Cannabis Content in Athletic Training and Physical Therapy Curriculums in the United States

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Shannon David, Jeff Konin, Jim Farris
{"title":"Cannabis Content in Athletic Training and Physical Therapy Curriculums in the United States","authors":"Shannon David, Jeff Konin, Jim Farris","doi":"10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit drug in the U.S. and its use is becoming more popular with the legalization of medical marijuana. Currently, 36/50 states and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana for medical purposes. These changes have allowed for more cannabis-related research to be conducted. It is unknown how health professional education programs such as physical therapy and athletic training have integrated cannabis-related curriculum into their students’ training. This study aimed to identify how physical therapy and athletic training education programs are approaching teaching students about cannabis-related topics. Methods: There were 111 individuals from 40 states who responded to the survey (Males=53; Female=58), including 88 athletic training and 23 physical therapy faculty. Methods: An email was sent to all program directors of athletic training and physical therapy programs in the US with a Qualtrics survey link for faculty to complete. The 23-item questionnaire included closed-ended questions on demographics, where they sought cannabis-related information, and whether program curriculum includes cannabis-related topics. Frequencies were computed for sources of cannabis-related information and whether program curriculum includes cannabis-related topics. Results: Sixty (53.5%) participants stated they have not received information or completed any training related to cannabis. Of those receiving information or completing training (n=51), the most common sources of information were live lectures (n=23), peer-reviewed manuscripts (n=24), and social media/news (n=21). Also, 43 (38%) participants noted teaching cannabis-related topics in their curriculum. However, 33 participants reported either not completing training related to cannabis or being self-educated through the current literature. Conclusions: These results suggest program faculty may benefit from formal cannabis education in an effort to adequately integrate the content into curriculums.","PeriodicalId":45065,"journal":{"name":"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit drug in the U.S. and its use is becoming more popular with the legalization of medical marijuana. Currently, 36/50 states and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana for medical purposes. These changes have allowed for more cannabis-related research to be conducted. It is unknown how health professional education programs such as physical therapy and athletic training have integrated cannabis-related curriculum into their students’ training. This study aimed to identify how physical therapy and athletic training education programs are approaching teaching students about cannabis-related topics. Methods: There were 111 individuals from 40 states who responded to the survey (Males=53; Female=58), including 88 athletic training and 23 physical therapy faculty. Methods: An email was sent to all program directors of athletic training and physical therapy programs in the US with a Qualtrics survey link for faculty to complete. The 23-item questionnaire included closed-ended questions on demographics, where they sought cannabis-related information, and whether program curriculum includes cannabis-related topics. Frequencies were computed for sources of cannabis-related information and whether program curriculum includes cannabis-related topics. Results: Sixty (53.5%) participants stated they have not received information or completed any training related to cannabis. Of those receiving information or completing training (n=51), the most common sources of information were live lectures (n=23), peer-reviewed manuscripts (n=24), and social media/news (n=21). Also, 43 (38%) participants noted teaching cannabis-related topics in their curriculum. However, 33 participants reported either not completing training related to cannabis or being self-educated through the current literature. Conclusions: These results suggest program faculty may benefit from formal cannabis education in an effort to adequately integrate the content into curriculums.
美国运动训练和物理治疗课程中的大麻含量
背景:大麻是美国最常用的非法药物,随着医用大麻的合法化,大麻的使用越来越普遍。目前,50个州中有36个州和哥伦比亚特区已经将医用大麻合法化。这些变化使得更多与大麻相关的研究得以进行。目前尚不清楚物理治疗和运动训练等健康专业教育项目如何将大麻相关课程纳入学生的训练中。这项研究旨在确定物理治疗和运动训练教育项目如何接近学生关于大麻相关话题的教学。方法:有来自40个州的111人参与了调查(男性=53;女58人),其中运动训练教师88人,物理治疗教师23人。方法:向美国所有运动训练和物理治疗项目的项目主任发送一封电子邮件,其中包含Qualtrics调查链接,供教师完成。23项调查问卷包括人口统计问题,他们在哪里寻找大麻相关信息,以及项目课程是否包括大麻相关主题。计算了大麻相关信息来源的频率,以及项目课程是否包括大麻相关主题。结果:60名(53.5%)参与者表示他们没有接受过与大麻有关的信息或完成任何培训。在接受信息或完成培训的人中(n=51),最常见的信息来源是现场讲座(n=23),同行评审手稿(n=24)和社交媒体/新闻(n=21)。此外,43名(38%)参与者指出在他们的课程中教授大麻相关主题。然而,33名参与者报告说,他们要么没有完成与大麻有关的培训,要么通过现有文献自学。结论:这些结果表明,计划教师可能受益于正式的大麻教育,努力充分整合内容到课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信