The Russian Origin of hybrid warfare as a tool to promote the Anti-Russian Agenda in Western Society

Anton Vladimirovich Ilyichev
{"title":"The Russian Origin of hybrid warfare as a tool to promote the Anti-Russian Agenda in Western Society","authors":"Anton Vladimirovich Ilyichev","doi":"10.7256/2454-0617.2023.3.40121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author examines the publications of Western authors on the subject of hybrid warfare from 2014 to 2022, inclusive. The purpose of the study is to analyze the views of Western political and military experts that hybrid warfare is a development of Russian military thought, as one of the mechanisms to promote the anti-Russian agenda. The subject of the study is the publications of Western researchers on the topics of information and hybrid warfare from 2014 to 2022. The object of the study is a Russophobic narrative created around the phenomenon of hybrid warfare by Western political and military experts. The Russophobic narrative means a constructed sequence of images and ideas of an anti-Russian orientation, clothed in the form of a scientific narrative. Due to the huge array of publications for the period from 2014 to 2022, the work analyzed studies reflecting the main specifics of the views of Western authors on the subject under consideration. According to the results of the study, it was revealed that Western researchers began to attribute hybrid warfare to the development of Russian military theorists in 2014, which falls on a new round of active confrontation between Russia and the United States and the beginning of an active anti-Russian campaign in the West. Hybrid warfare has become a journalistic cliche today, which experts and journalists use to describe any actions that do not fit within the framework of traditional ideas about the principles of conventional warfare. Based on initially false and unsubstantiated theses, Western authors accuse Russia of waging a \"barbaric war\" on the territory of Ukraine in the period from 2014 to 2022. This study revealed that all the tools and elements of hybrid warfare described by Western experts have been successfully used by the United States and the NATO bloc in the course of modern military conflicts. Thus, the humanitarian sphere in the West has turned into another element of propaganda.","PeriodicalId":480816,"journal":{"name":"Konfliktologiâ","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Konfliktologiâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0617.2023.3.40121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author examines the publications of Western authors on the subject of hybrid warfare from 2014 to 2022, inclusive. The purpose of the study is to analyze the views of Western political and military experts that hybrid warfare is a development of Russian military thought, as one of the mechanisms to promote the anti-Russian agenda. The subject of the study is the publications of Western researchers on the topics of information and hybrid warfare from 2014 to 2022. The object of the study is a Russophobic narrative created around the phenomenon of hybrid warfare by Western political and military experts. The Russophobic narrative means a constructed sequence of images and ideas of an anti-Russian orientation, clothed in the form of a scientific narrative. Due to the huge array of publications for the period from 2014 to 2022, the work analyzed studies reflecting the main specifics of the views of Western authors on the subject under consideration. According to the results of the study, it was revealed that Western researchers began to attribute hybrid warfare to the development of Russian military theorists in 2014, which falls on a new round of active confrontation between Russia and the United States and the beginning of an active anti-Russian campaign in the West. Hybrid warfare has become a journalistic cliche today, which experts and journalists use to describe any actions that do not fit within the framework of traditional ideas about the principles of conventional warfare. Based on initially false and unsubstantiated theses, Western authors accuse Russia of waging a "barbaric war" on the territory of Ukraine in the period from 2014 to 2022. This study revealed that all the tools and elements of hybrid warfare described by Western experts have been successfully used by the United States and the NATO bloc in the course of modern military conflicts. Thus, the humanitarian sphere in the West has turned into another element of propaganda.
西方社会推动反俄议程的工具——混合战争的俄罗斯起源
作者研究了2014年至2022年(含2022年)西方作者关于混合战争主题的出版物。本研究的目的是分析西方政治和军事专家的观点,即混合战争是俄罗斯军事思想的发展,是推动反俄议程的机制之一。该研究的主题是2014年至2022年西方研究人员关于信息和混合战主题的出版物。这项研究的对象是西方政治和军事专家围绕混合战争现象创造的一种恐俄叙事。“恐俄叙事”指的是一系列以科学叙事为外衣的反俄形象和思想的建构。由于2014年至2022年期间的大量出版物,该工作分析的研究反映了西方作者对所考虑主题的主要观点。研究结果显示,西方研究人员在2014年开始将混合战归因于俄罗斯军事理论家的发展,这是新一轮俄美积极对抗和西方积极反俄运动的开始。混合战争已经成为当今新闻界的陈词滥调,专家和记者用它来描述任何不符合关于常规战争原则的传统观念框架的行动。基于最初错误和未经证实的论点,西方作者指责俄罗斯在2014年至2022年期间在乌克兰境内发动了一场“野蛮战争”。这项研究表明,西方专家所描述的混合战争的所有工具和要素都已被美国和北约集团在现代军事冲突中成功地使用。因此,西方的人道主义领域已经变成了另一个宣传元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书