Perception, Challenges, and Barriers of Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound Among Respiratory Therapist in the United States

Kristin Ireland MSRC, RRT , Noha Daher DrPh , Michael Terry BS, RRT, RPFT , David López EdD, RRT , Paul Casillas MSRC, RRT-ACCS , Laren D. Tan MD, MPH, FCCP , Abdullah Alismail PhD, RRT, FCCP, FAARC
{"title":"Perception, Challenges, and Barriers of Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound Among Respiratory Therapist in the United States","authors":"Kristin Ireland MSRC, RRT ,&nbsp;Noha Daher DrPh ,&nbsp;Michael Terry BS, RRT, RPFT ,&nbsp;David López EdD, RRT ,&nbsp;Paul Casillas MSRC, RRT-ACCS ,&nbsp;Laren D. Tan MD, MPH, FCCP ,&nbsp;Abdullah Alismail PhD, RRT, FCCP, FAARC","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2023.100029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Point-of-care lung ultrasound (POCLUS) has gained significant interest within the respiratory therapy profession.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>Does participating in an online on-demand POCLUS didactic course affect the willingness to use or promote POCLUS among respiratory therapists (RTs)? What are the critical barriers to the implementation of POCLUS? What are the perceptions of RTs about the use of POCLUS?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>This study used a pre-educational vs posteducational interventional design and received approval from the institutional review board. Participants were recruited via social media channels. The inclusion criteria required participants to be licensed registered RTs actively engaged in bedside practice within the United States. After signing the informed consent form, participants completed an online survey, underwent the online course, and participated in a 2-week follow-up survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 70 participants with a mean ± SD age of 38.8 ± 9.0 years participated in the study. Most participants were female (n = 50 [71.4%]) and had been practicing as RTs for &gt; 1 year (n = 65 [92.9%]). Most participants (87.1% [n = 61]) had observed POCLUS being performed on a patient and were curious to use it after the course; 97.1% (n = 68) believed that POCLUS should be incorporated into the clinical assessment. Additionally, 91.4% (n = 64) of the participants discussed the POCLUS elements with fellow RTs and 90% (n = 63) reported an increased willingness to use this skill. The top barriers to performing POCLUS were the lack of a formal curriculum and limited device availability. Interestingly, financial incentives did not emerge as a significant barrier.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Our findings show that RTs display strong willingness and interest in integrating POCLUS into their daily clinical assessments. The inclusion of POCLUS in the curriculum was found to be the primary barrier, whereas financial incentives were not reported as a significant barrier.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789223000296/pdfft?md5=4a08a14e788b457ee9790d9ba2ee6778&pid=1-s2.0-S2949789223000296-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789223000296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Point-of-care lung ultrasound (POCLUS) has gained significant interest within the respiratory therapy profession.

Research Question

Does participating in an online on-demand POCLUS didactic course affect the willingness to use or promote POCLUS among respiratory therapists (RTs)? What are the critical barriers to the implementation of POCLUS? What are the perceptions of RTs about the use of POCLUS?

Study Design and Methods

This study used a pre-educational vs posteducational interventional design and received approval from the institutional review board. Participants were recruited via social media channels. The inclusion criteria required participants to be licensed registered RTs actively engaged in bedside practice within the United States. After signing the informed consent form, participants completed an online survey, underwent the online course, and participated in a 2-week follow-up survey.

Results

A total of 70 participants with a mean ± SD age of 38.8 ± 9.0 years participated in the study. Most participants were female (n = 50 [71.4%]) and had been practicing as RTs for > 1 year (n = 65 [92.9%]). Most participants (87.1% [n = 61]) had observed POCLUS being performed on a patient and were curious to use it after the course; 97.1% (n = 68) believed that POCLUS should be incorporated into the clinical assessment. Additionally, 91.4% (n = 64) of the participants discussed the POCLUS elements with fellow RTs and 90% (n = 63) reported an increased willingness to use this skill. The top barriers to performing POCLUS were the lack of a formal curriculum and limited device availability. Interestingly, financial incentives did not emerge as a significant barrier.

Interpretation

Our findings show that RTs display strong willingness and interest in integrating POCLUS into their daily clinical assessments. The inclusion of POCLUS in the curriculum was found to be the primary barrier, whereas financial incentives were not reported as a significant barrier.

美国呼吸治疗师对护理点肺部超声波检查的认识、挑战和障碍
研究问题参加在线点播 POCLUS 教学课程是否会影响呼吸治疗师(RTs)使用或推广 POCLUS 的意愿?实施 POCLUS 的关键障碍是什么?呼吸治疗师对使用 POCLUS 的看法如何?研究设计与方法本研究采用教育前与教育后干预设计,并获得了机构审查委员会的批准。参与者通过社交媒体渠道招募。纳入标准要求参与者是在美国积极从事床旁实践的注册执业 RT。在签署知情同意书后,参与者完成了在线调查,接受了在线课程,并参加了为期两周的跟踪调查。结果共有 70 名参与者参加了研究,平均年龄(± SD)为 38.8 ± 9.0 岁。大多数参与者为女性(n = 50 [71.4%]),从事 RT 工作已有 > 1 年(n = 65 [92.9%])。大多数学员(87.1% [n = 61])曾在患者身上观察过 POCLUS 的操作,并在课程结束后对其使用产生了好奇;97.1%(n = 68)的学员认为 POCLUS 应纳入临床评估。此外,91.4%(n = 64)的学员与其他 RT 讨论了 POCLUS 要素,90%(n = 63)的学员表示更愿意使用这项技能。执行 POCLUS 的最大障碍是缺乏正规课程和设备供应有限。我们的研究结果表明,RTs 对将 POCLUS 纳入其日常临床评估表现出强烈的意愿和兴趣。我们发现,将 POCLUS 纳入课程是主要障碍,而经济激励并不是主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信