Not Made by Slaves: Ethical Capitalism in the Age of Abolition by Bronwen Everill (review)

{"title":"Not Made by Slaves: Ethical Capitalism in the Age of Abolition by Bronwen Everill (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.2979/imh.2023.a883498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Not Made by Slaves: Ethical Capitalism in the Age of Abolition by Bronwen Everill A. Glenn Crothers Not Made by Slaves: Ethical Capitalism in the Age of Abolition By Bronwen Everill (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2020. Pp. 328. Notes, index. $39.95.) Today, consumer boycotts have become a common feature of progressive and conservative political movements. Bronwen Everill's Not Made by Slaves traces the origins of such campaigns to the abolitionist movement, which, in the late eighteenth century, first attacked the slave trade and later sought to end slavery. Her study identifies two elements of the effort to create a commercial system free from the taint of slavery: free produce, which placed culpability for slavery on the consumer; and legitimate commerce, which sought to induce producers, particularly in West Africa, to abandon the slave trade for alternative sources of income. The commercial abolitionists who led the drive for a more ethical commerce sought to reform capitalism, to end what they considered its greatest moral stain, but in the process their efforts revealed the contradictions that lay at the heart of \"ethical capitalism.\" They embraced tactics that undermined slavery and simultaneously maintained profitability, but these tactics also created new ethical conundrums that opened the campaign to charges of self-interest and hypocrisy. Commercial abolitionists successfully highlighted the moral responsibility of British and American consumers and West African producers for sustaining slavery, but their vision of a reformed capitalism also helped create a global division of labor in which Africa and Asia became economic monocultures exploited by Western manufacturing nations. Everill's most significant insight lies in her analysis of the integral role West Africa played in the campaigns to combat slavery and the slave trade. Envisioning a truly Atlantic world, or at least North Atlantic world, she argues that in response to slavery and the consumer revolution it made possible, West Africans organized consumer boycotts, supported political change, and participated in religious revivals unique to their localities, but [End Page 100] also paralleling those taking place in Europe and the Americas. Across seven chapters, Everill explores the various elements of commercial abolitionists' efforts to end African and European participation in slavery: the consumer revolution of the eighteenth century and consumers' growing sense of responsibility for slavery's centrality in the production of staples like sugar and cotton; the creation of ethical brands recognized as produced by free labor; the crucial function of credit, particularly in West Africa, in promoting legitimate commerce; the role of government contracts and tariffs in promoting abolitionists' goals; and how nationalist concerns shaped reformers' tactics. Commercial abolitionists insisted that ending slave-produced consumption and replacing it with free produce would benefit everyone. Africans would have profitable alternatives to slave trading; consumers would enjoy lower prices because of the presumed efficiency of wage labor; and British and American merchants and manufacturers would profit from ethical trade with Africa. But such arguments ignored the \"negative externalities\" of capitalism: that the market system always produces winners and losers. The strategies commercial abolitionists employed to promote legitimate commerce and ensure profitability—creating debt-fueled monopsonies in West Africa; countenancing \"domestic slavery\" and indentured labor in Africa and Asia to lower prices for British and American consumers; seeking government contracts and tariff protection while embracing free trade principles; and, by the 1860s, endorsing an imperial world in which the African and Asian periphery produced agricultural goods for the European and American manufacturing core—revealed the dilemmas created by the drive for ethical commerce. As Everill notes, \"resolving the contradictions of ethical capitalism was, and is, nearly impossible\" (p. 241). The exhaustively researched Not Made by Slaves is part of a growing effort by historians to explore the rise of consumer activism, but Everill's challenging study ultimately reveals that \"ethical capitalism\" was (and remains) at heart an oxymoron. [End Page 101] A. Glenn Crothers University of Louisville Copyright © 2023 Trustees of Indiana University","PeriodicalId":81518,"journal":{"name":"Indiana magazine of history","volume":"201 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana magazine of history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/imh.2023.a883498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Not Made by Slaves: Ethical Capitalism in the Age of Abolition by Bronwen Everill A. Glenn Crothers Not Made by Slaves: Ethical Capitalism in the Age of Abolition By Bronwen Everill (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2020. Pp. 328. Notes, index. $39.95.) Today, consumer boycotts have become a common feature of progressive and conservative political movements. Bronwen Everill's Not Made by Slaves traces the origins of such campaigns to the abolitionist movement, which, in the late eighteenth century, first attacked the slave trade and later sought to end slavery. Her study identifies two elements of the effort to create a commercial system free from the taint of slavery: free produce, which placed culpability for slavery on the consumer; and legitimate commerce, which sought to induce producers, particularly in West Africa, to abandon the slave trade for alternative sources of income. The commercial abolitionists who led the drive for a more ethical commerce sought to reform capitalism, to end what they considered its greatest moral stain, but in the process their efforts revealed the contradictions that lay at the heart of "ethical capitalism." They embraced tactics that undermined slavery and simultaneously maintained profitability, but these tactics also created new ethical conundrums that opened the campaign to charges of self-interest and hypocrisy. Commercial abolitionists successfully highlighted the moral responsibility of British and American consumers and West African producers for sustaining slavery, but their vision of a reformed capitalism also helped create a global division of labor in which Africa and Asia became economic monocultures exploited by Western manufacturing nations. Everill's most significant insight lies in her analysis of the integral role West Africa played in the campaigns to combat slavery and the slave trade. Envisioning a truly Atlantic world, or at least North Atlantic world, she argues that in response to slavery and the consumer revolution it made possible, West Africans organized consumer boycotts, supported political change, and participated in religious revivals unique to their localities, but [End Page 100] also paralleling those taking place in Europe and the Americas. Across seven chapters, Everill explores the various elements of commercial abolitionists' efforts to end African and European participation in slavery: the consumer revolution of the eighteenth century and consumers' growing sense of responsibility for slavery's centrality in the production of staples like sugar and cotton; the creation of ethical brands recognized as produced by free labor; the crucial function of credit, particularly in West Africa, in promoting legitimate commerce; the role of government contracts and tariffs in promoting abolitionists' goals; and how nationalist concerns shaped reformers' tactics. Commercial abolitionists insisted that ending slave-produced consumption and replacing it with free produce would benefit everyone. Africans would have profitable alternatives to slave trading; consumers would enjoy lower prices because of the presumed efficiency of wage labor; and British and American merchants and manufacturers would profit from ethical trade with Africa. But such arguments ignored the "negative externalities" of capitalism: that the market system always produces winners and losers. The strategies commercial abolitionists employed to promote legitimate commerce and ensure profitability—creating debt-fueled monopsonies in West Africa; countenancing "domestic slavery" and indentured labor in Africa and Asia to lower prices for British and American consumers; seeking government contracts and tariff protection while embracing free trade principles; and, by the 1860s, endorsing an imperial world in which the African and Asian periphery produced agricultural goods for the European and American manufacturing core—revealed the dilemmas created by the drive for ethical commerce. As Everill notes, "resolving the contradictions of ethical capitalism was, and is, nearly impossible" (p. 241). The exhaustively researched Not Made by Slaves is part of a growing effort by historians to explore the rise of consumer activism, but Everill's challenging study ultimately reveals that "ethical capitalism" was (and remains) at heart an oxymoron. [End Page 101] A. Glenn Crothers University of Louisville Copyright © 2023 Trustees of Indiana University
《非奴隶制造:废奴时代的伦理资本主义》作者:布朗文·埃弗里尔(书评)
书评:《非奴隶制造:废奴时代的伦理资本主义》作者:布朗文·埃弗里尔A.格伦·克罗瑟斯《非奴隶制造:废奴时代的伦理资本主义》作者:布朗文·埃弗里尔(剑桥,马萨诸塞州):哈佛大学出版社,2020。328页。指出,指数。39.95美元)。今天,消费者抵制已成为进步和保守政治运动的共同特征。Bronwen Everill的《Not Made by Slaves》将这些运动的起源追溯到18世纪晚期的废奴运动,该运动首先攻击奴隶贸易,后来寻求结束奴隶制。她的研究确定了创建一个没有奴隶制污点的商业体系的努力的两个要素:免费产品,它把奴隶制的罪责推到了消费者身上;合法商业,试图诱使生产者,特别是西非的生产者,放弃奴隶贸易,寻找其他收入来源。商业废奴主义者领导了一场更加道德的商业运动,他们试图改革资本主义,结束他们认为最大的道德污点,但在这个过程中,他们的努力暴露了“道德资本主义”核心的矛盾。他们采用的策略既破坏了奴隶制,同时又保持了盈利能力,但这些策略也带来了新的道德难题,使这场运动受到了自利和虚伪的指责。商业废奴主义者成功地强调了英美消费者和西非生产者维持奴隶制的道德责任,但他们改革资本主义的愿景也帮助创造了全球劳动分工,使非洲和亚洲成为西方制造业国家剥削的单一经济文化。埃弗里尔最重要的洞察力在于她对西非在反对奴隶制和奴隶贸易的运动中所起的不可或缺的作用的分析。展望一个真正的大西洋世界,或者至少是北大西洋世界,她认为,为了应对奴隶制和消费者革命,西非人组织了消费者抵制,支持政治变革,并参与了当地独特的宗教复兴,但也与欧洲和美洲发生的事情相似。在七个章节中,埃弗里尔探讨了商业废奴主义者努力结束非洲和欧洲参与奴隶制的各种因素:18世纪的消费者革命和消费者对奴隶制在糖和棉花等主食生产中的中心地位日益增长的责任感;创造公认的自由劳动生产的道德品牌;信贷在促进合法商业方面的关键作用,特别是在西非;政府合同和关税在促进废奴主义者目标中的作用;以及民族主义的担忧如何影响了改革者的策略。商业废奴主义者坚持认为,结束奴隶生产的消费,代之以免费产品,将使每个人受益。非洲人将有比奴隶贸易更有利可图的选择;消费者将享受到更低的价格,因为人们认为雇佣劳动效率高;英美商人和制造商将从与非洲的道德贸易中获利。但这些论点忽视了资本主义的“负外部性”:市场体系总是会产生赢家和输家。商业废奴主义者在西非为促进合法商业和确保创造利润的债务驱动的垄断所采用的策略;支持非洲和亚洲的“家庭奴隶制”和契约劳工,以降低英国和美国消费者的价格;在奉行自由贸易原则的同时寻求政府合同和关税保护;到19世纪60年代,支持一个由非洲和亚洲周边地区为欧洲和美国制造业核心生产农产品的帝国世界,揭示了推动道德商业所造成的困境。正如埃弗里尔所指出的,“解决伦理资本主义的矛盾过去是,现在也是几乎不可能的”(第241页)。对《非奴隶制造》的详尽研究是历史学家探索消费者行动主义兴起的努力的一部分,但埃弗里尔具有挑战性的研究最终揭示了“道德资本主义”在本质上是一个矛盾修辞法(现在仍然是)。[End Page 101] A. Glenn Crothers University of Louisville版权所有©2023印第安纳大学董事会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信