Determining Contribution of Savings and Credit Groups on the Social Welfare Projects in Rural Rwanda. A Case of Umuzabibumwiza Organization, Musanze District

{"title":"Determining Contribution of Savings and Credit Groups on the Social Welfare Projects in Rural Rwanda. A Case of Umuzabibumwiza Organization, Musanze District","authors":"","doi":"10.53819/81018102t2212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The inadequate access to finance in Rwanda for the rural poor is one of the crucial problems faced despite the government’s efforts by prioritizing microfinance as a solution to financial access. Savings and credit groups have been introduced more than 10 years ago in Rwanda to promote access to finance and help poor people to meet their needs and improve household income.  Therefore, this study is mainly assessing the contribution of savings and credit groups (SCGs) on social welfare projects at Musanze Sector. Specific objectives are to find out the contribution of Savings in SCGs on social welfare projects at Musanze Sector; to assess the contribution of Credit facilitation in SCGs on social welfare projects at Musanze Sector, Musanze District, Rwanda; to analyze the contribution of emergency fund in SCGs on social welfare projects at Musanze Sector; and to evaluate the contribution of trainings in SCGs on social welfare projects at Musanze Sector. The research will combine exploratory, descriptive, explanatory and evaluative research design. The primary and secondary data are all sources of data; the study population is 360 members of Umuzabibumwiza organization from Musanze in Musanze Sector while sample size is 190 respondents selected using purposive sampling and simple random sampling techniques.  The data collection instruments are documentation, questionnaire, personal observation, focus group discussion, and interview. The researcher computed data using SPSS IBM version 23.0 to deal with statistical data.  The coefficient for Savings in SCGs (1.389) indicates that a unit increase in savings within SCGs corresponds to a statistically significant positive increase in Social welfare projects (p = 0.035). This implies that higher savings levels within these groups are associated with improved outcomes in social welfare initiatives, underlining the pivotal role that savings play in driving positive change. Emergency fund, with a coefficient of 1.839 (p = 0.021), highlights its substantial positive influence on Social welfare projects. This finding indicates that maintaining higher emergency funds within these groups is linked to enhanced social welfare project outcomes, reflecting the vital role of financial preparedness in addressing unforeseen challenges. While Credit facilitation in SCGs possesses a coefficient of 0.401 (p = 0.010), implying a weaker relationship with Social welfare projects, its contribution remains noteworthy. This indicates that while credit facilitation is a factor, its impact might be less pronounced compared to other predictors. Trainings in SCGs, with a coefficient of 1.224 (p = 0.015), also demonstrates a significant positive association with Social welfare projects. This signifies that conducting effective training programs within SCGs contributes positively to the success of social welfare projects, emphasizing the importance of skill development and knowledge enhancement. Umuzabibumwiza should strengthen the credit facilitation processes within SCGs. This can be achieved by establishing clear guidelines for loan disbursement and repayment, ensuring transparent record-keeping, and offering capacity-building programs to enhance members' business skills. Keywords: Savings, Credit Groups, Performance, Social Welfare, Projects","PeriodicalId":480774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of entrepreneurship & project management","volume":"62 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of entrepreneurship & project management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The inadequate access to finance in Rwanda for the rural poor is one of the crucial problems faced despite the government’s efforts by prioritizing microfinance as a solution to financial access. Savings and credit groups have been introduced more than 10 years ago in Rwanda to promote access to finance and help poor people to meet their needs and improve household income.  Therefore, this study is mainly assessing the contribution of savings and credit groups (SCGs) on social welfare projects at Musanze Sector. Specific objectives are to find out the contribution of Savings in SCGs on social welfare projects at Musanze Sector; to assess the contribution of Credit facilitation in SCGs on social welfare projects at Musanze Sector, Musanze District, Rwanda; to analyze the contribution of emergency fund in SCGs on social welfare projects at Musanze Sector; and to evaluate the contribution of trainings in SCGs on social welfare projects at Musanze Sector. The research will combine exploratory, descriptive, explanatory and evaluative research design. The primary and secondary data are all sources of data; the study population is 360 members of Umuzabibumwiza organization from Musanze in Musanze Sector while sample size is 190 respondents selected using purposive sampling and simple random sampling techniques.  The data collection instruments are documentation, questionnaire, personal observation, focus group discussion, and interview. The researcher computed data using SPSS IBM version 23.0 to deal with statistical data.  The coefficient for Savings in SCGs (1.389) indicates that a unit increase in savings within SCGs corresponds to a statistically significant positive increase in Social welfare projects (p = 0.035). This implies that higher savings levels within these groups are associated with improved outcomes in social welfare initiatives, underlining the pivotal role that savings play in driving positive change. Emergency fund, with a coefficient of 1.839 (p = 0.021), highlights its substantial positive influence on Social welfare projects. This finding indicates that maintaining higher emergency funds within these groups is linked to enhanced social welfare project outcomes, reflecting the vital role of financial preparedness in addressing unforeseen challenges. While Credit facilitation in SCGs possesses a coefficient of 0.401 (p = 0.010), implying a weaker relationship with Social welfare projects, its contribution remains noteworthy. This indicates that while credit facilitation is a factor, its impact might be less pronounced compared to other predictors. Trainings in SCGs, with a coefficient of 1.224 (p = 0.015), also demonstrates a significant positive association with Social welfare projects. This signifies that conducting effective training programs within SCGs contributes positively to the success of social welfare projects, emphasizing the importance of skill development and knowledge enhancement. Umuzabibumwiza should strengthen the credit facilitation processes within SCGs. This can be achieved by establishing clear guidelines for loan disbursement and repayment, ensuring transparent record-keeping, and offering capacity-building programs to enhance members' business skills. Keywords: Savings, Credit Groups, Performance, Social Welfare, Projects
确定储蓄和信贷团体对卢旺达农村社会福利项目的贡献。木桑则地区Umuzabibumwiza组织一例
尽管政府努力将小额信贷作为融资渠道的解决方案,但卢旺达农村贫困人口的融资渠道不足仍是该国面临的关键问题之一。10多年前,卢旺达引入了储蓄和信贷小组,以促进融资渠道,帮助穷人满足需求,提高家庭收入。因此,本研究主要评估储蓄和信贷集团(scg)对木桑则地区社会福利项目的贡献。具体目标是查明社会福利储蓄对木山泽地区社会福利项目的贡献;评估在卢旺达穆桑泽区穆桑泽区社会福利项目中,scg信贷便利化的贡献;分析地方政府应急资金对木桑则地区社会福利项目的贡献;评估scg培训对木山泽区社会福利项目的贡献。本研究将结合探索性、描述性、解释性和评价性的研究设计。一手数据和二级数据都是数据的来源;研究人群为来自木桑则地区木桑则Umuzabibumwiza组织的360名成员,样本量为190名受访者,采用有目的抽样和简单随机抽样技术。数据收集手段有文献资料、问卷调查、个人观察、焦点小组讨论和访谈。研究者使用SPSS IBM 23.0版本计算数据,对统计数据进行处理。scg储蓄系数(1.389)表明,scg内单位储蓄的增加对应于社会福利项目的统计显著正增加(p = 0.035)。这意味着,这些群体中较高的储蓄水平与社会福利举措的改善结果有关,强调了储蓄在推动积极变革方面发挥的关键作用。应急基金的系数为1.839 (p = 0.021),表明应急基金对社会福利项目有显著的正向影响。这一发现表明,在这些群体中保持较高的应急资金与提高社会福利项目成果有关,反映了财政准备在应对不可预见的挑战方面的关键作用。虽然scg的信贷便利化系数为0.401 (p = 0.010),表明其与社会福利项目的关系较弱,但其贡献仍然值得注意。这表明,虽然信贷便利化是一个因素,但与其他预测因素相比,其影响可能不那么明显。scg的培训与社会福利项目也有显著的正相关,其系数为1.224 (p = 0.015)。这表明在社会福利小组内开展有效的培训计划对社会福利项目的成功有积极的作用,强调了技能发展和知识增长的重要性。umuzabihumwiza应加强可持续发展集团内部的信贷便利化进程。要实现这一目标,可以制定明确的贷款发放和偿还指导方针,确保记录保持透明,并提供能力建设项目以提高成员的业务技能。关键词:储蓄,信贷集团,绩效,社会福利,项目
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信