The Influence of Passage Cohesion on Cloze Test Item Difficulty

Jonathan Trace
{"title":"The Influence of Passage Cohesion on Cloze Test Item Difficulty","authors":"Jonathan Trace","doi":"10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of context in cloze tests has long been seen as both a benefit as well as a complication in their usefulness as a measure of second language comprehension (Brown, 2013). Passage cohesion, in particular, would seem to have a relevant and important effect on the degree to which cloze items function and the interpretability of performances (Brown, 1983; Dastjerdi & Talebinezhad, 2006; Oller & Jonz, 1994). With recent evidence showing that cloze items can require examinees to access information at both the sentence and passage level (Trace, 2020), it’s worthwhile to now look back and examine the relationship between aspects of passage cohesion—referential cohesion, semantic overlap, and incidence of conjunctives—and item difficulty by classification. The current study draws upon a large pool of cloze test passages and items (k = 377) originally used by Brown (1993) along with automated text analysis of cohesion (Coh-Metrix, McNamara et al., 2014) to examine the impact of passage cohesion on item function. Correlations, factor analysis, and linear regression point to clear though minimal differences for both sentential and intersentential items as they relate to aspects of passage cohesion, the results of which may inform future test design and interpretation of cloze performance.","PeriodicalId":350461,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research Quarterly","volume":"41 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of context in cloze tests has long been seen as both a benefit as well as a complication in their usefulness as a measure of second language comprehension (Brown, 2013). Passage cohesion, in particular, would seem to have a relevant and important effect on the degree to which cloze items function and the interpretability of performances (Brown, 1983; Dastjerdi & Talebinezhad, 2006; Oller & Jonz, 1994). With recent evidence showing that cloze items can require examinees to access information at both the sentence and passage level (Trace, 2020), it’s worthwhile to now look back and examine the relationship between aspects of passage cohesion—referential cohesion, semantic overlap, and incidence of conjunctives—and item difficulty by classification. The current study draws upon a large pool of cloze test passages and items (k = 377) originally used by Brown (1993) along with automated text analysis of cohesion (Coh-Metrix, McNamara et al., 2014) to examine the impact of passage cohesion on item function. Correlations, factor analysis, and linear regression point to clear though minimal differences for both sentential and intersentential items as they relate to aspects of passage cohesion, the results of which may inform future test design and interpretation of cloze performance.
文章衔接对完形填空难度的影响
长期以来,语境在完形填空测试中的作用既被认为是一种好处,也被认为是一种复杂性,因为它可以衡量第二语言的理解能力(Brown, 2013)。尤其是段落衔接,似乎对完形填空项目的功能和表演的可解释性有重要的影响(Brown, 1983;Dastjerdi,Talebinezhad, 2006;轮胎式压路机,Jonz, 1994)。最近有证据表明,完形填词项目可能要求考生在句子和段落两个层面获取信息(Trace, 2020),现在有必要回顾一下,并通过分类来检查段落衔接方面(指称衔接、语义重叠和连接词的出现)与项目难度之间的关系。目前的研究利用Brown(1993)最初使用的大量完形测试段落和项目(k = 377)以及自动文本衔接分析(oh- metrix, McNamara et al., 2014)来检查段落衔接对项目功能的影响。相关性、因子分析和线性回归表明,句子和句子间项目在段落衔接方面的差异很小,其结果可能为未来的测试设计和完形填空表现的解释提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信