“MusicLab Copenhagen”: The Gains and Challenges of Radically Interdisciplinary Concert Research

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Anne Danielsen, Thea Sørli Paulsrud, Niels Chr. Hansen
{"title":"“MusicLab Copenhagen”: The Gains and Challenges of Radically Interdisciplinary Concert Research","authors":"Anne Danielsen, Thea Sørli Paulsrud, Niels Chr. Hansen","doi":"10.1177/20592043231194747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pioneering “research concerts” of recent decades represent prime examples of interdisciplinary music research. MusicLab Copenhagen, a collaboration between RITMO Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Rhythm, Time, and Motion at the University of Oslo and the Danish String Quartet was no exception in this regard. This paper aims to document and critically evaluate key components of the project by framing it as a radically interdisciplinary research collaboration. We review the multidimensional differences and similarities between the research traditions involved and report on semi-structured interviews with five key project members. This, in turn, forms the basis for a critical discussion of organizational aspects, aims, values, and overt and covert hierarchies resulting from the meeting of divergent scientific disciplines. Ultimately, we review the practical, epistemological, and theoretical gains and challenges involved in conducting organizationally complex research at the vanguard of interdisciplinarity—both in general terms and within music research in particular. A set of recommendations is provided for conducting successful research concerts, emphasizing, among other things, the importance of providing realistic and artistically satisfying concert experiences while still collecting valid, reliable, and sufficient data; of matching expectations about what can and cannot be achieved and concluded from the collected data; of prioritizing organizational competence and infrastructure, striking a balance between top-down control and bottom-up initiatives; and of recognizing and respecting each other's expertise across the involved research disciplines.","PeriodicalId":33047,"journal":{"name":"Music Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043231194747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pioneering “research concerts” of recent decades represent prime examples of interdisciplinary music research. MusicLab Copenhagen, a collaboration between RITMO Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Rhythm, Time, and Motion at the University of Oslo and the Danish String Quartet was no exception in this regard. This paper aims to document and critically evaluate key components of the project by framing it as a radically interdisciplinary research collaboration. We review the multidimensional differences and similarities between the research traditions involved and report on semi-structured interviews with five key project members. This, in turn, forms the basis for a critical discussion of organizational aspects, aims, values, and overt and covert hierarchies resulting from the meeting of divergent scientific disciplines. Ultimately, we review the practical, epistemological, and theoretical gains and challenges involved in conducting organizationally complex research at the vanguard of interdisciplinarity—both in general terms and within music research in particular. A set of recommendations is provided for conducting successful research concerts, emphasizing, among other things, the importance of providing realistic and artistically satisfying concert experiences while still collecting valid, reliable, and sufficient data; of matching expectations about what can and cannot be achieved and concluded from the collected data; of prioritizing organizational competence and infrastructure, striking a balance between top-down control and bottom-up initiatives; and of recognizing and respecting each other's expertise across the involved research disciplines.
“哥本哈根音乐实验室”:跨学科音乐会研究的收获与挑战
近几十年来开创性的“研究音乐会”代表了跨学科音乐研究的主要例子。哥本哈根音乐实验室是奥斯陆大学RITMO节奏、时间和运动跨学科研究中心与丹麦弦乐四重奏的合作项目,在这方面也不例外。本文旨在记录和批判性地评估项目的关键组成部分,将其框架为一个彻底的跨学科研究合作。我们回顾了所涉及的研究传统之间的多维差异和相似之处,并报告了与五位关键项目成员的半结构化访谈。这反过来又形成了对组织方面、目标、价值观以及由于不同科学学科的会议而产生的公开和隐蔽的等级制度进行批判性讨论的基础。最后,我们回顾了实践、认识论和理论方面的收获和挑战,这些收获和挑战涉及在跨学科前沿进行组织复杂的研究——无论是在一般情况下,还是在音乐研究中。为成功举办研究音乐会提供了一套建议,其中强调在收集有效、可靠和充分数据的同时,提供现实和艺术上令人满意的音乐会体验的重要性;从收集到的数据中得出什么能达到什么不能达到的结论;对组织能力和基础结构进行优先排序,在自上而下的控制和自下而上的计划之间取得平衡;认识和尊重彼此在相关研究领域的专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Music  Science
Music Science Arts and Humanities-Music
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信