Shakespearean Resonances in Contemporary British Drama: Political and Adaptational Borders in William Shakespeare’s Macbeth and David Greig’s Dunsinane

Anja Hartl
{"title":"Shakespearean Resonances in Contemporary British Drama: Political and Adaptational Borders in William Shakespeare’s Macbeth and David Greig’s Dunsinane","authors":"Anja Hartl","doi":"10.1353/shb.2023.a907991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Using Wai Chee Dimock’s theory of “resonance,” this article argues that the potential of Shakespeare’s works to reverberate across centuries and across contexts resides not so much in their universality as in their historical specificity and therefore in the ways in which the meaning and significance of the plays have necessarily changed over time. This argument is illustrated through Scottish playwright David Greig’s 2010 play Dunsinane , a sequel to Shakespeare’s Macbeth . Dimock’s concept of resonance helps to identify specific concerns that the two plays share—above all, an interest in nationhood that is expressed through the border. At the same time, it draws attention to Dunsinane ’s considerable dissonances with Macbeth , which are above all evident in Greig’s rewriting of major parts of Shakespeare’s plot. As such, the border is not only a central theme and aesthetic device in both plays, but also an apt metaphor for Greig’s adaptational approach. As an example of a textual borderscape (in Chiara Brambilla’s sense of the term), Dunsinane probes the borders of adaptation—and of adapting Shakespeare—in the current moment.","PeriodicalId":304234,"journal":{"name":"Shakespeare Bulletin","volume":"197 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shakespeare Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/shb.2023.a907991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Using Wai Chee Dimock’s theory of “resonance,” this article argues that the potential of Shakespeare’s works to reverberate across centuries and across contexts resides not so much in their universality as in their historical specificity and therefore in the ways in which the meaning and significance of the plays have necessarily changed over time. This argument is illustrated through Scottish playwright David Greig’s 2010 play Dunsinane , a sequel to Shakespeare’s Macbeth . Dimock’s concept of resonance helps to identify specific concerns that the two plays share—above all, an interest in nationhood that is expressed through the border. At the same time, it draws attention to Dunsinane ’s considerable dissonances with Macbeth , which are above all evident in Greig’s rewriting of major parts of Shakespeare’s plot. As such, the border is not only a central theme and aesthetic device in both plays, but also an apt metaphor for Greig’s adaptational approach. As an example of a textual borderscape (in Chiara Brambilla’s sense of the term), Dunsinane probes the borders of adaptation—and of adapting Shakespeare—in the current moment.
当代英国戏剧中的莎士比亚共鸣:威廉·莎士比亚的《麦克白》和大卫·格雷格的《邓西南》的政治和改编边界
摘要:本文运用魏志迪莫克的“共鸣”理论,认为莎士比亚的作品之所以能在几个世纪和不同的语境中产生共鸣,与其说是由于它们的普遍性,不如说是由于它们的历史特殊性,因此这些戏剧的意义和意义必然会随着时间的推移而发生变化。苏格兰剧作家大卫·格雷格2010年的戏剧《Dunsinane》阐释了这一观点,这是莎士比亚《麦克白》的续集。迪莫克的共鸣概念有助于确定这两部戏剧共同关注的具体问题——最重要的是,通过边界表达的对国家的兴趣。与此同时,它也引起了人们对邓西内与麦克白之间相当大的不协调的注意,这在格雷格对莎士比亚主要情节的改写中尤为明显。因此,边界不仅是两部戏剧的中心主题和美学手段,也是格雷格改编方法的恰当隐喻。作为文本边界景观(Chiara Brambilla对这个词的理解)的一个例子,Dunsinane在当下探索了改编的边界——以及改编莎士比亚的边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信