Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for post-stroke adjustment difficulties via telerehabilitation in a working-age man

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jinnie Ooi, Tom Steverson
{"title":"Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for post-stroke adjustment difficulties via telerehabilitation in a working-age man","authors":"Jinnie Ooi, Tom Steverson","doi":"10.1017/s1754470x23000260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Adjustment difficulties following a stroke are common and associated with poorer outcomes. Current systematic reviews suggest insufficient evidence for the efficacy of psychological interventions for post-stroke anxiety and/or depression. However, a recent randomised controlled trial (Majumdar and Morris, 2019) of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) showed promise in reducing depression and increasing hopefulness and perceived health status in stroke survivors. The present case study describes the assessment, formulation, treatment and outcomes of post-stroke adjustment difficulties in a working-aged man using ACT delivered via telerehabilitation. At the end of treatment (six sessions over 2 months), the client no longer met clinical cut-off for psychological distress and depression. Furthermore, reported levels of psychological flexibility were comparable to non-clinical norms. These gains were maintained at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Outcomes from this case study support emerging evidence indicating that ACT may be an efficacious intervention for post-stroke adjustment difficulties, even when delivered via telerehabilitation. Further research investigating the mediating and moderating effects of different cognitive behavioural processes such as values and acceptance on psychological adjustment to stroke is recommended. Key learning aims (1) Current evidence on the efficacy of psychological interventions for stroke survivors is limited. (2) This case study describes the assessment, treatment and outcomes of post-stroke adjustment difficulties in a working-aged man using an ACT approach. (3) Following six sessions of ACT delivered via telerehabilitation, the client no longer met clinical cut-off for psychological distress and depression. Moreover, his levels of psychological flexibility were comparable to non-clinical norms. (4) Further exploration of psychological processes that facilitate post-stroke adjustment difficulties is recommended.","PeriodicalId":45163,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1754470x23000260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Adjustment difficulties following a stroke are common and associated with poorer outcomes. Current systematic reviews suggest insufficient evidence for the efficacy of psychological interventions for post-stroke anxiety and/or depression. However, a recent randomised controlled trial (Majumdar and Morris, 2019) of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) showed promise in reducing depression and increasing hopefulness and perceived health status in stroke survivors. The present case study describes the assessment, formulation, treatment and outcomes of post-stroke adjustment difficulties in a working-aged man using ACT delivered via telerehabilitation. At the end of treatment (six sessions over 2 months), the client no longer met clinical cut-off for psychological distress and depression. Furthermore, reported levels of psychological flexibility were comparable to non-clinical norms. These gains were maintained at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Outcomes from this case study support emerging evidence indicating that ACT may be an efficacious intervention for post-stroke adjustment difficulties, even when delivered via telerehabilitation. Further research investigating the mediating and moderating effects of different cognitive behavioural processes such as values and acceptance on psychological adjustment to stroke is recommended. Key learning aims (1) Current evidence on the efficacy of psychological interventions for stroke survivors is limited. (2) This case study describes the assessment, treatment and outcomes of post-stroke adjustment difficulties in a working-aged man using an ACT approach. (3) Following six sessions of ACT delivered via telerehabilitation, the client no longer met clinical cut-off for psychological distress and depression. Moreover, his levels of psychological flexibility were comparable to non-clinical norms. (4) Further exploration of psychological processes that facilitate post-stroke adjustment difficulties is recommended.
接受与承诺疗法(ACT)对工作年龄男性脑卒中后适应困难的远程康复治疗
中风后的调整困难是常见的,并且与较差的预后相关。目前的系统综述表明,心理干预对中风后焦虑和/或抑郁的疗效证据不足。然而,最近一项基于群体的接受和承诺疗法(ACT)的随机对照试验(Majumdar和Morris, 2019)显示出中风幸存者减少抑郁、增加希望和感知健康状况的希望。本案例研究描述了评估,制定,治疗和结果卒中后适应困难的工作年龄男性使用ACT提供远程康复。在治疗结束时(6次疗程超过2个月),来访者不再符合心理困扰和抑郁的临床界限。此外,报告的心理灵活性水平与非临床标准相当。这些进展在3个月和6个月的随访中保持不变。本案例研究的结果支持新出现的证据,表明ACT可能是卒中后适应困难的有效干预措施,即使通过远程康复提供。建议进一步研究不同认知行为过程如价值观和接受对中风心理适应的中介和调节作用。(1)目前关于心理干预对中风幸存者有效性的证据有限。(2)本案例研究描述了一名使用ACT方法的工作年龄男性卒中后适应困难的评估、治疗和结果。(3)通过远程康复进行六次ACT治疗后,来访者不再符合心理困扰和抑郁的临床标准。此外,他的心理灵活性水平与非临床标准相当。(4)建议进一步探索促进脑卒中后适应困难的心理过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapist
Cognitive Behaviour Therapist PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信