverse objects and experiences surrounding the scene of the screen, including the format of ephemeral programming listings, the food and intoxicants consumed and their centrality to cinema’s commercial interests, the industrial machinations that dictate accessibility, and the media coverage of violence that creates moral panics. In recentering these marginal [End Page 249] areas of study, Benson-Allott also carefully considers the different viewing subjects that are imagined and created by the material cultures surrounding media, attending to how racialized, gendered, and classed viewers respond to media and its offshoots and are in turn interpellated by them. It is an innovative approach that looks sideways as well as backwards in time, looking at what is beside (and inside) the viewer and the screen when consuming media and its auxiliary products. The introduction lays out the book’s intervention into a number of overlapping areas of study, namely media industry studies, spectatorship and reception studies, new cinema history, and material culture studies.1 This chapter teases out underexplored aspects of these fields of study and expands their parameters to conceptualize creative ways of making sense of media consumption and reception. For instance, The Stuff of Spectatorship is attentive to critiques of apparatus theory and its presumption of a universalized viewing subject, but it also pushes apparatus beyond the technologies through which films are exhibited, incorporating the surrounding material culture into its analysis. This material culture, the inanimate objects that lurk around the scene of spectatorship, have the potential to influence one’s experience of the text, to create distinct meanings, in ways that have not yet been fully explored in studies that attend to either the imagined transcendental subject of apparatus theory or the presumed individualized viewer of reception studies. Benson-Allott introduces her methodology through an exploration of television guides, the ubiquitous accompaniments to home viewing that were so central in deciding what to watch, but as Benson-Allott demonstrates, the differing presentations of this information also influences how viewers interact with it. Rather than assuming that the television guide is simply a neutral tool for planning one’s viewing, Benson-Allott incisively unearths how different iterations of television guides harbor social distinctions related to economic class. The utilitarian TV Week, a free supplementary pullout in regional newspapers, appeals to pragmatism, while the glossy TV Guide, a magazine purchased separately, positions itself as engaging in cultural taste-masking; each therefore serves different class interests and aspirations. This foray into television guides captures Benson-Allott’s overall goal in the book, which is to demonstrate that there are significant stakes in taking seriously seemingly inconsequential aspects of media consumption and examining how they structure our understanding of it in relation to wider sociocultural concerns. The first two chapters tackle how commercial interests dictate [End Page 250] our access to the content we consume and how distribution plays a larger role in how we interpret media than has heretofore been acknowledged in academic studies. Chapter 1 is a case study of Battlestar Galactica’s (2004–2009) inaugural season that complicates our understanding of how different media formats communicate televisual history, heeding new cinema history’s caution against reading film texts as symptomatic of their historical moment.2 Benson-Allott’s nonsymptomatic approach is especially pertinent given that the pilot episode was interrupted in some areas by news bulletins reporting the signing of the Camp David Accords, drawing an uncanny parallel between the fictional depiction of an ostensible peace...
屏幕旁的观众场景
凯特·j·拉塞尔(传记)凯特琳·本森-阿洛特。观众的材料:影视的物质文化。伯克利:加州大学出版社,2021年。354页。精装书85.00美元。29.95美元的平装书。Caetlin Benson-Allott的《观众的东西:电影和电视的物质文化》是对围绕着观众和电影爱好者环境的物质文化的一项令人振奋的研究,重新进入观众研究中被认为是理所当然的东西,以展示“东西”如何以基本但未被承认的方式塑造观看体验。这本书对观众研究进行了重大的干预,认为在观看环境的检查中,经常被视为边缘的东西实际上影响并改变了观众对媒体对象的理解。这种方法解释了围绕屏幕场景的各种对象和体验,包括短暂节目列表的格式,消费的食物和麻醉剂及其对电影商业利益的中心地位,决定可访问性的工业阴谋,以及造成道德恐慌的暴力媒体报道。在重新进入这些边缘研究领域时,本森-阿洛特还仔细考虑了围绕媒体的物质文化所想象和创造的不同观看主体,关注了种族化、性别化和阶级化的观众如何回应媒体及其分支,并反过来被媒体询问。这是一种创新的方法,既能看侧面,也能看向后,在消费媒体及其辅助产品时,看观众和屏幕旁边(和里面)的东西。引言部分阐述了本书对一些重叠研究领域的介入,即媒体产业研究、观众观影和接受研究、新电影史和物质文化研究本章梳理了这些研究领域中未被充分探索的方面,并扩展了它们的参数,以概念化理解媒体消费和接受的创造性方法。例如,《观众的物质》关注对装置理论及其对普遍观看主体的假设的批评,但它也将装置超越了电影展示的技术,将周围的物质文化纳入其分析。这种物质文化,潜伏在观众周围的无生命的物体,有可能影响一个人对文本的体验,创造出独特的意义,其方式还没有在研究中得到充分的探索,这些研究要么涉及想象的先验主体,要么涉及接受研究中假定的个性化观众。本森-阿洛特通过对电视指南的探索来介绍她的方法,电视指南是家庭观看时无处不在的陪伴,是决定观看什么节目的核心,但正如本森-阿洛特所展示的那样,这些信息的不同呈现方式也影响了观众与之互动的方式。本森-阿洛特并没有假设电视指南只是一个规划观看的中立工具,而是深刻地揭示了不同版本的电视指南是如何隐藏着与经济阶层相关的社会差异的。实用主义的《电视周刊》(TV Week)是地区报纸的免费增刊,呼吁实用主义,而单独购买的光鲜的《电视指南》(TV Guide)则将自己定位为从事文化品味掩饰;因此,每个人都服务于不同的阶级利益和愿望。这种对电视指南的探索抓住了本森-阿洛特在书中的总体目标,即证明认真对待媒体消费中看似无关紧要的方面,并研究它们如何构建我们对更广泛的社会文化问题的理解,是有重大利害关系的。前两章讨论了商业利益如何决定我们对消费内容的访问,以及分销如何在我们如何解释媒体方面发挥比迄今为止在学术研究中所承认的更大的作用。第一章是对《太空堡垒卡拉狄加》(2004-2009)首季的案例研究,它使我们对不同媒体格式如何传达电视历史的理解变得复杂,并注意到新电影史的警告,即不要将电影文本视为其历史时刻的症状本森-阿洛特的无症状手法尤其贴切,因为试播集在某些地方被报道《戴维营协议》签署的新闻简报打断,这与虚构的表面和平的描述有着不可思议的相似之处……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信