Did television kill cinema? Contemporary writings on film and early television in Finland

IF 0.1 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Kimmo Laine
{"title":"Did television kill cinema? Contemporary writings on film and early television in Finland","authors":"Kimmo Laine","doi":"10.1386/jsca_00083_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to survey and re-examine writings on the emergence of television in Finnish film journals and newspapers in the 1950s and early 1960s. While film history has typically pictured film and television mainly as rivals, here the relation is discussed in terms not only of competition but also of interaction and cooperation. I classify the early writings into three groups according to the mode with which the relations between television and cinema are discussed: separationist, protectionist and cooperative. Based on this classification, I argue that it was only after 1963 that the narrative about television taking over – or, indeed, killing – cinema was retroactively established.","PeriodicalId":42248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scandinavian Cinema","volume":"610 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scandinavian Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jsca_00083_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this article is to survey and re-examine writings on the emergence of television in Finnish film journals and newspapers in the 1950s and early 1960s. While film history has typically pictured film and television mainly as rivals, here the relation is discussed in terms not only of competition but also of interaction and cooperation. I classify the early writings into three groups according to the mode with which the relations between television and cinema are discussed: separationist, protectionist and cooperative. Based on this classification, I argue that it was only after 1963 that the narrative about television taking over – or, indeed, killing – cinema was retroactively established.
电视扼杀了电影吗?芬兰关于电影和早期电视的当代著作
本文的目的是调查和重新审视20世纪50年代和60年代初芬兰电影期刊和报纸上关于电视出现的文章。虽然电影史通常将电影和电视主要描绘为对手,但这里讨论的关系不仅是竞争,而且是互动和合作。根据讨论电视与电影关系的模式,笔者将早期的作品分为三类:分离主义、保护主义和合作主义。基于这种分类,我认为,只有在1963年之后,关于电视取代——或者,实际上是杀死——电影的叙述才被追溯建立起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Scandinavian Cinema
Journal of Scandinavian Cinema FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Journal of Scandinavian Cinema is a scholarly journal devoted to excellent research and stimulating discussion focusing on the cinemas of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, both within their national and Nordic contexts, and as transnational cinemas in a globalized world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信