Comparative Analysis of Visitation Rights Legal Systems between China and the United States

Science of Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.23977/law.2023.020607

{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Visitation Rights Legal Systems between China and the United States","authors":"","doi":"10.23977/law.2023.020607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares the visitation rights legal systems in China and the United States, analyzing differences in legal frameworks, legal principles, visitation rights protection, and judicial practices. In terms of legal frameworks, Chinese law is more centralized and unified, while American law is more decentralized. Regarding legal principles, China emphasizes the best interests of the child, while the United States emphasizes the equal rights of parents. In terms of visitation rights protection, Chinese law focuses on the rights of custodial parents, while American law pays more attention to the rights of non-custodial parents. In terms of judicial practices, China emphasizes the best interests of the child and enforcement difficulties, while the United States encourages negotiation and ensures the execution of court orders. Finally, future development directions are discussed, including cross-border visitation rights protection, technological advancements, non-custodial parent rights protection, improvement of dispute resolution mechanisms, and enhancement of public awareness. This article aims to provide references and insights for improving and enhancing visitation rights legal systems.","PeriodicalId":271650,"journal":{"name":"Science of Law Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article compares the visitation rights legal systems in China and the United States, analyzing differences in legal frameworks, legal principles, visitation rights protection, and judicial practices. In terms of legal frameworks, Chinese law is more centralized and unified, while American law is more decentralized. Regarding legal principles, China emphasizes the best interests of the child, while the United States emphasizes the equal rights of parents. In terms of visitation rights protection, Chinese law focuses on the rights of custodial parents, while American law pays more attention to the rights of non-custodial parents. In terms of judicial practices, China emphasizes the best interests of the child and enforcement difficulties, while the United States encourages negotiation and ensures the execution of court orders. Finally, future development directions are discussed, including cross-border visitation rights protection, technological advancements, non-custodial parent rights protection, improvement of dispute resolution mechanisms, and enhancement of public awareness. This article aims to provide references and insights for improving and enhancing visitation rights legal systems.

查看原文本刊更多论文

中美探视权法律制度比较分析

本文比较了中美两国探视权法律制度，分析了探视权法律框架、法律原则、探视权保护和司法实践等方面的差异。在法律框架上，中国法律更加集中统一，而美国法律更加分散。在法律原则上，中国强调儿童的最大利益，而美国强调父母的平等权利。在探视权保护方面，中国法律侧重于监护权父母的权利，而美国法律更关注非监护权父母的权利。在司法实践方面，中国强调儿童的最大利益和执行困难，而美国则鼓励谈判，确保法院命令的执行。最后，对未来的发展方向进行了探讨，包括跨境探视权保护、技术进步、非监护父母权利保护、纠纷解决机制的完善以及公众意识的增强。本文旨在为完善和完善探视权法律制度提供参考和启示。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Science of Law Journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量