Ana Laura Costa Menezes, Henrique Pott, Ariene Angelini dos Santos-Orlandi, Grace Angélica de Oliveira Gomes, Letícia Pimenta Costa-Guarisco, Sofia Cristina Iost Pavarini, Ana Carolina Ottaviani, Marisa Silvana Zazzetta, Fabiana de Souza Orlandi
{"title":"Change in the pattern of frailty among socially vulnerable older adults over a 36-month period and associated factors: a follow-up study","authors":"Ana Laura Costa Menezes, Henrique Pott, Ariene Angelini dos Santos-Orlandi, Grace Angélica de Oliveira Gomes, Letícia Pimenta Costa-Guarisco, Sofia Cristina Iost Pavarini, Ana Carolina Ottaviani, Marisa Silvana Zazzetta, Fabiana de Souza Orlandi","doi":"10.53886/gga.e0230034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate changes in the frailty levels of older adults in a context of high social vulnerability. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study. Data were collected from 2 surveys conducted in 2015 and 2018. The frailty phenotype and sociodemographic and health characterization instruments were used. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed, including non-parametric tests, test for equality of proportions, and multivariate multinomial logistic regression. The use of the database was authorized, and the research was approved by the Ethics Committee. Results: In 2015, 346 community-dwelling older adults participated in the study. After 36 months, a final sample of 223 participants was obtained. In 2015, the prevalence of non-frail, pre-frail, and frail older adults was 13.0%, 56.5%, and 30.5%, respectively. In 2018, 22.9% were non-frail, 56.0% were pre-frail, and 21.1% were frail. Higher education and better quality of life reduced the likelihood of becoming pre-frail and frail, respectively. Conclusion: There was a change in the pattern of frailty among socially vulnerable older adults over a 36-month period.","PeriodicalId":52782,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53886/gga.e0230034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate changes in the frailty levels of older adults in a context of high social vulnerability. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study. Data were collected from 2 surveys conducted in 2015 and 2018. The frailty phenotype and sociodemographic and health characterization instruments were used. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed, including non-parametric tests, test for equality of proportions, and multivariate multinomial logistic regression. The use of the database was authorized, and the research was approved by the Ethics Committee. Results: In 2015, 346 community-dwelling older adults participated in the study. After 36 months, a final sample of 223 participants was obtained. In 2015, the prevalence of non-frail, pre-frail, and frail older adults was 13.0%, 56.5%, and 30.5%, respectively. In 2018, 22.9% were non-frail, 56.0% were pre-frail, and 21.1% were frail. Higher education and better quality of life reduced the likelihood of becoming pre-frail and frail, respectively. Conclusion: There was a change in the pattern of frailty among socially vulnerable older adults over a 36-month period.