Short-Term Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Classical Low-Flow Low-Gradient Versus Normal-Flow Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis

Benjamin Fogelson, Raj Baljepally, Hassan Tahir, James Livesay, Tyler Coombes, Chirag Patel, Ghassan Wadi, Raymond Dieter III
{"title":"Short-Term Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Classical Low-Flow Low-Gradient Versus Normal-Flow Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis","authors":"Benjamin Fogelson, Raj Baljepally, Hassan Tahir, James Livesay, Tyler Coombes, Chirag Patel, Ghassan Wadi, Raymond Dieter III","doi":"10.33696/cardiology.4.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Both classical severe low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG-AS) and severe normal-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (NFLG-AS) patients undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, few studies have compared outcomes between the two groups. Our study aimed to assess short term post-TAVI outcomes between classical LFLG-AS and NFLG-AS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center, analysis of 206 patients who underwent TAVI between January 2011 to September 2020. Of these, 44 (males: 33) had classical LFLG-AS and 162 (males: 89) had NFLG-AS. Six-month primary outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Multiple secondary outcomes were assessed including stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), new-onset atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury (AKI), major bleeding, vascular complications, and repeat hospitalizations from cardiac causes. Results: The cumulative six-month all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were similar between classical severe LFLG-AS and NFLG-AS patients (6.81 % vs. 4.32 %, P = 0.49 and 2.27 % vs. 2.47 %, P = 0.93 respectively). All secondary outcomes were also similar, except for a statistically significant higher rate of AKI in patients with classical LFLG-AS (P = < 0.0001). Conclusion: Except for a higher incidence of AKI in patients with severe classical LFLG-AS, six-month post-TAVI outcomes did not differ between classical LFLG-AS and NFLG-AS.","PeriodicalId":15510,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Cardiology","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/cardiology.4.044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Both classical severe low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG-AS) and severe normal-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (NFLG-AS) patients undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, few studies have compared outcomes between the two groups. Our study aimed to assess short term post-TAVI outcomes between classical LFLG-AS and NFLG-AS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center, analysis of 206 patients who underwent TAVI between January 2011 to September 2020. Of these, 44 (males: 33) had classical LFLG-AS and 162 (males: 89) had NFLG-AS. Six-month primary outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Multiple secondary outcomes were assessed including stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), new-onset atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury (AKI), major bleeding, vascular complications, and repeat hospitalizations from cardiac causes. Results: The cumulative six-month all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were similar between classical severe LFLG-AS and NFLG-AS patients (6.81 % vs. 4.32 %, P = 0.49 and 2.27 % vs. 2.47 %, P = 0.93 respectively). All secondary outcomes were also similar, except for a statistically significant higher rate of AKI in patients with classical LFLG-AS (P = < 0.0001). Conclusion: Except for a higher incidence of AKI in patients with severe classical LFLG-AS, six-month post-TAVI outcomes did not differ between classical LFLG-AS and NFLG-AS.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的短期结果:典型低流量低梯度vs正常流量低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄
背景:典型的严重低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄(LFLG-AS)和严重正常流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄(NFLG-AS)患者均行经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)。然而,很少有研究比较两组之间的结果。我们的研究旨在评估经典LFLG-AS和NFLG-AS在tavi后的短期预后。方法:我们对2011年1月至2020年9月期间接受TAVI治疗的206例患者进行了回顾性、单中心分析。其中44例(男性33例)为典型LFLG-AS, 162例(男性89例)为非典型LFLG-AS。6个月主要结局包括全因死亡率和心血管死亡率。评估了多个次要结局,包括卒中、心肌梗死(MI)、新发心房颤动、急性肾损伤(AKI)、大出血、血管并发症和心脏原因的重复住院。结果:典型重症LFLG-AS和NFLG-AS患者6个月累积全因死亡率和心血管死亡率相似(分别为6.81%对4.32%,P = 0.49和2.27%对2.47%,P = 0.93)。除经典LFLG-AS患者AKI发生率较高外,所有次要结局也相似(P = <0.0001)。结论:除了严重经典LFLG-AS患者AKI发生率较高外,经典LFLG-AS和NFLG-AS在tavi后6个月的预后没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信