Introduction John Henry Newman: Reading The Times

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 LITERATURE
Michael D. Hurley, Rebekah Lamb
{"title":"Introduction John Henry Newman: Reading The Times","authors":"Michael D. Hurley, Rebekah Lamb","doi":"10.1353/rel.2023.a909151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction John Henry Newman:Reading The Times Michael D. Hurley (bio) and Rebekah Lamb (bio) John Henry Newman (1801-1890) was, Owen Chadwick once remarked, \"an eminent Victorian despite himself\": He wrote two books still regarded as classics of English prose. He led a religious movement in the Church of England which transformed the worship of that Church and helped to alter the ways of other Protestant Churches. He helped Britain to see for the first time since the Reformation that Catholic priests could be as humane, and generous, and unbigoted, as anyone else. He had the most interesting idea of the nature of faith propounded by any thinker of the nineteenth century. He was the first theorist of Christian doctrine to face the challenge of modern historical enquiry. And he was a quiet, unpretentious man of prayer.1 Chadwick emphasizes the many-sidedness of the man and was right to do so. For more than a century, scholarship on Newman has offered valuable accounts of his influence within a variety of fields, from Christian doctrine, ethics, and patristics, to the philosophy of history and education, spiritual devotion, and personalism. While some aspects of his achievement have nonetheless been comparatively neglected (notably, his writings on aesthetics and Christian anthropology, his work in journalism and homiletics, his commitments to pastoral care, friendship, the arts, and child welfare), it seems likely that academic as well as devotional interest in Newman will continue to diversify and grow in the twenty-first century, as already suggested by recent publications from Reinhard Hütter, Guy Nicholls, and Thomas Pfau, to name only a few.2 Newman's beatification in 2010 \"gave opportunities [End Page 1] for new appreciations and re-evaluations,\" Geoffrey Rowell observed, and his canonization in 2019 has done even more to excite interest not only in his life but also in his legacy (he is often called \"the Father of Vatican II\").3 This trend is set to continue if not increase, especially if he is, as seems likely, made a Doctor of the Church. As with Newman's own writing, the spur for this special issue is \"occasional.\" It marks his recent canonization and explores how such an \"eminent Victorian\" could also be an exemplar for the twenty-first century—once again, \"despite himself.\" Newman did not sit easily with suggestions of his sanctity, and he would likely be surprised at the extraordinary and persistent influence of his writings today in such a wide variety of fields. This issue models the breadth and depth of his own approaches, methods, and interests, bringing together scholars from an array of different disciplines, including literary studies, philosophical theology, systematic and historical theology, classics, and psychology. Some contributors are already established Newman scholars; others are new on the scene. Between them they explore a wide array of topics, including his prose and verse styles, pastoral ministry, philosophy of history, aestheticism, devotional imagination, philosophy of education, and his reception by theologians. The issue, following Chadwick's cue, is wide-ranging by design, but with the difference that contributors emphasize especially his relevance today, as a thinker and writer for our times—not least for showing us, in Rowan Williams's words, \"just why the notion of God might matter to the mind and the heart.\"4 Williams's locution captures one of the most remarkable features of Newman's example: that he engaged mind and heart, and indeed both together, as potentially interdependent movements between thought and feeling, faith and reason, governed by a will attuned to the call of conscience. It is this particular \"theology of conscience,\" according to Joseph Ratzinger, that makes Newman one of the most important teachers within church history: \"because he both touches our hearts and enlightens our thinking,\" showing us by this process how to read our own times and personal situations in relation to the metaphysical realities underpinning them.5 For Newman, prayer, thinking, writing, and examining the conscience were distinctive yet interrelated means and modes of reading reality, absorbing the philosophical pattern of attention modeled in Scripture and the lives of the saints. Appropriate to a journal concerned with the interrelations of religion and literature, several contributors take...","PeriodicalId":43443,"journal":{"name":"RELIGION & LITERATURE","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RELIGION & LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rel.2023.a909151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction John Henry Newman:Reading The Times Michael D. Hurley (bio) and Rebekah Lamb (bio) John Henry Newman (1801-1890) was, Owen Chadwick once remarked, "an eminent Victorian despite himself": He wrote two books still regarded as classics of English prose. He led a religious movement in the Church of England which transformed the worship of that Church and helped to alter the ways of other Protestant Churches. He helped Britain to see for the first time since the Reformation that Catholic priests could be as humane, and generous, and unbigoted, as anyone else. He had the most interesting idea of the nature of faith propounded by any thinker of the nineteenth century. He was the first theorist of Christian doctrine to face the challenge of modern historical enquiry. And he was a quiet, unpretentious man of prayer.1 Chadwick emphasizes the many-sidedness of the man and was right to do so. For more than a century, scholarship on Newman has offered valuable accounts of his influence within a variety of fields, from Christian doctrine, ethics, and patristics, to the philosophy of history and education, spiritual devotion, and personalism. While some aspects of his achievement have nonetheless been comparatively neglected (notably, his writings on aesthetics and Christian anthropology, his work in journalism and homiletics, his commitments to pastoral care, friendship, the arts, and child welfare), it seems likely that academic as well as devotional interest in Newman will continue to diversify and grow in the twenty-first century, as already suggested by recent publications from Reinhard Hütter, Guy Nicholls, and Thomas Pfau, to name only a few.2 Newman's beatification in 2010 "gave opportunities [End Page 1] for new appreciations and re-evaluations," Geoffrey Rowell observed, and his canonization in 2019 has done even more to excite interest not only in his life but also in his legacy (he is often called "the Father of Vatican II").3 This trend is set to continue if not increase, especially if he is, as seems likely, made a Doctor of the Church. As with Newman's own writing, the spur for this special issue is "occasional." It marks his recent canonization and explores how such an "eminent Victorian" could also be an exemplar for the twenty-first century—once again, "despite himself." Newman did not sit easily with suggestions of his sanctity, and he would likely be surprised at the extraordinary and persistent influence of his writings today in such a wide variety of fields. This issue models the breadth and depth of his own approaches, methods, and interests, bringing together scholars from an array of different disciplines, including literary studies, philosophical theology, systematic and historical theology, classics, and psychology. Some contributors are already established Newman scholars; others are new on the scene. Between them they explore a wide array of topics, including his prose and verse styles, pastoral ministry, philosophy of history, aestheticism, devotional imagination, philosophy of education, and his reception by theologians. The issue, following Chadwick's cue, is wide-ranging by design, but with the difference that contributors emphasize especially his relevance today, as a thinker and writer for our times—not least for showing us, in Rowan Williams's words, "just why the notion of God might matter to the mind and the heart."4 Williams's locution captures one of the most remarkable features of Newman's example: that he engaged mind and heart, and indeed both together, as potentially interdependent movements between thought and feeling, faith and reason, governed by a will attuned to the call of conscience. It is this particular "theology of conscience," according to Joseph Ratzinger, that makes Newman one of the most important teachers within church history: "because he both touches our hearts and enlightens our thinking," showing us by this process how to read our own times and personal situations in relation to the metaphysical realities underpinning them.5 For Newman, prayer, thinking, writing, and examining the conscience were distinctive yet interrelated means and modes of reading reality, absorbing the philosophical pattern of attention modeled in Scripture and the lives of the saints. Appropriate to a journal concerned with the interrelations of religion and literature, several contributors take...
约翰·亨利·纽曼:阅读时代
约翰·亨利·纽曼(1801-1890)被欧文·查德威克评价为“一位杰出的维多利亚人”:他写的两本书至今仍被视为英国散文的经典。他在英国国教会领导了一场宗教运动,改变了该教会的崇拜方式,并帮助改变了其他新教教会的方式。自宗教改革以来,他帮助英国人第一次看到天主教牧师可以像其他人一样仁慈、慷慨、不偏执。他对信仰本质的看法是十九世纪所有思想家中最有趣的。他是第一个面对现代历史调查挑战的基督教教义理论家。他是一个安静、朴实无华的祈祷者一个多世纪以来,纽曼的学术研究提供了他在各个领域的影响力的宝贵账户,从基督教教义,伦理学,教父,历史和教育的哲学,精神奉献和个人主义。尽管他的成就的某些方面相对来说被忽视了(特别是,他关于美学和基督教人类学的著作,他在新闻和讲道方面的工作,他对教牧者关怀、友谊、艺术和儿童福利的承诺),但在21世纪,学术和宗教对纽曼的兴趣似乎将继续多样化和增长,正如莱因哈德·哈特、盖伊·尼科尔斯和托马斯·弗乌最近的出版物所表明的那样。这里仅举几个例子杰弗里·罗威尔(Geoffrey Rowell)指出,纽曼在2010年被册封为真福,“为新的欣赏和重新评估提供了机会”,而他在2019年被封为真福,不仅激发了人们对他的生活的兴趣,也激发了人们对他的遗产的兴趣(他通常被称为“梵二之父”)这一趋势即使没有增加,也将继续下去,特别是如果他被任命为教会博士(看起来很有可能)的话。与纽曼自己的写作一样,本期特刊的灵感也是“偶然的”。它标志着他最近被封为圣徒,并探索了这样一个“杰出的维多利亚时代”如何也能成为21世纪的典范——再一次,“尽管他自己”。纽曼并没有轻易接受他的神圣性,他可能会对他的作品在今天如此广泛的领域中所产生的非凡而持久的影响感到惊讶。这个问题模拟了他自己的方法、方法和兴趣的广度和深度,汇集了来自一系列不同学科的学者,包括文学研究、哲学神学、系统和历史神学、经典和心理学。一些贡献者是已经成立的纽曼学者;还有一些是新出现的。在他们之间,他们探讨了一系列广泛的主题,包括他的散文和诗歌风格,田园事工,历史哲学,唯美主义,虔诚的想象,教育哲学,以及神学家对他的接受。这个问题,按照查德威克的提示,被设计为广泛的,但不同的是,贡献者特别强调他今天的相关性,作为我们这个时代的思想家和作家——不仅仅是向我们展示,用罗文·威廉姆斯的话来说,“为什么上帝的概念可能对思想和心灵很重要。”威廉姆斯的措辞抓住了纽曼榜样的一个最显著的特点:他把头脑和心灵结合起来,实际上两者结合在一起,作为思想与情感、信仰与理性之间潜在的相互依存的运动,由一种与良心的召唤相协调的意志所支配。根据约瑟夫·拉辛格(Joseph Ratzinger)的说法,正是这种特殊的“良心神学”使纽曼成为教会历史上最重要的教师之一:“因为他既触动了我们的心灵,又启发了我们的思想”,通过这个过程向我们展示了如何阅读我们自己的时代和个人情况,以及与支撑它们的形而上学现实有关的情况对纽曼来说,祈祷、思考、写作和审视良心是独特而又相互关联的阅读现实的手段和模式,吸收了圣经和圣徒生活中所塑造的哲学模式的注意力。对于一本关注宗教与文学相互关系的杂志来说,几位撰稿人采取了……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信