Seeing Red: Indigenous Land, American Expansion, and the Political Economy of Plunder in North America by Michael John Witgen (review)

{"title":"Seeing Red: Indigenous Land, American Expansion, and the Political Economy of Plunder in North America by Michael John Witgen (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.2979/imh.2023.a883496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Seeing Red: Indigenous Land, American Expansion, and the Political Economy of Plunder in North America by Michael John Witgen John P. Bowes Seeing Red: Indigenous Land, American Expansion, and the Political Economy of Plunder in North America By Michael John Witgen (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. Pp. vii, 366. Notes, illustrations, appendix, index. $34.95.) In the early pages of Seeing Red, Michael Witgen explains that citizens of the United States have long imagined their nation as a postcolonial state, a new entity born out of an anti-colonial revolution. This conception enabled them to envision their new republic as one untroubled by the trappings of colonialism and empire. As he notes, however, this constructed image of a postcolonial state belies a powerful truth. Indeed, when framed within the Indigenous history of the Old Northwest territories, the framework of Native American policies implemented in the early American republic illustrates the power and reach of a colonial power built on what Witgen dubs the \"political economy of plunder,\" comprised of treaties, land cessions, and annuities (p. 19). In the seven primary chapters that follow, Witgen uses the Anishinaabeg experience in Michigan and Wisconsin as a lens to scrutinize the impact of this plunder, from the early 1800s through the 1850s. The conclusion he reaches is clear: the United States was, and continues to be, a colonial power built on the economic exploitation of Indigenous people. Over the course of the book, Witgen examines an important paradox. Americans viewed the disappearance of Native peoples as inevitable, yet Indigenous imagery became central to the burgeoning American identity fashioned in public spaces. Just as important, the ongoing presence of Native communities in Michigan Territory, and other sites of western expansion, was central to the economy of the colonial society. As Witgen describes it, treaties like those signed in 1817, at the foot of the rapids of the St. Mary's River, or at Saginaw in 1819, created economic relationships that colonized the region and its peoples. Treaties did not just fuel real estate booms through land cessions. These agreements established annuity payments and the promise of goods that sparked regional economies, as merchants profited by selling supplies to Native individuals and communities. When the tides of dispossession and expulsion began to wane, therefore, white settlers still found financial benefit in the Native peoples who remained in the region and in the resources they retained. People and relationships were central to the implementation of these policies, and Seeing Red effectively explores the connections and relative influence of the mixed-descent population that originated from the fur trade that had long permeated the region. More than just interpreters or coureurs de bois, mixed-descent men [End Page 97] and women were economic, diplomatic, and social sinews, whose influence made it necessary for government officials to engage carefully in matters of race and identity. While the United States wanted to replace Native people with white settlers, Native communities used treaties to remain in Michigan; and as a result, the mixed-descent population factored into regional politics and economics. As American expansion advanced in time and place, the status of mixed descent men and women \"vacillated between citizens and racialized colonial subjects\" (p. 320). This vacillation meant that they could be the victim or the beneficiary of the plunder, a difference that could depend on choice or circumstance. Towards the end of the concluding chapter, Witgen writes, \"Native peoples as well as Native land had become a source of wealth creation for American settlers\" (p. 336). That phrase underscores the core argument of Seeing Red. Witgen has written an excellent book that weaves together the formation of an American identity built on Native imagery, the ongoing belief in Native disappearance, the consistent push for Native dispossession and removal, and the pervasive assertions of racial superiority and difference. Yet, it is his explanation of plunder that proves most powerful, and is why Seeing Red is a must read for those seeking to understand more fully the nature of this American nation and the ongoing power of its colonial enterprise. John P. Bowes Eastern Kentucky University Copyright © 2023 Trustees of Indiana University","PeriodicalId":81518,"journal":{"name":"Indiana magazine of history","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana magazine of history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/imh.2023.a883496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Seeing Red: Indigenous Land, American Expansion, and the Political Economy of Plunder in North America by Michael John Witgen John P. Bowes Seeing Red: Indigenous Land, American Expansion, and the Political Economy of Plunder in North America By Michael John Witgen (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. Pp. vii, 366. Notes, illustrations, appendix, index. $34.95.) In the early pages of Seeing Red, Michael Witgen explains that citizens of the United States have long imagined their nation as a postcolonial state, a new entity born out of an anti-colonial revolution. This conception enabled them to envision their new republic as one untroubled by the trappings of colonialism and empire. As he notes, however, this constructed image of a postcolonial state belies a powerful truth. Indeed, when framed within the Indigenous history of the Old Northwest territories, the framework of Native American policies implemented in the early American republic illustrates the power and reach of a colonial power built on what Witgen dubs the "political economy of plunder," comprised of treaties, land cessions, and annuities (p. 19). In the seven primary chapters that follow, Witgen uses the Anishinaabeg experience in Michigan and Wisconsin as a lens to scrutinize the impact of this plunder, from the early 1800s through the 1850s. The conclusion he reaches is clear: the United States was, and continues to be, a colonial power built on the economic exploitation of Indigenous people. Over the course of the book, Witgen examines an important paradox. Americans viewed the disappearance of Native peoples as inevitable, yet Indigenous imagery became central to the burgeoning American identity fashioned in public spaces. Just as important, the ongoing presence of Native communities in Michigan Territory, and other sites of western expansion, was central to the economy of the colonial society. As Witgen describes it, treaties like those signed in 1817, at the foot of the rapids of the St. Mary's River, or at Saginaw in 1819, created economic relationships that colonized the region and its peoples. Treaties did not just fuel real estate booms through land cessions. These agreements established annuity payments and the promise of goods that sparked regional economies, as merchants profited by selling supplies to Native individuals and communities. When the tides of dispossession and expulsion began to wane, therefore, white settlers still found financial benefit in the Native peoples who remained in the region and in the resources they retained. People and relationships were central to the implementation of these policies, and Seeing Red effectively explores the connections and relative influence of the mixed-descent population that originated from the fur trade that had long permeated the region. More than just interpreters or coureurs de bois, mixed-descent men [End Page 97] and women were economic, diplomatic, and social sinews, whose influence made it necessary for government officials to engage carefully in matters of race and identity. While the United States wanted to replace Native people with white settlers, Native communities used treaties to remain in Michigan; and as a result, the mixed-descent population factored into regional politics and economics. As American expansion advanced in time and place, the status of mixed descent men and women "vacillated between citizens and racialized colonial subjects" (p. 320). This vacillation meant that they could be the victim or the beneficiary of the plunder, a difference that could depend on choice or circumstance. Towards the end of the concluding chapter, Witgen writes, "Native peoples as well as Native land had become a source of wealth creation for American settlers" (p. 336). That phrase underscores the core argument of Seeing Red. Witgen has written an excellent book that weaves together the formation of an American identity built on Native imagery, the ongoing belief in Native disappearance, the consistent push for Native dispossession and removal, and the pervasive assertions of racial superiority and difference. Yet, it is his explanation of plunder that proves most powerful, and is why Seeing Red is a must read for those seeking to understand more fully the nature of this American nation and the ongoing power of its colonial enterprise. John P. Bowes Eastern Kentucky University Copyright © 2023 Trustees of Indiana University
《看到红色:土著土地、美国扩张和北美掠夺的政治经济学》,作者:迈克尔·约翰·维根(书评)
《看到红色:北美土著土地、美国扩张和掠夺的政治经济学》作者:迈克尔·约翰·维根约翰·p·鲍斯《看到红色:北美土著土地、美国扩张和掠夺的政治经济学》作者:迈克尔·约翰·维根(教堂山:北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2022年)。第七页,366页。注释、插图、附录、索引。34.95美元)。在《看到红色》的开头几页,迈克尔·维根解释说,美国公民长期以来一直把他们的国家想象成一个后殖民国家,一个从反殖民革命中诞生的新实体。这种观念使他们能够设想他们的新共和国是一个不受殖民主义和帝国的束缚的国家。然而,正如他所指出的,这种构建的后殖民国家形象掩盖了一个强有力的事实。事实上,当把旧西北地区的土著历史纳入框架时,美国共和国早期实施的印第安人政策框架说明了殖民权力的权力和范围,这些权力和范围建立在维特根称之为“掠夺的政治经济”的基础上,包括条约、土地割让和年金(第19页)。在接下来的七个主要章节中,维根以密歇根州和威斯康星州的阿尼什纳贝格的经历为视角,审视了从19世纪初到19世纪50年代这种掠夺的影响。他得出的结论是明确的:美国过去是,并将继续是一个建立在对土著人民经济剥削基础上的殖民大国。在书中,维根研究了一个重要的悖论。美国人认为土著民族的消失是不可避免的,然而土著形象成为公共空间塑造的新兴美国身份的核心。同样重要的是,在密歇根地区和其他西部扩张地区,土著社区的持续存在对殖民社会的经济至关重要。正如维根所描述的那样,1817年在圣玛丽河(St. Mary’s River)急流脚下或1819年在萨吉诺(Saginaw)签署的条约,创造了使该地区及其人民成为殖民地的经济关系。条约不仅通过土地出让推动了房地产的繁荣。这些协议建立了年金支付和商品承诺,刺激了地区经济,因为商人通过向土著个人和社区出售供应品获利。因此,当剥夺和驱逐的浪潮开始减弱时,白人定居者仍然从留在该地区的土著人民和他们保留的资源中找到了经济利益。人和关系是实施这些政策的核心,《看见红色》有效地探索了来自该地区长期渗透的毛皮贸易的混合血统人口的联系和相对影响。混血男性和女性不仅仅是口译员或boreurs,他们还是经济、外交和社会的中坚力量,他们的影响使得政府官员有必要认真对待种族和身份问题。虽然美国想用白人定居者取代土著居民,但土著社区利用条约留在密歇根州;因此,混合血统的人口影响了地区政治和经济。随着美国在时间和地点上的扩张,混血男女的地位“在公民和种族化的殖民地臣民之间摇摆不定”(第320页)。这种摇摆意味着他们可能是掠夺的受害者,也可能是受益者,这种差异可能取决于选择或环境。在最后一章的末尾,维根写道:“土著人民和土著土地已经成为美国定居者创造财富的源泉”(第336页)。这句话强调了《看见红色》的核心论点。维根写了一本优秀的书,它将建立在土著形象之上的美国身份的形成、对土著消失的持续信念、对土著剥夺和迁移的持续推动,以及对种族优越感和差异的普遍主张编织在一起。然而,事实证明,他对掠夺的解释是最有力的,这就是为什么《看到红色》是那些想要更全面地了解这个美国国家的本质及其殖民事业的持续力量的人的必读之作。版权所有©2023印第安纳大学董事会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信