Restorative Justice Pathways in Palestine/Israel: Undoing the Settler Colonial Captivity of Jewishness

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Atalia Omer
{"title":"Restorative Justice Pathways in Palestine/Israel: Undoing the Settler Colonial Captivity of Jewishness","authors":"Atalia Omer","doi":"10.1353/sho.2023.a911223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Jewish critique of Zionism is not an abstract exercise, but one that is also, and necessarily, about Palestinians and sociopolitical realities in Palestine/Israel, where Zionist sovereignty defines the space in its entirety. This article traces sites of Jewish Israeli decolonial restorative justice potential and argues that some interventions that appear restorative, in effect, obscure and normalize historical injustices. Accordingly, a spectrum of Jewish critics posit Zionism as a form of Jewish \"moral exile\" or \"moral transgression,\" and they seek Jewish authenticity to return \"home\" ethically. I argue that, to the degree that restorative justice practices are missing from ethical Jewish reflections on Zionism and Israelism, the sources of such Jewish critiques of Zionism remain diasporic. Focusing on the potentials of Jewish Israeli restorative justice, including those articulated by the feminist organization Zochrot and the petition of Jewish Israelis against Israeli apartheid propelled by the escalation of violence in May 2021, offers a pathway for unsettling and troubling the diasporic as the primary Jewish source of an ethical critique of Israelism as the idolatry of the Jewish State and as Zionism's imbrication in a settler colonial paradigm.","PeriodicalId":21809,"journal":{"name":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sho.2023.a911223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Jewish critique of Zionism is not an abstract exercise, but one that is also, and necessarily, about Palestinians and sociopolitical realities in Palestine/Israel, where Zionist sovereignty defines the space in its entirety. This article traces sites of Jewish Israeli decolonial restorative justice potential and argues that some interventions that appear restorative, in effect, obscure and normalize historical injustices. Accordingly, a spectrum of Jewish critics posit Zionism as a form of Jewish "moral exile" or "moral transgression," and they seek Jewish authenticity to return "home" ethically. I argue that, to the degree that restorative justice practices are missing from ethical Jewish reflections on Zionism and Israelism, the sources of such Jewish critiques of Zionism remain diasporic. Focusing on the potentials of Jewish Israeli restorative justice, including those articulated by the feminist organization Zochrot and the petition of Jewish Israelis against Israeli apartheid propelled by the escalation of violence in May 2021, offers a pathway for unsettling and troubling the diasporic as the primary Jewish source of an ethical critique of Israelism as the idolatry of the Jewish State and as Zionism's imbrication in a settler colonial paradigm.
巴勒斯坦/以色列的恢复性司法之路:解除定居者对犹太人的殖民囚禁
摘要:犹太人对犹太复国主义的批判并不是一种抽象的实践,它也必然是关于巴勒斯坦人和巴勒斯坦/以色列的社会政治现实的,犹太复国主义的主权在其中定义了整个空间。本文追溯了犹太以色列去殖民恢复性司法潜力的遗址,并认为一些看似恢复性的干预措施实际上掩盖了历史上的不公正并使其正常化。因此,一些犹太批评家将犹太复国主义视为一种犹太人的“道德流亡”或“道德越轨”,他们寻求犹太人的真实性,以在道德上回归“家园”。我认为,在犹太人对犹太复国主义和以色列主义的伦理反思中缺失了恢复性司法实践的程度上,犹太人对犹太复国主义的这种批评的来源仍然是散居的。关注犹太以色列恢复正义的潜力,包括女权主义组织Zochrot和犹太以色列人反对以色列种族隔离的请愿书,这些请愿书是由2021年5月暴力升级推动的,它为流亡者提供了一条令人不安和不安的途径,因为他们是对以色列主义的道德批判的主要犹太来源,认为以色列主义是对犹太国家的偶像崇拜,是犹太复国主义在定居者殖民范式中的砖瓦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信