Human Blues

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Miriam Jaffe, Lluvia de Segovia de Kraker
{"title":"Human Blues","authors":"Miriam Jaffe, Lluvia de Segovia de Kraker","doi":"10.1353/prs.2023.a907266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human Blues Miriam Jaffe (bio) and Lluvia de Segovia de Kraker (bio) Elisa Albert. Human Blues. New York: Avid Reader Press, 2022. 401 pp. $28.00 hardback. Elisa albert gained her foothold as a jewish american fiction writer when she closed her short story collection with a letter to Philip Roth in which she offered to have his baby (How This Night Is Different, Free Press, 2006). That “baby” is Albert’s creative output, including The Book of Dahlia (Free Press, 2008), which automortographically renders Jewish American family dynamics, and Afterbirth (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2015), in which Albert explores the metaphorical connection between motherhood and authorship. In both of these novels, and in her work as an essayist, Albert channels the spirit of Philip Roth. Her latest novel, Human Blues, displays an array of Rothian attributes in contemplation of motherhood and creativity. The protagonist, Aviva, is a singer-songwriter fanning her emerging fame with controversy: imagine young Zuckerman of The Ghost Writer (1979) and his obsession with E. I. Lonoff—but female and obsessed with Amy Winehouse. And imagine this same Zuckerman, in The Human Stain (2008) and Exit Ghost (2007), incontinent and impotent, grieving the loss of virility at the center of his gender identity. Such is Aviva, but her problem of womanhood is that she is unable to conceive without medical intervention, or perhaps even with it. The novel is written during nine menstrual cycles of Aviva’s ruminations on infertility and motherhood as she faces off with social media posts and other forms of technology directed at women’s (re)productivity. Aviva performs these ruminations. The “performance” associated with celebrity is a metaphor for the roles assigned in various stages of gender and sexual identity: humans experience disappointment and shame when they cannot perform according to societal expectations. Perhaps with a nod to Simon Axler, a Rothian Jewish stage performer, Aviva’s inability to become naturally pregnant is her “humbling” (26). Axler is humbled by the loss of his sexual relevance, and Aviva is humbled by barrenness, which challenges her sense of womanhood. She encounters the fertility industry, which entices women to pay with their savings and minds and bodies for drugs and regulation and mostly harmful therapies. And like many of Roth’s pontificating narrators, who serve to [End Page 108] explore each novel’s polemic, Albert’s narrator scrutinizes the societal assumption that womanhood requires childbearing. Yet Aviva grieves the dispossession of these expectations with a cantankerous bereavement akin to the complex mourning process of another performer: Mickey Sabbath. An early review of Sabbath’s Theater (1995) describes the writing as “anti-moral,” with “plenty of nastiness” and “a narrative that moves, as its emotional temperature dictates” into “perverse confession” (Pritchard). The same could be said of Human Blues, whose female protagonist rages back at the expectations for womanhood and dedicates her artistry to the fight for autonomy over her own body. In a US political culture that values babies’ lives over their mother’s lives, Aviva opposes social media advertisements that promote the miracle of hormone therapy, and those that celebrate the dream of global adoptions through surrogates in developing countries. Albert takes on the woman’s right to choose not to bear a child in a country cruelly divided on the issue. At the same time, she puts forward this question, as she looks at how people speak of the babies that are conceived through reproductive technology: Why is it that the value of human life only counts when people want it? Aviva also has in common with Sabbath the inescapable experience of grief, as with every cycle, instead of life, she encounters death: “Every godforsaken period, every cycle, every fractal season: awakening, hope, decay, death, around and around, again and again, to death, death, death” (2). Similarly, Sabbath is haunted by the ghosts of his past, and he suffers the loss of the promise of life and fertility embodied by his lover Drenka, as she becomes ill with ovarian cancer and dies. While Roth progressively builds up this theme with an oppressive effect, each paragraph revealing a new change in the character’s thoughts, Albert draws on his style, but she...","PeriodicalId":37093,"journal":{"name":"Philip Roth Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philip Roth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/prs.2023.a907266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human Blues Miriam Jaffe (bio) and Lluvia de Segovia de Kraker (bio) Elisa Albert. Human Blues. New York: Avid Reader Press, 2022. 401 pp. $28.00 hardback. Elisa albert gained her foothold as a jewish american fiction writer when she closed her short story collection with a letter to Philip Roth in which she offered to have his baby (How This Night Is Different, Free Press, 2006). That “baby” is Albert’s creative output, including The Book of Dahlia (Free Press, 2008), which automortographically renders Jewish American family dynamics, and Afterbirth (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2015), in which Albert explores the metaphorical connection between motherhood and authorship. In both of these novels, and in her work as an essayist, Albert channels the spirit of Philip Roth. Her latest novel, Human Blues, displays an array of Rothian attributes in contemplation of motherhood and creativity. The protagonist, Aviva, is a singer-songwriter fanning her emerging fame with controversy: imagine young Zuckerman of The Ghost Writer (1979) and his obsession with E. I. Lonoff—but female and obsessed with Amy Winehouse. And imagine this same Zuckerman, in The Human Stain (2008) and Exit Ghost (2007), incontinent and impotent, grieving the loss of virility at the center of his gender identity. Such is Aviva, but her problem of womanhood is that she is unable to conceive without medical intervention, or perhaps even with it. The novel is written during nine menstrual cycles of Aviva’s ruminations on infertility and motherhood as she faces off with social media posts and other forms of technology directed at women’s (re)productivity. Aviva performs these ruminations. The “performance” associated with celebrity is a metaphor for the roles assigned in various stages of gender and sexual identity: humans experience disappointment and shame when they cannot perform according to societal expectations. Perhaps with a nod to Simon Axler, a Rothian Jewish stage performer, Aviva’s inability to become naturally pregnant is her “humbling” (26). Axler is humbled by the loss of his sexual relevance, and Aviva is humbled by barrenness, which challenges her sense of womanhood. She encounters the fertility industry, which entices women to pay with their savings and minds and bodies for drugs and regulation and mostly harmful therapies. And like many of Roth’s pontificating narrators, who serve to [End Page 108] explore each novel’s polemic, Albert’s narrator scrutinizes the societal assumption that womanhood requires childbearing. Yet Aviva grieves the dispossession of these expectations with a cantankerous bereavement akin to the complex mourning process of another performer: Mickey Sabbath. An early review of Sabbath’s Theater (1995) describes the writing as “anti-moral,” with “plenty of nastiness” and “a narrative that moves, as its emotional temperature dictates” into “perverse confession” (Pritchard). The same could be said of Human Blues, whose female protagonist rages back at the expectations for womanhood and dedicates her artistry to the fight for autonomy over her own body. In a US political culture that values babies’ lives over their mother’s lives, Aviva opposes social media advertisements that promote the miracle of hormone therapy, and those that celebrate the dream of global adoptions through surrogates in developing countries. Albert takes on the woman’s right to choose not to bear a child in a country cruelly divided on the issue. At the same time, she puts forward this question, as she looks at how people speak of the babies that are conceived through reproductive technology: Why is it that the value of human life only counts when people want it? Aviva also has in common with Sabbath the inescapable experience of grief, as with every cycle, instead of life, she encounters death: “Every godforsaken period, every cycle, every fractal season: awakening, hope, decay, death, around and around, again and again, to death, death, death” (2). Similarly, Sabbath is haunted by the ghosts of his past, and he suffers the loss of the promise of life and fertility embodied by his lover Drenka, as she becomes ill with ovarian cancer and dies. While Roth progressively builds up this theme with an oppressive effect, each paragraph revealing a new change in the character’s thoughts, Albert draws on his style, but she...
人类的蓝调
人类蓝调Miriam Jaffe(生物)和Lluvia de Segovia de Kraker(生物)Elisa Albert。人类的蓝调。纽约:Avid Reader出版社,2022。401页,精装本28.00美元。艾丽莎·艾伯特作为一名美国犹太小说作家,在她的短篇小故事集结束语中,她给菲利普·罗斯写了一封信,在信中她提出要生下他的孩子(《今夜如何不同》,自由出版社,2006年)。这个“婴儿”是艾伯特的创造性成果,包括《大丽花之书》(自由出版社,2008年),该书自动地呈现了犹太美国家庭的动态,以及《后生》(霍顿·米夫林·哈科特,2015年),其中阿尔伯特探索了母性和作者之间的隐喻联系。在这两部小说和她作为散文家的作品中,艾伯特引导着菲利普·罗斯的精神。她的最新小说《人类的忧郁》(Human Blues)在对母性和创造力的沉思中展现了一系列罗思安式的特质。主人公艾薇娃是一位创作型歌手,她的名声正因争议而不断上升:想象一下《幽灵作家》(1979)中年轻的朱克曼和他对e·i·洛诺夫的迷恋——但他是女性,迷恋艾米·怀恩豪斯。再想象一下,在《人类的印记》(2008)和《退出的幽灵》(2007)中,同样的祖克曼大小便失禁,阳痿,为失去男性气概而悲伤,这是他性别认同的核心。这就是艾薇娃,但她作为女性的问题是,如果没有医疗干预,甚至可能有医疗干预,她就无法怀孕。这部小说是在艾薇娃面对社交媒体帖子和其他形式的针对女性(再)生产力的技术时,她对不孕症和母性的九个月经周期进行反思时写的。Aviva执行这些思考。与名人有关的“表演”是对性别和性身份在不同阶段被分配的角色的一种隐喻:当人们不能按照社会期望表演时,他们会感到失望和羞耻。也许是在向罗锡安犹太舞台演员西蒙·艾克斯勒(Simon Axler)致敬,Aviva无法自然怀孕是她的“耻辱”(26)。艾克斯勒因失去了自己的性关联而感到谦卑,而阿维娃因不孕而感到谦卑,这挑战了她的女性意识。她遇到了生育行业,这个行业诱使女性用自己的积蓄、思想和身体来支付药物、监管和大多有害的治疗。就像罗斯笔下的许多自以为是的叙述者一样,阿尔伯特的叙述者仔细审视了社会对女性需要生育的假设。然而,对于这些期望的丧失,阿杰娃以一种暴躁的丧亲之情感到悲伤,类似于另一位表演者米奇·萨巴斯(Mickey Sabbath)复杂的哀悼过程。对《安息日的剧场》(1995)的早期评论将其描述为“反道德的”,有“大量的肮脏”和“随着情感温度的变化而移动的叙述”进入“反常的忏悔”(普理查德)。《人类蓝调》也是如此,它的女主人公愤怒地回击了对女性的期望,并将她的艺术奉献给了对自己身体自主权的斗争。在重视婴儿生命甚于母亲生命的美国政治文化中,英杰华反对宣传激素治疗奇迹的社交媒体广告,也反对那些在发展中国家通过代孕实现全球收养梦想的广告。阿尔伯特在一个在这个问题上存在严重分歧的国家,承担了女性选择不生孩子的权利。与此同时,当她观察人们如何谈论通过生殖技术孕育的婴儿时,她提出了这样一个问题:为什么只有当人们想要生命的时候,生命的价值才有价值?英杰华也与安息日的不可避免的经历悲伤,每一辆自行车,而不是生活,她遇到死亡:“每个堕落的时期,每个周期,每个分季节:觉醒,希望,腐烂,死亡,,,一次又一次死亡,死亡,死亡”(2)。同样,安息日被过去的鬼魂,他遭受的损失生命的承诺和他的情人Drenka生育能力的体现,当她成为患卵巢癌和死亡。罗斯以压抑的效果逐步建立起这个主题,每一段都揭示了人物思想的新变化,艾伯特借鉴了他的风格,但她……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philip Roth Studies
Philip Roth Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信