On Facial Recognition, Regulation, and "Data Necropolitics"

Q3 Social Sciences
Antonio Pele, Caitlin Mulholland
{"title":"On Facial Recognition, Regulation, and \"Data Necropolitics\"","authors":"Antonio Pele, Caitlin Mulholland","doi":"10.2979/gls.2023.a886166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This paper argues for actual and legal regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) and facial recognition. These new technologies represent great opportunities to improve the welfare of societies. However, some of their uses can also enhance discrimination and, eventually, lead to violence. From a comparative approach (examining the European Union and Brazil), we address the current and future aspects of facial regulation, AI, and personal data. This paper shows that regulation is relevant to protect the rule of law, free markets, and individual freedoms. It also examines the looming risks unfolding from the unregulated uses of new technologies. Our concept of \"Data Necropolitics\" defines a predatory form of digital governance that exploits and discriminates against vulnerable populations.","PeriodicalId":39188,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2023.a886166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This paper argues for actual and legal regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) and facial recognition. These new technologies represent great opportunities to improve the welfare of societies. However, some of their uses can also enhance discrimination and, eventually, lead to violence. From a comparative approach (examining the European Union and Brazil), we address the current and future aspects of facial regulation, AI, and personal data. This paper shows that regulation is relevant to protect the rule of law, free markets, and individual freedoms. It also examines the looming risks unfolding from the unregulated uses of new technologies. Our concept of "Data Necropolitics" defines a predatory form of digital governance that exploits and discriminates against vulnerable populations.
关于面部识别、监管和“数据死亡政治”
摘要:本文主张对人工智能(AI)和面部识别进行实际和法律监管。这些新技术代表了改善社会福利的巨大机会。然而,它们的某些用途也可能加剧歧视,并最终导致暴力。通过比较方法(研究欧盟和巴西),我们解决了面部调节、人工智能和个人数据的当前和未来方面的问题。本文表明,监管与保护法治、自由市场和个人自由有关。报告还审视了不受监管地使用新技术所带来的潜在风险。我们的“数据死亡政治”概念定义了一种剥削和歧视弱势群体的掠夺性数字治理形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信